Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anybody still interested in this, should not miss ...
>
> RFC 3676, The Text/Plain Format and DelSp Parameters, Feb 2004
> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3676.txt
Thanks for the tip.
It's a shame that people (e.g., MSFT and its supporters) can't all
a
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Bart Silverstrim thusly...
>
> According to the FAQ, it (f=f) was developed (IIRC) by Qualcomm to
Anybody still interested in this, should not miss ...
RFC 3676, The Text/Plain Format and DelSp Parameters, Feb 2004
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc367
It's not just terminal mail readers that had the problem ... I'm using MS
Outlook 2000 and your problem messages also appeared screwy to me. I don't
have any suggestions to contribute, just this observation.
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[
f and don't have time just now to
investigate, but I'll keep typing anyway. I think the problem is
the same but worse. f=f is probably spec'd in a new draft RFC and
many mail readers don't support it, so your correspondents on a list
list this can't handle it well
ge framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
But sadly, many (most?) mail non-MSFT mail readers don't understand
those WINDOWS-1252 characters even they're properly labeled. So we
see your smart quotes, etc.,
On Mar 18, 2004, at 5:22 PM, Parv wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Bart Silverstrim thusly...
Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
Love to! Your first reply did not wrap around ~72 characters; it
went until the width of my terminal (mutt 1.5.5.1_1 in
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Bart Silverstrim thusly...
>
> Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
Love to! Your first reply did not wrap around ~72 characters; it
went until the width of my terminal (mutt 1.5.5.1_1 in xterm) for
all practical purposes.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
> I was working with someone offlist to see if, in Mail.app, my wrapping
> is affected by the size of the composition window when I send the
> message. I n
On Mar 18, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Yup. I do it manually - just hit that nice big Enter/Return key
between
a couple of word when I get out around that far.
Which is why, on my mailer, quoting you gives a full line then one word
then a line...it kind of reminds me of a person I
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > 1) Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be
> > easily read.
>
> I'm using Mail.app on OS X 10.3.3, and someone offering some advice
> from this list also
> asked me to fix line wrapping. I checked and checke
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
[ ... ]
Out of curiosity, what email program are you using that it's not showing
up? I thought the FAQ said that many term emailers support the flowed
format...essentially my hitting "enter" at the end of each line is making
it more difficult for the format=flowed-speaking
On Mar 17, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
1) Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be
easily read.
I'm using Mail.app on OS X 10.3.3, and someone offering some advice
from this list also
asked me to fix line wrapping. I checked and checked, but found
nothing in M
12 matches
Mail list logo
