Fbsd8 wrote:
I have noticed that the /etc/rc.d/jail script
will not start a jail that has the same ip address
as a jail that is already running.
But if I define 2 jails the manual way in rc.conf that
have the same ip address they will start.
So is this a bug in the "jail" script o
I have noticed that the /etc/rc.d/jail script
will not start a jail that has the same ip address
as a jail that is already running.
But if I define 2 jails the manual way in rc.conf that
have the same ip address they will start.
So is this a bug in the "jail" script or is there some
Hello,
# poudriere jail -c -j 9amd64 -v stable/9 -m svn
...
--
>>> World build completed on Wed Jan 9 01:32:43 CET 2013
--
>> Starting make installworld
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:29:44 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> >
> > 31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" :
> >
> >> Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's
> >> /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account
> >> using the same pw command, still no joy.
> >
>
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:25:38 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Now when I login to the jail over remote ssh to the just created user
> account I get the % prompt, then su to root and get the
> set prompt = "# %/ >".
> I want that same prompt for all user I create in the jail.
Ea
Aldis Berjoza wrote:
31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" :
Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's
/usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account
using the same pw command, still no joy.
Shouldn't that be /etc/skel/.cshrc ?
Nope, no such directory as /etc/skel as
31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" :
> Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's
> /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account
> using the same pw command, still no joy.
Shouldn't that be /etc/skel/.cshrc ?
--
Aldis Berjoza
FreeBSD addict
___
When I change the prompt for root's .cshrc file in the jail
it works as expected.
if ($?prompt) then
# An interactive shell -- set some stuff up
set prompt = "# %/ >"
set filec
set history = 100
set savehist = 100
set mail
Fbsd8 wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote:
Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things
to get that to work? I am after the details.
You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults
to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote:
Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things
to get that to work? I am after the details.
You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults
to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the sshd
On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things
> to get that to work? I am after the details.
You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults
to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the sshd configuration in
th
ic
I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using ssh.
How do I setup host user accounts so they login to
their associated jail?
Is this something I code in the host user account or is it done
by the remote ssh login command?
How do other jail users do this?
I assign public IPs
c
>
> I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using ssh.
> How do I setup host user accounts so they login to
> their associated jail?
> Is this something I code in the host user account or is it done
> by the remote ssh login command?
>
> How do other jail
Have jails up and running on host with ip address of
10.0.10.10 10.0.10.11 10.0.10.12 10.0.10.13 10.0.10.14
The host rc.conf has
ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" # nix connected to isp
ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.10.2" #lan nic
I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using
On 12/22/12 17:08, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:56:09 +0100,
Bas Smeelen a écrit :
I have poudriere setup on a server to compile packages for my old
laptop, mini, and some friends laptops and it works great.
How can I upgrade the perl version of the poudriere jail to
perl
Le Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:56:09 +0100,
Bas Smeelen a écrit :
> I have poudriere setup on a server to compile packages for my old
> laptop, mini, and some friends laptops and it works great.
>
> How can I upgrade the perl version of the poudriere jail to
> perl-5.16, it is now pe
I have poudriere setup on a server to compile packages for my old
laptop, mini, and some friends laptops and it works great.
How can I upgrade the perl version of the poudriere jail to perl-5.16,
it is now perl-5.14?
I tried startied the jail with poudriere jail -s -j and then try jail
David Wolfskill wrote:
[Please include me in responses; I've set Reply-To as a hint. Thanks!]
A colleague had been running a program that makes use of IPCS message
queues in a 7.x/i386 environment.
He was moved to a 32-bit 7.x-based jail instantiated on an 8.x/amd64
host.
Within that
[Please include me in responses; I've set Reply-To as a hint. Thanks!]
A colleague had been running a program that makes use of IPCS message
queues in a 7.x/i386 environment.
He was moved to a 32-bit 7.x-based jail instantiated on an 8.x/amd64
host.
Within that jail, "ipcs -a&quo
> Want a nullfs filesystem to be read-only for tech people to search-only
> maillog files.
>
> host machine's files:
>
> /var/log/mx1/maillog* files
>
> the maillog files are all 644 and r bit is set all along the path
>
>
> using ezjail
>
> jail root is
Want a nullfs filesystem to be read-only for tech people to search-only maillog
files.
host machine's files:
/var/log/mx1/maillog* files
the maillog files are all 644 and r bit is set all along the path
using ezjail
jail root is /var/jails
jail name is fixit
mkdir -p /var/jails/fixi
I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The
jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If
the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?
man mount_nullfs
___
freebsd-ques
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
>
> I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail.
> The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine.
> If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?
>
On Aug 16, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
>
> I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail.
> The jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine.
> If the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?
>
To s
On 08/16/2012 21:51, Len Conrad wrote:
I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The
jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If
the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?
What I'd really like is some
I have an ssh user who needs only to search some log files not in his jail. The
jail required because I don't want the user seeing the rest the machine. If
the dirs were linked to his jail, would that work?
What I'd really like is something like ftpchroot for but ssh.
suggest
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=29968&highlight=nfsd
Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion.
you are truly funny.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
to use (eg:
> tinderbox) finally, 3) If you try to use net/unfs3 and succeed to export
> NFS, this will not have a very fast (ro) transport rate and will have
> many (rw) speed limitations.
>
>
> My personal conclusion is to wait until the default kernel version of
>
of
nfs is updated to be jail-friendly before I try using nfs in jails.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
>> Hmm
>> I added that and rebooted the jail host sy
formance. Just do it.
Do you run unfs3 in a jail on both the host:server and remote:client sides?
Not now. but tried. unfs doesn't need ANY special kernel calls. It runs
just like any program using UDP/TCP communication. jail/no jail doesn't
make a difference. As with most programs.
ome online?
Do you run unfs3 in a jail on both the host:server and remote:client sides?
Are there any sysctl nob settings needed to make unfs3 run in a jail?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Now here is the KEY. No where does it say it has the "server" side
function, only the client side.
/usr/ports/net/unfs3
Even if someone "proved" that it doesn't do NFS server work, i will
continue to use it as NFS server, because it works very well ;)
___
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:42:45AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
> Ruben de Groot wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
> >>Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Many thanks in advance.
> >
> Quick answer is "No, NFS only runs on the host system".
>
> >>>but user space nfsd wo
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
>
> Dealing with this has been SOP practice in jails since their inception.
>> See man 8 jail. The best way to run the NFS server is from the jail.
>> Running it host side is the hard part.
>>
>>
> http://www.freebsd
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is "No, NFS only runs on the host system".
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
Close but no cigar.
In the ports system it's named unfs3 and de
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Many thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Quick answer is "No, NFS only runs on the host system".
> >>
> >but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
> >
> >
>
> Close but no cigar.
>
> In the ports system it'
s have 18k downloads even
though it's labeled as beta version.
So the question back to Wojciech Puchar is; are you running this unfs3
in a client jail on one pc and the server side in a jail on the host?
Put another way can you confirm from experience that this unfs3 port has
both clien
Really? Is that stable enough to serve files for months without disruption?
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>
>>> Many thanks in advance.
>>>
>>
>> Quick answer is "No, NFS only runs on the host system".
>>
>but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Pl
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is "No, NFS only runs on the host system".
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, s
Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
#
their inception.
See man 8 jail. The best way to run the NFS server is from the jail.
Running it host side is the hard part.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133265
The jail code maintainer says NFS server/client will not work jailed. So
since you say this is SOP (standard operation
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:55:51 -0500, Adam Vande More
wrote:
There are a number of people who have reached the
opposite decision concerning VIMAGE/VNET enabled jails. They are much
easier to work with and provide nice capabilities.
I tried it on 9.0-RELEASE and was able to cause kernel pani
ir inception.
See man 8 jail. The best way to run the NFS server is from the jail.
Running it host side is the hard part.
> There is some experimental software to give each jail its own network
> stack but I sure would not deploy a production system based on this.
>
There are a numb
Clear!
Thanks a lot.
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:02 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
> blackfriar wrote:
> > Hi everybody!
> > I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a "clear fashion" an NFS server
> > within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
> >
> > I'm having s
blackfriar wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a "clear fashion" an NFS server
within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
I'm having some issues that make me think this is not supposed to work.
I've googled it but I couldn't find much especially
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
Hmm
I added that and rebooted the jail host system. However, the setting in sysctl
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed is still 0 after the reboot
# sysctl -a |
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
n the jail in question, and recently had need to add mod_fcgid to it. NOTE
that the Apache and mod_fcgid were not installed through ports or packages. I
download the source and build myself (for various reasons).
Apache inside the Jail, with mod_fcgid enabled will not start:
[Mon Jul 23 10:
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a "clear fashion" an NFS server
within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
I'm having some issues that make me think this is not supposed to work.
I've googled it but I couldn't find much especially on releases prior
5!!
Hi Darren,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 04:57:43 +0400
Darren Baginski wrote:
> No, feel free to open if you feel it needed.
> I would say it's more a feature request, but without it, bsdinstall not
> usable on non release environments.
thanks, I submitted the PR here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
29.07.2012, 00:29, "Matthias Petermann" :
> Hi Darren,
>
> thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in
> the bsdinstall code and understand it now.
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400
> Darren Baginski wrote:
>
>> I thing release/arch selection has to be a par
Hi Darren,
thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in the
bsdinstall code and understand it now.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400
Darren Baginski wrote:
> I thing release/arch selection has to be a part of the installer, either
> directly or via environment v
28.07.2012, 17:13, "Darren Baginski" :
> 28.07.2012, 13:46, "Matthias Petermann" :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> currently I experienced an unexpected behavior of the FreeBSD bsdinstall
>> installer. Some weeks ago I could use it sucessfully to create a
28.07.2012, 13:46, "Matthias Petermann" :
> Hello,
>
> currently I experienced an unexpected behavior of the FreeBSD bsdinstall
> installer. Some weeks ago I could use it sucessfully to create a jail
> environment with
>
> # bsdinstall jail /jails/myjail
>
Hello,
currently I experienced an unexpected behavior of the FreeBSD bsdinstall
installer. Some weeks ago I could use it sucessfully to create a jail
environment with
# bsdinstall jail /jails/myjail
Today I tried to repeat this on another system(2) and it fails after the
selection of the to
Hi
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the jail in question, and
Hi Matthew,
thanks for your response.
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:05:00 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> What does
>
> # ps -uxp 6255
>
> show, from within the jail? (if you've restarted slapd since,
> substitute the current PID, obviously.)
This is funny, I restarted
On 04/07/2012 06:20, Matthias Petermann wrote:
> When I now do "ps aux" within the Jail, it doesn't show me the slapd
> process but doing the same in the Host system, I can see it.
>
>[matthias@netti2 /usr/home/matthias]$ ps ax|grep slap
> 6255 ?? IsJ0:
Hello,
under my FreeBSD 9 I recently found a behavior I cannot explain. The systems
fingerprint is:
netti2# uname -a
FreeBSD netti2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC
2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
There is a Jail
On Apr 14, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:59:47 -0500, wrote:
>>
>> I don't see any v2 in the jail environment. Vimage is a separate software
>> module that is not part of the the system base release. It has to be
>> compiled in
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:59:47 -0500, wrote:
I don't see any v2 in the jail environment. Vimage is a separate
software module that is not part of the the system base release. It has
to be compiled into a custom kernel to be enabled and it's labeled as
experimental, "use a
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:18:05 -0500, wrote:
Where can I find documentation on version 2 of jail?
It's quite scare because it's still experimental. I'd look up VNET and
VIMAGE. You can probably get more questions answered on the
freebsd-jails@ mailing lis
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:01:08 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
freebsd-jails@
My apologies; this should be singular and not plural:
freebsd-jail@
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:18:05 -0500, wrote:
Where can I find documentation on version 2 of jail?
It's quite scare because it's still experimental. I'd look up VNET and
VIMAGE. You can probably get more questions answered on the freebsd-jails@
Where can I find documentation on version 2 of jail?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 04/06/12 03:24, bsd wrote:
Hi,
I have followed the tutorial provided in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-application.html
I have now five jails up and running and I am very happy with the system.
One of my jail is acting as an important DNS server and It
On 05/04/2012 18:24, bsd wrote:
> I have decided to recompile bind in the latest version and I am
> running into a problem which is caused by bind port not following the
> FreeBSD requisites and trying to install things in /usr/include/isc
What on earth gives you the idea that dns/bind98 doesn't c
Hi,
I have followed the tutorial provided in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-application.html
I have now five jails up and running and I am very happy with the system.
One of my jail is acting as an important DNS server and It needs to be up to
date.
I have
Fbsd8 wrote:
> In most cases your jail environment will function ok as long as
> its the same base release level. Example, host=8.0 jail1=8.1 and
> jail2=8.2
IIUC, a better example would be host=8.2, jail1=8.1 and jail2=8.0.
A point release is not supposed to make any incompatible c
James Y Chen wrote:
Hi
I think Jail on FreeBSD 8.2 can generate 2 jailed machine using the same
version of FreeBSD, for example, on a 8.2 AMD64 Jailer, I can create 2
or more FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 Jailed machine.
My question is: can I install other version of FreeBSD on the Jailed
environment? If
James Y Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think Jail on FreeBSD 8.2 can generate 2 jailed machine using the same
> version of FreeBSD, for example, on a 8.2 AMD64 Jailer, I can create 2
> or more FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 Jailed machine.
>
> My question is: can I install other version of
u and you want to easily keep things up
to date across jails, I'd take a look at ezjail:
http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/
Patrick
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, James Y Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think Jail on FreeBSD 8.2 can generate 2 jailed machine using the same
> v
2012-04-03 08:20, James Y Chen skrev:
Hi
Hello
My question is: can I install other version of FreeBSD on the Jailed
environment?
Since all jails use the same kernel I think you can not do that.
There has been a lot of changes between versions of freebsd.
___
Hi
I think Jail on FreeBSD 8.2 can generate 2 jailed machine using the same
version of FreeBSD, for example, on a 8.2 AMD64 Jailer, I can create 2
or more FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 Jailed machine.
My question is: can I install other version of FreeBSD on the Jailed
environment? If yes, which steps shall
Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list
I've setup a 32-bit jail on amd64 freebsd 8.2-stable.
It works, sort of, but when i run portsnap extract in the jail it say
Building new INDEX files... make_index: fopen(/dev/stdin): No such file
or directory
#ls /dev
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel12
On 03/13/12 09:15, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list
I've setup a 32-bit jail on amd64 freebsd 8.2-stable.
It works, sort of, but when i run portsnap extract in the jail it say
Building new INDEX files... make_index: fopen(/dev/stdin): No such
file or directory
#ls /dev
lrwxr-xr-x 1
Hello list
I've setup a 32-bit jail on amd64 freebsd 8.2-stable.
It works, sort of, but when i run portsnap extract in the jail it say
Building new INDEX files... make_index: fopen(/dev/stdin): No such file
or directory
#ls /dev
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel12 6 Mar 02:56 log ->
Hello list,
I'm trying to build perl5.12 in a jail running on 8.2-STABLE, to
ultimately build php5.
I'm getting the following error:
Running Mkbootstrap for threads::shared ()
chmod 644 shared.bs
rm -f ../../lib/auto/threads/shared/shared.so
cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -fstack
Hello!
I try to start service auditd into jail.
I permit the device "audit" from the parent OS, everything else is limited.
When I start auditd, I see the message: "Error setting audit stat".
What steps do I need to do and what permission (perhaps via sysctl) I
must to giv
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 17:15, bsd a écrit :
> Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
>>> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
>>
>> Are you running syslogd in the host envi
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
> On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
>> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
>
> Are you running syslogd in the host environment?
Yes I am running it both in the host and jail environment.
On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
Are you running syslogd in the host environment? If so, it's probably
bound to INADDR_ANY and thus pre-empted your jailed syslog from binding
to a network port.
Tr
Hello,
I would like to setup a syslog server inside a jail
I have setup couple of other jail and they are already working as a DNS server
and a HTTP server.
The next step would be to configure a new jail as a syslog server.
I have the following parameters :
jail_enable=&quo
On 17-01-2012, Tue [23:31:30], Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >Create snapshots of your datasets and use zfs send. You can even transfer
> >differences between snapshots.
> and then try to recover data from these backups after a year or so ;)
No one did mention the retention policy ;)
Jokes aside,
>> Subject: Backup strategy for zfs + jail
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a simple 1U server with two disks that I have configured as a jail
> server.
>>
>> I want to setup a simple yet very efficient backup policy for my jail
> environment.
>>
Create snapshots of your datasets and use zfs send. You can even transfer
differences between snapshots.
and then try to recover data from these backups after a year or so ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
--> Efficiency
--> Compatibility with ZFS
If you're running 9, give HAST a shot.
maybe a stupid question but what is a practical difference between hast
and doing ggate+gmirror and setting "prefer" load balancing to local disk?
___
freebsd-question
BSD
> > Subject: Backup strategy for zfs + jail
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a simple 1U server with two disks that I have configured as a jail
> server.
> >
> > I want to setup a simple yet very efficient backup policy for my jail
> environment
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of bsd
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:04 PM
> To: Liste FreeBSD
> Subject: Backup strategy for zfs + jail
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a s
Hi,
I have a simple 1U server with two disks that I have configured as a jail
server.
I want to setup a simple yet very efficient backup policy for my jail
environment.
This server is running a ZFS filesystem.
Ideally I would like to backup the main zfsroot/jail and all subdirectories on
Le 12 janv. 2012 à 19:46, bsd a écrit :
>
> Le 12 janv. 2012 à 17:29, ss griffon a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, bsd wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I am following the FBSD handbook tutorial in order to install the world in
>&
Le 12 janv. 2012 à 17:29, ss griffon a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM, bsd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I am following the FBSD handbook tutorial in order to install the world in
>> my jail template :
>>
>> # cd /usr/src
>> # make
Hi,
I am following the FBSD handbook tutorial in order to install the world in my
jail template :
# cd /usr/src
# make installworld DESTDIR=/jails/j/mroot
The directory already exists.
I have the following errors :
> ln -fs libcom_err.so.5 /jails/j/mroot/usr/lib/libcom_err
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:56 AM, bsd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only
> able to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
>
Yeah bro, it bit me in the ass as well ;-) the SysV IPC is common for
the whole system. So any
Le 5 janv. 2012 à 14:56, bsd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only
> able to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
>
> I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
>
> kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
Hi,
I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only able
to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
kern.ipc.shmall=409600
kern.ipc.semmap=256
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> We're using 8.1 + VIMAGE and using openvpn, ipfw, and IPSec within jail
> successfully.
>
> No stability issues with other jails (so far), but then again only been
> running that setup (with IPSec/openvpn in a vima
; on some jails we provide them. We can provide them with a public IP
> for the jail but I'm not sure if this will work.
>
> I understand from the thread that recompiling the kernel with VIMAGE
> enabled should allow the use of IPSec in the jails but apparently
> until 8.0 this wa
Hello,
I was following a thread in FBSD Spanish talking about the use of
IPSec in Jails and there was no conclusion to the matter. I have a
client that wants to run a VPN which requires IPSec and he is running
on some jails we provide them. We can provide them with a public IP
for the jail but
101 - 200 of 1377 matches
Mail list logo
