> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
> From: woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
> To: millenia2...@hotmail.com
> CC: f...@bomgardner.net; ch...@monochrome.org; cho...@charter.net;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Portsnap vs CSup
>
> >
> > compiling the kernel on that could take sev
> >
> for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
> it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
>
> Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
I never used gnome or KDE on it, ran Blackbox insted.
of course it's fast.
and even slower machines like 486/33 w
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:12:12 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh
wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
> > for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
> > it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
> >
> > Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
>
>
> I
