On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:11:09PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: I'm sure others can think of more points in support or linking to libc
: and against linking to it :-)
Most of what I want to do is low-level encryption... like copy protection
routines. I love those. So who needs libc for
On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
ld
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:37:02PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
: On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
: tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
: I
On 2005-08-30 11:43, Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:37:02PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-08-30 04:29, Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
tutorials. But since I
Hi all,
I'm doing some experimentation with assembly code based on the int80h.org
tutorials. But since I am going to use malloc and some other functions,
I need to make my code link with libc rather than stand totally on its own.
ld -s -o foo foo.o -lc
leaves 'environ' and '__progname'
