Missing man pages: gnupg

2009-07-12 Thread Daniel Underwood
Coming from Linux, I'm accustomed to using gpg. I installed the gnupg port (which I assume is virtually the same as Linux gpg). Doing $ man gnupg returns nothing. Doing $ which gnupg reveals that the port (or at least the binary) is in fact installed. But where are the gnupg man pages? If truly

Re: Missing man pages: gnupg

2009-07-12 Thread Pierre Guinoiseau
gnupg's binary is gpg2, and man gpg2 exists. :) Daniel Underwood wrote: Coming from Linux, I'm accustomed to using gpg. I installed the gnupg port (which I assume is virtually the same as Linux gpg). Doing $ man gnupg returns nothing. Doing $ which gnupg reveals that the port (or at

Re: Missing man pages: gnupg

2009-07-12 Thread Manolis Kiagias
Daniel Underwood wrote: Coming from Linux, I'm accustomed to using gpg. I installed the gnupg port (which I assume is virtually the same as Linux gpg). Doing $ man gnupg returns nothing. Doing $ which gnupg reveals that the port (or at least the binary) is in fact installed. But where are

Re: Missing man pages: gnupg

2009-07-12 Thread Daniel Underwood
gnupg's binary is gpg2, and man gpg2 exists. :) I see. Thanks, that works. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Missing man pages: gnupg

2009-07-12 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sun 12 Jul 2009 at 08:23:59 PDT Daniel Underwood wrote: gnupg's binary is gpg2, and man gpg2 exists. :) I see. Thanks, that works. For a list of all the files installed by a package, including manpages, use pkg_list -L packagename If you're not sure which version of the package you