;Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Load Averages
Sure, flush the rules and the current state and start over. I haven't
seen any issues with ipfw but I am recently more familiar with pf.
I think ipfw usage should be accounted for pr
gt;
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Patrick C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ; "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Load Aver
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: Load Averages
I don't think it's an accounting bug, my guess is there is an issue in
the kernel.
Have you checked the output of dmesg? Anything unusual? Any
el <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Checked top, it does not have the 'S' option.
>
> Guess its time to upgrade ... (???)
>
>
> -Grant
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
Ivan,
Checked top, it does not have the 'S' option.
Guess its time to upgrade ... (???)
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: Load Averages
_
Grant Peel wrote:
last pid: 5181; load averages: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 up 741+02:47:14
10:19:56
23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping
CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2%
idle
Mem: 34M Active, 102M Inact, 44M Wired, 9924K Cache, 35M Buf, 58M Free
Swap
Hi all,
I have a machine that has be up now for a little over two years:
voyager ROOT /var/log > w
10:15AM up 741 days, 2:42, 1 user, load averages: 1.06, 1.02, 1.00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT
p0 10:08AM - w
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running 5.4-Prerelease with daapd 0.2.3d. I notice that
the load average runs right at 1.0, and 0 if daapd is not running.
I was just wondering if this was normal. I do have some
w4p files in my col
how load averages work. On some sites
they say a load average of 3 is high and to put services on another
server others say if it is over 1 put move services to another server.
I have read the handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/basics-processes.html
I guess I am not
ot;(^REVISION|^BRANCH)" /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
>>
>>GPT> David Fleck wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Michael Ross wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13
>>>>>>
Dmitry Kozhevnikov wrote:
>please show us
>1. cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
>2. uname -a
>3. egrep "(^REVISION|^BRANCH)" /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
>
>GPT> David Fleck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Michael Ross wrote:
>>>
>>>>> la
please show us
1. cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
2. uname -a
3. egrep "(^REVISION|^BRANCH)" /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
GPT> David Fleck wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Michael Ross wrote:
>>
>>>> last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13
David Fleck wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Michael Ross wrote:
last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13
08:11:07
Your may have compiled kernel and userland from different sources.
" and programs like ps(1) and top(1) will fail to work until the
kernel and source
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Michael Ross wrote:
last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13 08:11:07
Your may have compiled kernel and userland from different sources.
" and programs like ps(1) and top(1) will fail to work until the kernel and source
code versions are the
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:13:53 -0300
"Giovanni P. Tirloni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the output of top:
>
> last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13 08:11:07
> 48 processes: 1 running, 47 sleeping
> CPU stat
Hi,
This is the output of top:
last pid: 771; load averages: 176.65, 770.13, 926.55 up 0+00:03:13 08:11:07
48 processes: 1 running, 47 sleeping
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
Mem: 40M Active, 63M Inact, 45M Wired, 16K Cache, 35M Buf, 99M Free
Swap: 487M
d here is my top output
> last pid: 47682; load averages: 1.10, 2.41, 2.80up 0+01:01:22
> 12:31:32
> 65 processes: 3 running, 62 sleeping
> CPU states: 4.3% user, 92.2% nice, 2.7% system, 0.8% interrupt, 0.0%
> idle Mem: 122M Active, 282M Inact, 61M Wired, 3040K Cache,
On Sunday, 10 November 2002 at 23:30:44 +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
> Running "fvcool -e -i" works just fine for me in keeping my Athlon CPU cool,
> BUT the output from TOP, shows:
>
> last pid: 2890; load averages: 1.10, 1.07, 1.00
> up 1+02:45:27 23:20:20
>
Running "fvcool -e -i" works just fine for me in keeping my Athlon CPU cool,
BUT the output from TOP, shows:
last pid: 2890; load averages: 1.10, 1.07, 1.00
up 1+02:45:27 23:20:20
66 processes: 2 running, 64 sleeping
CPU states: 1.2% user, 98.4%
19 matches
Mail list logo
