Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

2011-02-07 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:12:45 -0800 David Brodbeck articulated: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bill Moran > wrote: > > Also, I'm having trouble understanding how people like that get > > grants to do work like that.  On the one hand, they obviously know > > enough about cryptography to make imp

Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

2011-02-07 Thread David Brodbeck
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bill Moran wrote: > Also, I'm having trouble understanding how people like that get grants > to do work like that.  On the one hand, they obviously know enough about > cryptography to make improvements.  On the other hand, they can't seem > to get a grip on the fact

Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

2011-02-06 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 08:42:27AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > Also, I'm having trouble understanding how people like that get grants > to do work like that. On the one hand, they obviously know enough about > cryptography to make improvements. On the other hand, they can't seem > to get a grip

Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

2011-02-06 Thread Bill Moran
In response to kellyremo : > https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg > > "SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network > performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. > These buffers often end up acting as a bott

OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

2011-02-06 Thread kellyremo
https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg "SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network throughput of SCP,