On Tuesday 15 March 2005 07:02 am, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote:
> > > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > A cleaner solution,
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 07:02 am, Chris Hodgins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:45:24 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote:
> > > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading
>
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:45:24 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote:
> > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ?
> >
> > A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're run
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote:
> > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ?
> >
> > A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd
> > like to ^c, is t
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ?
>
> A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd
> like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and
> reattach
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ?
>
> A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that
you'd
> like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach
> to the screen session later to see how it went.
>
>
Gert Cuykens wrote:
can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ?
A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd
like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach
to the screen session later to see how it went.
Screen should
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:20:46 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 05:15 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:01 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In your case you should get your ports up to date with portmana
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:01 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In your case you should get your ports up to date with portmanager -u
> before you worry about deleting leaves. because gnome was just upgraded
> it may take a day or two for everything to be brought up to date. See
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:46:59 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't NUKE it, just X it. Then run portmanager -u before you exit
> gnome. If gnome needs it it portmanager -u will bring it back. In a
> worst case scenerio you can run portmanager -u from the consol.
>
> Person
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:21:50 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 04:06 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
> >
> > portmanager -sl
> >
> > xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 dir -=&
Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
portmanager -sl
xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 dir -=> /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-fontserver
COMMENT=X font server from X.Org
xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 dir -=> /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-type1
COMMENT=X.Org Type1 fonts
xorg
12 matches
Mail list logo