On Monday 24 September 2007 20:01:51 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I
> search for the file with locate.
For future ref: locate uses a cache, built weekly using periodic(8). Find
searches the disk live, so locate is faster but can b
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
>
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
> > /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.
>
>
> what's the output of:
> ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc
gcc-4.2.2_20070905
gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gccmakedep-1.0.2
> and:
> find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'
/usr/local/lib/compat/
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:08:28 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> > >
> > > No, the FreeBSD jdk15
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
>
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
>
> No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get
uninstalled after buil
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
--
"What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so
that we wouldn't have a fat, insensitive government running our
country. Nice try anyway, Georg
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:43:39 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> this messages:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6"
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Christian Baer wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
>
> > I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
> > needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
> > went ok.
>
> How did you
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
> needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
> went ok.
How did you do that?
Regards,
Chris
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Marco Beishuizen writes:
> >
> > After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> > this messages:
> >
> > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> > by "javaldx"
> >
> > Compiling
Marco Beishuizen writes:
>
> After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> this messages:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
>
> Compiling and installation went fine. Also, libstdc++.so.6 is on
> my
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
by "javaldx"
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
by "pagein"
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
13 matches
Mail list logo
