Hi,
After a binary update to 8.3 i'm seeing wired memory increase steadily
over the course of about a week, after which point i need to reboot the
machine as it starts swapping.
Several other boxes were updated at the same time, and all ports rebuilt
post upgrade.
FreeBSD x.x.com 8.3-RELEAS
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 13:33 +0100, J B wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > ...
> >> I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> >> the following is a true state
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> ...
>> I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
>> the following is a true statement:
>>
>> a page is accounted for in active + in
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> > the following is a true statement:
> >
> > a page is accounted for in active + inact
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:07 -0500
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
> >* Resident corresponds to a subset of the pages above: those
> > pages which actually occupy physical/core memory. Notably pages may
> > appear in size but not appear in resident
Thanks for your email, Chuck.
> > Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident
> > memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active +
> > inactive lists.
>
> Hmm...if a process gets swapped out entirely, the pages for it will be moved
> to the cache list, flushed, and
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
[ ... ]
My current (probably quite simplistic) understanding of the FreeBSD
virtual memory system is that, for each process as reported by top:
* Size corresponds to the total size of all the text pages for the
process (those belonging to
On 26/11/2010 18:24, Jack Raats wrote:
> It looks like that there may be a memory leak of my swap space with one
> of the processes that is running.
> Big question: How can I determine which process is responsible.
>
> Any suggestions?
Look for a process with a really big SIZE in
It looks like that there may be a memory leak of my swap space with one of
the processes that is running.
Big question: How can I determine which process is responsible.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Jack
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
89 0 0 0 478 2 0 0 27 957 580
> avm + free adds up to only 3 Gb.
> Where is the rest of the memory ??
There are a lot other uses for memory. Try running "top" a couple of
time when you seem to detect the leak and add together the various
categories of memory.
&g
leak, how to find what causes the memory leak?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:43:57 -0600, Modulok wrote:
> Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
>
> man 3 getenv
>
> "Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
> value to the same name will result in
List,
Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
man 3 getenv
"Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
value to the same name will result in a memory leak. The FreeBSD seman-
tics for these functions (namely, that th
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:56:25PM -0700, Modulok wrote:
> I get the feeling Conky 1.4.8 (the sysutil), or one of the libs it
> links against, has a memory leak. I do not have any hard evidence yet
> (like a patch to fix it), but the memory consumption slowly climbs to
> what a
I get the feeling Conky 1.4.8 (the sysutil), or one of the libs it
links against, has a memory leak. I do not have any hard evidence yet
(like a patch to fix it), but the memory consumption slowly climbs to
what appears to be excessive. I did read the manual page about:
"Conky is gene
In the last episode (Mar 15), Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said:
> Hello,
>
> I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
> clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
>
> The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it.
> *sigh*
> This happened since like 6 months I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:55:24AM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
> clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
>
> The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it.
> *sigh*
> This happened since lik
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it. *sigh*
This happened since like 6 months I don't know why? it was okay before that.
here is the top info
last pid: 790;
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Roger Olofsson wrote:
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it.
[ ... ]
My question is how do I track down a possible memory leak and would
there be a tool to monitor
Dear Mailing List,
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it. This is
appearing when starting vlc from shell playing a playlist and streaming
video over udp to LAN like so:
vlc --loop playlist.m3u -
On 8/30/06, Tom Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much do
In response to Tom Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
> memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
> considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much documentation regarding this subject.
It has been reported
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, "Robert Leftwich"
>
> I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o
> size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the
> extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point):
Oops, just noticed
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:07 -0500, "Charles Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote:
>
> Possibly your database is using lots of SysV shared memory, which
> would explain why "wired" is going up so much, otherwise perhaps
> something in the kern
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote:
After 1 dataset it is:
Mem: 107M Active, 1919M Inact, 158M Wired, 16K Cache, 214M Buf,
570M
Free
Swap: 4068M Total, 4068M Free
which totals 2968M
While running on the 6th dataset:
Mem: 1032M Active, 1045M Inact, 260M Wired
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500, "David Scheidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>
> I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived
> Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's
> python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But
> the proc
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:40 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and
Python and C :-(
I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived
Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's
python, some module, or the
gt; > There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak
> > that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are
> > available now.
> >
>
> Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and
> Python and C :-(
I&#
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, "Erik Norgaard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Do you run other applications also?
>
> There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak
> that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are
>
Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse
real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB)
avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB)
What's the best way to track down more information as to the cause of
this problem?
Do you run other applications also?
There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a m
Robert Leftwich wrote:
[ ... ]
> Mem: 274M Active, 227M Inact, 263M Wired, 95M Cache, 214M Buf, 4536K
> Free
> Swap: 4068M Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse
>
> real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB)
> avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB)
>
> What's the best way to track down more information a
After running some number crunching for the last twelve hours I noticed
my box starting to use swap. Given that it has 4gb in it (of which 3gb
is available, see my other email for that issue) and I know that the app
never uses more than around 1gb I was surprised. Looking at the numbers
from top I
I keep getting errors in my apache error logs with the following:
Is this a problem with PHP?
/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.1.1/ext/xml/xml.c(695) :
Freeing 0x0882
B624 (32 bytes),
script=/usr/local/www/groupoffice-com-2.14-FINAL-4/modules/phps
ysinfo/index.php
/usr/ports/lang/php5/
Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This machine sat unattended all day. What could be causing the drastic
> drop in Free memory? Is this normal? When I actually use the machine,
> it's even worse... Almost all of my RAM goes from Free to other
> various states, Mostly Inactive, even after I've clos
Okay, here's the background. I thought top was displaying my memory
stats oddly, so I ran a little test. I rebooted the pc, logged into the
console as a normal user, and ran top. I did this at around midnight
last night / this morning. I let it run until I got home from work,
(6:15 today) So th
here was a memory leak reported in Perl 5.8.2 but
I've found nothing on 5.8.4. Has anyone else experienced this with
threaded perl?
Regards,
Chris
Chris Miller
NetGate Internet
An iStrata Company
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://li
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:38:49PM -0700, whitevamp wrote:
> sorry if this quistion has allread been asked and awnsered..
>
> i got noticeing that my system was runnung out of mem so i did top and this is what
> i found
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
>
> 9936 da
sorry if this quistion has allread been asked and awnsered..
i got noticeing that my system was runnung out of mem so i did top and this is what i
found
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
9936 dave -22 0 219M 98M RUN 16:03 46.04% 46.04% netscape-bin
15211 dave 31 0 205
Hello everyone!
I have just noticed that ethereal eats a lot of memory.
Currently it has no capture running and no file loaded.
Previous analyzied file was about 56Mbytes. But it was
closed. Is this behavior normal?
Mem: 111M Active, 15M Inact, 46M Wired, 6820K Cache, 28M Buf, 564K Free
Swap: 38
> That does seem excessive. From my -CURRENT system (admittedly
> up less that 24 hours):
>
> Mem: 179M Active, 190M Inact, 93M Wired, 25M Cache, 60M Buf, 7044K
Indeed :\
After a reboot, it was great. The system became all responsive again,
and it didn't swap anymore (applications were actually
Woon Wai Keen @ doubleukay.com writes:
> The output from top (after stopping services) reads:
>
> Mem: 12M Active, 10M Inact, 451M Wired, 1364K Cache, 59M Buf, 11M Free
> Swap: 1024M Total, 15M Used, 1009M Free, 1% Inuse, 12K In
>
> I noticed that the amount of 'wired' memory before and af
Hi list,
I have been running 5.2.1 on a Celeron with 512MB RAM for nearly two
months straight, but have been experiencing heavy swapping these past
few days. In a last-ditch attempt, I stopped all the services hoping to
reclaim the memory somehow.
The output from top (after stopping services)
In the last episode (Apr 12), jitendra pande said:
> I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
>
> Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
dmalloc in ports (ports/devel/dmalloc) is very useful for catching
leaks.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hi ,
I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
Looking for an early reply.
Thanks
Jitendra
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
_
tty Pc ttyv4
> 872 v5 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5
> 873 v6 Is+0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6
> 874 v7 Is+0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7
> 520 con- I 0:02.81 /usr/local/sbin/snmpd
> 534 con- I 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mys
VSZ.
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Jorn Argelo wrote:
> Are you sure that there isn't anything else running? Why don't you give us
> an ps -ax output? I don't think there's a memory leak in 5.1, since I've
> seen running 5.1 just fine on a PE2650 with 2 GB RAM. You should
Are you sure that there isn't anything else running? Why don't you give us
an ps -ax output? I don't think there's a memory leak in 5.1, since I've
seen running 5.1 just fine on a PE2650 with 2 GB RAM. You shouldn't
rely on top too much acually. Vmstat is a better
(I'm not a member of the list; please Cc me on any replies.)
We're running Apache 1.3.28 on a 5.1-RELEASE machine. It's a Dell PE 2650
w/ 2GB RAM. The site contains a lot of large files (multi-megabyte) -
otherwise there's nothing unusual running.
The Active memory use, according to top, seems ra
Hi,
Woops, sorry about my other "asdf" spam email.. :-)
This might be a stupid/obvious question but dmalloc is reporting that I have
a memory leak in the following (test) program and I don't know why:
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char
50 matches
Mail list logo
