Hi guys, Been a while since i've had need to post to the list :)
I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours
and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a
per-minute basis and i've been trying to use netstat for this
On 11/01/2012 11:24, Mike Woods wrote:
> Hi guys, Been a while since i've had need to post to the list :)
>
> I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours and
> I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a
> per-minute
On 11.01.2012 13:24, Mike Woods wrote:
>
> I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours
> and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a
> per-minute basis and i've been trying to use netstat for this (count
> now - co
Quoting Matthew Seaman :
ntop?
I considered this but what I really need is something I can run purley
from the command line "one shoot" like netstat (but without counter
resetting problems)
Also, Googling for 'netflow freebsd' produces a lot of interesting
looking pages.
I've had a q
On 11/01/2012 13:47, Mike Woods wrote:
>> Also, Googling for 'netflow freebsd' produces a lot of interesting
>> looking pages.
>
> I've had a quick look and that might be usefull, I still need to figure
> out how to get the data out in a form that's usefull to me but it has
> promise :)
Another p
On 11/01/2012 12:07, Ott Köstner wrote:
> On 11.01.2012 13:24, Mike Woods wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours
>> > and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a
>> > per-min
Quoting Matthew Seaman :
On 11/01/2012 13:47, Mike Woods wrote:
Also, Googling for 'netflow freebsd' produces a lot of interesting
looking pages.
I've had a quick look and that might be usefull, I still need to figure
out how to get the data out in a form that's usefull to me but it has
prom
Здравствуйте, Mike.
Вы писали 11 января 2012 г., 13:24:00:
MW> Hi guys, Been a while since i've had need to post to the list :)
MW> I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours
MW> and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be meas
On 11.01.2012 16:57, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes -- mrtg is nice, but it relies on the snmp interface counters, and
in this case with Gb traffic levels a 32bit counter will wrap in a few
minutes. mrtg samples the interface counter every 5 minutes IIRC, so
would probably be confused by that wrap-a
In the last episode (Jan 11), Ott Köstner said:
> On 11.01.2012 16:57, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Yes -- mrtg is nice, but it relies on the snmp interface counters, and
> > in this case with Gb traffic levels a 32bit counter will wrap in a few
> > minutes. mrtg samples the interface counter every 5
On 11/01/12 09:24, Mike Woods wrote:
Hi guys, Been a while since i've had need to post to the list :)
I'm trying to gather network throughput information on a box of ours
and I'm having a little problem, the throughput is to be measured on a
per-minute basis and i'v
lowing lines to my kernel conf
options DEVICE_POLLING
options HZ=1000
and modified /etc/sysctl.conf by adding
kern.polling.enable=1
and now ncftp shows about 8 MB/s. (Recompile, reboot, etc)
Perhaps I'm dreaming, but shouldn't I be getting better network
throughp
Someone PLEASE help me figure this out?
I am baffled.
I have 2 100% identical IBM servers. Same everything. Purchased at the same
time/date.
P4-3.06
512MB ram
18GB scsi u160 10Krpm drive
One machine runs FreeBSD-5.2 and the other Solaris9x86.
FTP transfers via machine to machine or via LAN cli
Hi list,
About 4 days ago I downloaded 5.3-RELEASE (.iso) from ftp.nl. at about
6mB/s from a server I have on a .nl provider. Today I wanted to do some
testing, and while downloading that same ISO (which I downloaded at 6
megabytes/s) from two different servers on the same subnet, the best I got
w
I have upgraded my home "server" to 5.4 from 5.2.1 and after some time
I've noticed that network throughput is very low (about 4MB/s).
I'm not expert on this field but I have checked some settings (sysctl,
netstat) and couldn't find anything suspicious. I have second
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:38:48 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> About 4 days ago I downloaded 5.3-RELEASE (.iso) from ftp.nl. at about
> 6mB/s from a server I have on a .nl provider. Today I wanted to do some
> testing, and while downloading that same ISO (whi
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's happening here? I can download at 1mBps from my crappy P200 MMX
> w/ freebsd 4.10 at my lan. This server is a Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz w/ 2GB ram
> and a decent hdd. It should saturate the 100mbps, but won't go past
> 130kB/s.
That's very slow.
> C
17 matches
Mail list logo
