On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:50:00 Michiel Overtoom wrote:
> I never understood the need for transparent windows. If you're working in
> a window you want to concentrate on its contents, not on stuff that's
> happening beneath it. It breaks the flow. I think it's indicative of the
> ritalin-g
On August 26, 2009 06:50:00 am Michiel Overtoom wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009 16:12:03 Andrew Gould wrote:
> > Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in
> > resource consumption?
>
> As I see it, KDE4 fell in the Vista trap. I tried KDE4 and was showered
> with eye c
On Friday 07 August 2009 16:12:03 Andrew Gould wrote:
> Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in
> resource consumption?
As I see it, KDE4 fell in the Vista trap. I tried KDE4 and was showered with
eye candy effects, some of which couldn't even be disabled. Also, quit
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:23:20PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> i'd be interested in Paul's question. it may be that kde3
> > is sopping up wy to much disc space. only have 6.5g
> > left
>
> KDE4 makes KDE3 look like Fluxb
On Thursday 06 August 2009 19:26:20 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On August 6, 2009 9:29:30 PM -0500 Mel Flynn
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
> >> about it? Do I need to completely unin
--On Friday, August 07, 2009 00:27:00 -0500 Kent Stewart
wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:53:05 pm Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl
>
> wrote:
>> Can someone who has already done this upgrade sug
Le Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:53:05 -0500,
Paul Schmehl a écrit :
> I don't want to run KDE3 and KDE4 side by side. I want to migrate
> from the former to the latter.
K3B needs kde3 and amarok2 is not yet ready for KDE 4.3. I still use
amarok 1.4.
There is no problem to use kde3 and kde4.
___
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:12:03 -0500
Andrew Gould wrote:
> Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in
> resource consumption? (Please forgive me - I know that's a horribly
> subjective question.)
IMO it's less usable in terms of ergonomics, and they are still talking
abou
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:53:05 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould
> wrote:
> > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own
> > directory folder. This may imply that KDE3 and KDE4 can coexist.
> >
> > As always, YMMV.
>
> I was looking
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:23 AM, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> i'd be interested in Paul's question. it may be that kde3
>> is sopping up wy to much disc space. only have 6.5g
>> left
>
> KDE4 makes KDE3 look like Fluxbox.
>
> I
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700
Gary Kline wrote:
i'd be interested in Paul's question. it may be that kde3
> is sopping up wy to much disc space. only have 6.5g
> left
KDE4 makes KDE3 look like Fluxbox.
I can't remember the exact figures on /usr, but I mainta
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500
Andrew Gould wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul
> Schmehl wrote:
> > Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way
> > to go about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is
> > there an upgrade path that's not fraught
On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 22:49:09 PDT Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:37:26AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould
wrote:
> Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory
> folder.
Terminology: the directory (is not a folde
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:37:26AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould
> wrote:
> > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory
> > folder.
>
> Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder).
> FreeBSD h
On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:53:05 pm Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould
>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
> >> about it? Do I need to compl
--On August 6, 2009 9:29:30 PM -0500 Mel Flynn
wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote:
Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an
upgrade path that's not fraught with go
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould
> wrote:
>> Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory
>> folder.
>
> Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder).
> FreeBSD has directories
On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
> about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an
> upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas?
Wait a week I'd say. KDE 4.3.0 has hit the port
--On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an
upgrade path that's not fraught with got
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould
wrote:
> Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory
> folder.
Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder).
FreeBSD has directories, not folders. :-)
--
Polytropon
>From Magdeburg, German
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
> about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an
> upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas?
>
i have a "me-too" here. i d
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go
> about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an
> upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas?
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
>
Unl
Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go about
it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an upgrade path
that's not fraught with gotchas?
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not th
23 matches
Mail list logo
