... But I can't send mail because the system
isn't configured for that, and I'm in the dark as how to accomplish it.
Is there somewhere that I can go for info on setting up a simple
configuration which will let me send mail from Mutt? ...
Well, I have had sendmail
In response to FT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... But I can't send mail because the system
isn't configured for that, and I'm in the dark as how to accomplish it.
Is there somewhere that I can go for info on setting up a simple
configuration which will let me send mail
Rem Roberti schrieb:
On 2008.06.23 15:49:59 +, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Rem Roberti schrieb:
I am a running a minimalist setup with FreeBSD 7.0. I would like to be
able to configure my system to allow me to use a text-based mail client
such as Mutt. So far, I am able to receive mail
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish that?
Rem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to FT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Yes. Use exactly the same delivery path as a normal PC/Mac email
client would use. Deliver
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:45:39AM -0700, Rem Roberti wrote:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish that?
Google sendmail smart_host.
I started using postfix many
on 06-23-2008, Rem Roberti wrote:
On 2008.06.23 15:49:59 +, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Rem Roberti schrieb:
I am a running a minimalist setup with FreeBSD 7.0. I would like to be
able to configure my system to allow me to use a text-based mail client
such as Mutt. So far, I am
In response to Rem Roberti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish that?
Without that setting, sendmail will try to send mail _directly_ to its
In response to Rem Roberti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish that?
Oops, I misread your message to be why and not what.
Steps (as root):
1
FT wrote:
... But I can't send mail because the system
isn't configured for that, and I'm in the dark as how to accomplish it.
Is there somewhere that I can go for info on setting up a simple
configuration which will let me send mail from Mutt? ...
Well, I have had
In response to Ethan Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FT wrote:
... But I can't send mail because the system
isn't configured for that, and I'm in the dark as how to accomplish it.
Is there somewhere that I can go for info on setting up a simple
configuration which will let me
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Rem Roberti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish that?
Oops, I misread your message
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:13:50 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Rem Roberti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No. What you really want to do is set smart_host to the outgoing
mail server provided by your ISP.
Please forgive my ignorance here, but how does one accomplish
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Ethan Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FT wrote:
... But I can't send mail because the system
isn't configured for that, and I'm in the dark as how to accomplish it.
Is there somewhere that I can go for info on setting up a simple
configuration
First of all I want to thank all who responded to my question, but I
gotta tell you, if it isn't one thing it's another. I opted to install
msmtp, and it did just what I hoped it would do, working perfectly out
of the box, including TLS. But now...I can't receive mail. As you
recall from my
TLS. But now...I can't receive mail. As you
recall from my first post I indicated that I could receive email, using
mutt and getmail, and indeed I can, on my laptop, which was set up by
someone who knew what they were doing. The computer in
question is a desktop with a virgin installation
I'm running getmail version 4.7.6. My getmailrc file is
i2/home/daf/.getmail}head -40 getmailrc
#
# This file contains various examples of configuration sections to use
# in your getmail rc file. You need one file for each mail account you
# want to retrieve mail from. These files should
headers of individual messages, but this shows
that your message hit the digest without attachment, and others report
no attachment seen in list mail either, as this reply by Paul shows:
Here is a message which has been signed.
There's no sig attached, so it's getting stripped off somewhere
: Problems opening mail on this list
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 15:32:45 -0600 Chad Perrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 16:23:32 -0400 Andrew Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul
can
download them if they want. What I think is happening is that the
attachment is being stripped, and Outlook is looking for it since it can
be inferred that it exists from the MIME type. Of course, the error
should be that the message can't be authenticated (That's what Mail
does, and it's
Here is a message signed with Thunderbird 2 on Windows (ugh...).
--Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
It's documented in the FreeBSD Handbook:
http://freebsd.org/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAILFILTERING
Best regards
Oliver
Good find - it looks like Mail is using application/pkcs7-signature,
while Thunderbird is using , application/x-pkcs7-signature, which is
allowed. According to http
message, I do not have control over which
mail agent I use. That is dictated by the company's IT group. It may
soon be further downgraded to Office 2007, if the rumors I hear are
correct.
Bob McConnell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header is set, but that the corresponding signature
attachment has been stripped:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-117-728128490;
micalg=sha1;
protocol=application/pkcs7-signature
Perhaps your mail client is picking up on this header and
misinterpreting it? What
-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of
your messages, so their SPAM filter appears to be blocking you.
Bob McConnell
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:50 AM
To: Bob McConnell
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems opening mail on this list
On 10-Jun
.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
last name :)
--Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Andrew, maybe you could send a signed message, state in the body
that it was signed, and then I can look at the headers and tell you
what's going on.
Here is a message which has been signed.
--Andrew
opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 16:23:32 -0400 Andrew Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Andrew, maybe you could send a signed message, state in the body
that it was signed, and then I can
=application/pgp-signature; boundary=H1spWtNR+x+ondvy
Content-Disposition: inline
Andrew's is like this:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-746495031; micalg=sha1;
protocol=application/pkcs7-signature
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:23:32
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 15:32:45 -0600 Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My PGP signatures seem to come through just fine, however.
Here's a test of my sig.
--
Paul Schmehl
As if it wasn't already obvious,
my opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
Hi,
I have a 6.3 system running as a mail server, offering imap, pop3 and
smtp. The smtp server can be used from anywhere because all users are
required to authenticate with SMTP AUTH and it supports TLS. This is
using sendmail 8.14.2.
What I would like to do is have any mail submitted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Giorgos
Keramidas
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:06 PM
To: DAve
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
This freebsd-questions thread is approaching a low
I like Qmail. It's not overly difficult to configure, and it's extensible.
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
Postfix rules, Dovecot or cyrus, though dovecot seems more managable
my take running an ISP based mail system
Postfix Definately
Qmail, its ok, in most cases scenerios
Exim - No way
and Dovecot or Cyrus for imaps/imap
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
are downloading a patched source code. Sendmail has been patched
many times, Postfix is patched, Exim is patched. qmail just requires you
apply your own patches. Patching is not a bad thing, shrinkwrap mail
admins applying patches that they do not understand is a bad thing.
heres some interesting
On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:56 -0400
N.J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-29
13:35:27-0400]:
I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers
that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
A third vote for Postfix
patches.
That said I do like postfix I've used it before for smtp relay servers
and its performed like a champ.
Vince
Outback Dingo wrote:
Postfix rules, Dovecot or cyrus, though dovecot seems more managable
my take running an ISP based mail system
Postfix Definately
Qmail, its ok
On May 30, 2008, at 10:39 AM, DAve wrote:
That so much time and effort is spent telling everyone how bad qmail
is still amazes me.
Is it still the case that qmail does not reject mail during SMTP
transaction, but instead will do an accept and then later bounce?
If this is still true
On Friday 30 May 2008 18:09:48 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
exim: If I were setting up a large complicated installation for say an
ISP or a mail hosting system, exim is what I would use. I've heard
people say that they didn't understand the configuration file, but I
don't see what the problem
release of a software package
you are downloading a patched source code. Sendmail has been patched
many times, Postfix is patched, Exim is patched. qmail just requires you
apply your own patches. Patching is not a bad thing, shrinkwrap mail
admins applying patches that they do not understand
please.
Keep in mind that when your download x.x.x release of a software package
you are downloading a patched source code. Sendmail has been patched
many times, Postfix is patched, Exim is patched. qmail just requires you
apply your own patches. Patching is not a bad thing, shrinkwrap mail
admins
I'd personally vouch for Qmail myself.
So would I, for my environment.
Having been an administrator now
for mail servers in general for nearly 15 years, with experience with
most notable mailers, Qmail by far lends itself to be the most highly
configurable mailer assuming you know what you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Procacci
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:21 PM
To: Bob Johnson
Cc: DAve; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 5/30/08, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED
Catalin Miclaus wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Procacci
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:21 PM
To: Bob Johnson
Cc: DAve; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 5/30
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:09:25PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
I agree. No one should use Qmail unless they have read and completely
understand every email-related RFC and have at least two years of
experience running a commercial mail server. Amateurs shouldn't even
consider it.
I used
of the best performing and most
extensible MTAs I have ever used. It is not however, suitable for
those who choose not to understand how mail works. Point and clickers
should stay with Postfix, also a very capable MTA.
This freebsd-questions thread is approaching a low signal/noise ratio
very
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers. I'm interested in both
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:27 -0400
Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
i like postfix with dovecot. (we do imap for about half-a-dozen users.)
both are simple
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Patrick Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been
* Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-29 13:35:27-0400]:
I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
A third vote for Postfix + Dovecot here.
Thomas
--
N.J. Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Etiamsi occiderit me
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:50 PM, N.J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-29
13:35:27-0400]:
I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
A third vote for Postfix + Dovecot
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
Given that, a FreeBSD system
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD
On Thu, 29 May 2008 15:52:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers
Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
FreeBSD == good choice. :)
However, it's been some
On May 29, 2008, at 16:55, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Patrick Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
I am
Montag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got Postfix SMTP server set up on a FreeBSD 7 box. I'm receiving
mail just fine, and I can send mail to my other web accounts (gmail),
but my mail is getting rejected from the mailing lists. Here is the
output from the local mail queue:
host mx1
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of this email is prohibited
when received in error.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:59:08 -0400
Tandon, Sahil \(IM\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Because of the way mx1.free.bsd.org was used (indicating
that someone is trying to describe an error rather than
actually copy it verbatim), I gathered that
my.mywebsite.com was
I've got Postfix SMTP server set up on a FreeBSD 7 box. I'm receiving
mail just fine, and I can send mail to my other web accounts (gmail),
but my mail is getting rejected from the mailing lists. Here is the
output from the local mail queue:
host mx1.free.bsd.org said: my.mywebsite.com: Helo
-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IN A 208.87.33.150
Any thoughts? I typed sendmail -bp to print that, which is curious,
because I'm pretty sure sendmail is not running; Postfix should be handling
everything.
It is actually Postfix behind the scenes! See man mailwrapper(8) and the
contents of /etc/mail/mailer.conf
/security/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 19 May 2008 18:17:32 -0500, Montag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got Postfix SMTP server set up on a FreeBSD 7 box. I'm receiving
mail just fine, and I can send mail to my other web accounts (gmail),
but my mail is getting rejected from the mailing lists. Here is the
output from
refused
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there something I need to configure in telnetd or sendmail to allow
'outside' IP addresses to telnet to the mail server and get a 220 response?
When I 'telnet localhost 25' i get:
email# telnet localhost 25
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.x.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
your mail logs say about those connection
attempts?
Cheers,
-j
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:55:42 -0500
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet
from inside works
On May 12, 2008, at 9:04 AM, brad davison wrote:
But if I try
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:04 AM, brad davison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there something I need to configure in telnetd or sendmail to allow
'outside' IP addresses to telnet to the mail server and get a 220 response?
When I 'telnet localhost 25' i get:
email# telnet localhost 25
.
change your firewall rules to fix it
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet from
inside works
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.x.com.
Escape character
brad davison wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet
from inside works
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.x.com
Vince Hoffman wrote:
brad davison wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet
from inside works
Trying ::1
You can use the SSH key then change it for security reasons.
For directories is working fine, I never tried on the e-mail spool thou.
Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Maness
Sent: Monday, May 05
In response to Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I plan on cutting over a server to new hardware, and I was wondering if
I can add cert based login for root (how do I do this)? This is so that
I can use rsync as root to sync the mail spool and home directories.
Will this work? I am using
I plan on cutting over a server to new hardware, and I was wondering if
I can add cert based login for root (how do I do this)? This is so that
I can use rsync as root to sync the mail spool and home directories.
Will this work? I am using sendmail and wu-imapd.
Thanks,
Chris Maness
Whould it be acceptable to use rsync to sync the mail spool after using
dump/restore onto new hardware? I plan on doing some testing first and
leave the original server up while testing, so the servers mail spool will
be out of sync.
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008, Chris Maness wrote:
Whould it be acceptable to use rsync to sync the mail spool after using
dump/restore onto new hardware? I plan on doing some testing first and
leave the original server up while testing, so the servers mail spool will
be out of sync.
This is easy
I have a FreeBSD web/mail server in a colocation facility. They offer
many fixed and burstable bandwidth options. I am currently using
512Kbits fixed, which limits data transfer to around 64K up and down,
simultaneously. This works okay at the moment, but I'm wondering how
this will hold
At 09:20 AM 4/16/2008, John Almberg wrote:
I have a FreeBSD web/mail server in a colocation facility. They offer
many fixed and burstable bandwidth options. I am currently using
512Kbits fixed, which limits data transfer to around 64K up and down,
simultaneously. This works okay at the moment
it as a Email + DNS server. Then dedicate my main server
as a FreeBSD NFS server.
My question is, has anyone installed a mail + DNS server on a
ALIX/Soekris PC? If so, is it able to handle the load?
I received a Soekris 4801 for Christmas 2005. I put FreeBSD 6 on it.
It's my home network's gateway
. Then dedicate my main server as a FreeBSD NFS
server.
My question is, has anyone installed a mail + DNS server on a ALIX/Soekris
PC? If so, is it able to handle the load?
I received a Soekris 4801 for Christmas 2005. I put FreeBSD 6 on it.
It's my home network's gateway to the outside world
/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-0700
From: Mail System Internal Data [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-IMAP: 1207676934 4064487180 NonJunk $Forwarded Junk
Status: RO
This text is part of the internal format of your mail folder, and is not
a real message
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
601 - 700 of 3286 matches
Mail list logo
