that
OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3:
However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE.
I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to
build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the
linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
There's been quite a few reports of people having trouble getting past
the java tools install which is needed to build the port. Unless that
challence is interesting in itself, it's probably more convenient to
download and install a binary
Dave Horsfall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't read
JP)...
OOPS. Looks like I did not look too closely. It certainly looks like
they haven't gotten around to
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't read
JP)...
OOPS. Looks like I did not look too closely. It certainly looks like
they haven't
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump through?
===Verifying install for /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac in
not want to compile OpenOffice if you're not willing to jump
through hoops. It is the biggest beast in the ports tree afaik.
That said, there is a WITHOUT_JAVA knob for it. Try that and see if you need
to jump through this particular hoop again.
--Stijn
--
Light travels faster than sound. That's
read
JP)...
It's not really surprizing 1.1.4 is built from the the port
editors/openoffice-1.1-devel, not open-office-1.1.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
bloody
hoops do we have to jump through?
You really do not want to compile OpenOffice if you're not willing to jump
through hoops. It is the biggest beast in the ports tree afaik.
That said, there is a WITHOUT_JAVA knob for it. Try that and see if you
need to jump through this particular hoop
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:37 AM
To: Stijn Hoop; Dave Horsfall; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice?
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:58, Stijn Hoop wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 13:18, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't
On 04 Jan 2005 07:40:23 +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice, for
which a freebsd binary is not produced
because
you need to know that:
1. You need the linprocfs mounted to make java/linux-sun-jdk14
2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice
(even though this is not listed as a dependency).
Note: this is from my memory, which is not always 100% what it should be.
--
Tabor
through?
I did it, and it wasn't hard, just confusing. It is confusing because
you need to know that:
1. You need the linprocfs mounted to make java/linux-sun-jdk14
2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice
(even though this is not listed as a dependency
before you try to build OpenOffice
(even though this is not listed as a dependency).
Note: this is from my memory, which is not always 100% what it should be.
Installing native jdk14 isn't that hard, as long as you follow the
instructions to the letter.
I've tried to compile openoffice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 21:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked
before), but this time it bombed near the end
through?
I did it, and it wasn't hard, just confusing. It is confusing because
you need to know that:
1. You need the linprocfs mounted to make java/linux-sun-jdk14
2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice
(even though this is not listed as a dependency
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:21:17PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:04:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked
before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip
Is there a native 5.3 port of OpenOffice, or does it still have to run
under Linux compatability?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.johncon.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:36:53PM -, John Conover wrote:
Is there a native 5.3 port of OpenOffice, or does it still have to run
under Linux compatability?
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice, for
which a freebsd binary is not produced by sun?
There's been quite a few reports of people having trouble getting past
Hi,
I've got OpenOffice 1.1.3 installed. It is nice for the free office, but its
text area fonts are really ugly. I can type bold text in KMail and it looks
better. Firefox HTML is better. I know that OpenOffice fonts are not good
in Windows, but it is even worse on FreeBSD.
Glyph
Is openoffice available for BSD 5.2.1? Pkg_add -r grumbles that it
isn't.
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.johncon.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
John Conover wrote:
Is openoffice available for BSD 5.2.1? Pkg_add -r grumbles that it
isn't.
John,
there is a link on this page
http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/
where you can download the packages. You can then use pkg_add to install
them. Maybe you can even have pkg_add fetch them for you
Dave Horsfall wrote:
I'm trying to compile OpenOffice 1.1 for FreeBSD 4.10 (may as well
exercise the lap-top). After grabbing all the Linuxy bits for Java JDK14,
I now find it wants a Solaris library under /compat/svr4/lib (libc.so.2 or
similar), and this is found only on a Solaris/86 CD
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Tabor Kelly wrote:
How I got Openoffice 1.1.3 to compile on my laptop:
portinstall java/jdk14
portinstall openoffice
note: 'portinstall java/jdk14' installs the natively compiled FreeBSD version
of Java, and as a dependency (for the build only) installs the linux JDK
/com_sun_star_lib_conne
ctions_pipe_PipeConnection.obj'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/
OOo_1.1.3_src/jurt/source/pipe
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
*** Error code 255
Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:08 +0200, lordbad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install it from the ports.Here is most the error output:
snip errors
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/
OOo_1.1.3_src/jurt/source/pipe
dmake: Error code 1
Simon Burke wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:08 +0200, lordbad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install it from the ports.Here is most the error output:
snip errors
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/
OOo_1.1.3_src/jurt/source/pipe
I'm trying to compile OpenOffice 1.1 for FreeBSD 4.10 (may as well
exercise the lap-top). After grabbing all the Linuxy bits for Java JDK14,
I now find it wants a Solaris library under /compat/svr4/lib (libc.so.2 or
similar), and this is found only on a Solaris/86 CD, which of course
to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
and i've since made clean.
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully
I'm getting the following error when trying to build openoffice-1.1 from
ports on a recently cvsup'd box:
snip
rm
-f ../../unxfbsd.pro/bin/odk645/examples/OLE/delphi/InsertTables/SampleUI.dfm
/dev/null
tr -d \015 ../../examples/OLE/delphi/InsertTables/SampleUI.dfm
../../unxfbsd.pro/bin/odk645
On Monday 06 December 2004 04:23 pm, Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i
Simon Burke wrote:
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
During the last month or so, I've built OpenOffice 1.1.3 successfully
twice on my RELENG_5 box, so it must
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:37:14 -0800, Tabor Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant
Hi Simon,
Yeah thats the error message i got also.
I had to wade through 45Kb of posted error messages to read your me
too. Please try and trim all irrelevant and not-so-relevant stuff from
the original message next time.
Thank you... Nico
___
[EMAIL
Simon Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
it should compile cleanly if you've set up the required java magic
first. At least
On 07 Dec 2004 14:25:54 +, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
No it's
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:37:14 -0800, Tabor Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
and i've since made clean.
Does anyone
Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
and i've since made
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
I am running a 5.3 stable box. Works fine. I want to put openoffice
on it, but the ports are all either broken or marked as broken.
Should I go back to StarOffice, or just try to slog it out?
tia, cn.
--
This line blank left intentionally
Warning: Due
* Chris Neustrup [2004-11-18 18:55 -0800]
I am running a 5.3 stable box. Works fine. I want to put openoffice
on it, but the ports are all either broken or marked as broken.
Should I go back to StarOffice, or just try to slog it out?
editors/openoffice-1.1 is not marked as broken on my
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice 1.1.3 from the ports, but keep getting the
following error message :
checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h... no
configure: error: Could not compile basic X program.
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please direct the output of the failure
4797722 465547451%/usr
/dev/ad0s3d253678 195496 3788884%/var
linprocfs 4 4 0 100%/usr/compat/linux/proc
PEARLBSD# pkg_add -r openoffice
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/openoffice.tbz...
/var
253678 108 233276 0%/tmp
/dev/ad0s3f 10275212 4797722 465547451%/usr
/dev/ad0s3d253678 195496 3788884%/var
linprocfs 4 4 0 100%/usr/compat/linux/proc
PEARLBSD# pkg_add -r openoffice
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD
I'm attempting to build the OpenOffice-1.1 port on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. I've seen the
ELF error before, notably when I try to view some PDFs it complains that type 3 is
not known.
The output of brandelf -l is:
known ELF types are: FreeBSD(9) Linux(3) Solaris(6) SVR4(0)
Anyhow, here
Hi all
I just installed OpenOffice 1.1.3, via a package, on -CURRENT from a few
days ago.
pkg_add complained about not being able to find XFree86 and imake 4.3.0 (I
think) and perl - which is odd because I do have perl installed - so I
used -f to force it. However, when I try and run openoffice
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:24:34AM +0100, Markie wrote:
Hi all
I just installed OpenOffice 1.1.3, via a package, on -CURRENT from a few
days ago.
pkg_add complained about not being able to find XFree86 and imake 4.3.0 (I
think) and perl - which is odd because I do have perl installed - so
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Markie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: OpenOffice 1.1.3 package
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:24:34AM +0100, Markie wrote:
Hi all
I just installed OpenOffice 1.1.3
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 10:34:30PM +0100, Markie wrote:
This must be an old package, because 4.3.0 hasn't been in the ports
collection for some months now.
Kris
Do you think that might be the cause of my infinate 100% CPU loop thing?
Should I try hunting around for something done using
Hi. i just installed OpenOffice 1.1.2 from a package;
i need to work with some PowerPoint presentations and
it seemed the best way.
It looked like the install went fine, but now i cant
seem to actually do anything with it. When it runs,
the initial screen comes up but if i select the open
dialog
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:56:21 -0400
Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it posible compile openoffice without install java
i do this
%make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files
apache-ant etc etc etc i can not download the java files due
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 08:57:12AM +0530, Subhro wrote:
Well first of all if you are someone who had recently stepped into the
FreeBSD world then you should NOT be using Beta software. Coming back
to your point the command you should be using is
make -DWITHOUT_JAVA=yes
I'm sorry, but that is
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:53:23 +0100, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 08:57:12AM +0530, Subhro wrote:
Well first of all if you are someone who had recently stepped into the
FreeBSD world then you should NOT be using Beta software. Coming back
to your point the
is it posible compile openoffice without install java
i do this
%make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files
apache-ant etc etc etc i can not download the java files due to
restrictions of Sun with my domain .cu what can i do binaries of
openoffice does
it.
Regards
S.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:56:21 -0400, Osmany Guirola Cruz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it posible compile openoffice without install java
i do this
%make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files
apache-ant etc etc etc i can not download the java files due
Hi,
I have just installed Openoffice on my server that has a number of diskless
terminals booting from it. Openoffice run on the server but not on the
terminals. I have other applications that runs on the terminals without any
problem. Any idea?
Regards
Livhu Tshisikule
questions@ is probably the right forum for this...
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:36:05 -0400
From: epilogue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unable to set accelerator keys
hello all,
i've got the english openoffice-1.1.2 package for 4.x installed. i
Hello all,
I do a cvsup on ports-all daily, and the other day I noticed that
openoffice-1.1.2 is being report as out of date and that the port has 1.1.3:
openoffice-1.1.2 needs updating (port has 1.1.3)
So I did a '# portupgrade openoffice'
It seemed to compile and install
use ?
The same question applies to the OpenOffice 1.1.2
install you did after that.
These things dont seem to be in the ports
collection, and I dont know if they are
considered packages or something different.
Thanks for your patience - I am still struggling
to come to grips
Peter Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HI,
I have trouble getting my openoffice installation to run
on fbsd 4.10. (subject of previous questions)
I just remembered that I installed it without the java JRE option,
because I didnt have the slightest idea where to get that
(or even what
Peter,
JRE is the acronym for Java Runtime Environment.
Because java is an interpreted language, a java
program needs an interpreter to be able to translate a
java program into a machine readable form. Perhaps
some of the openoffice.org's functionality were
develop using java, maybe that's the
actually ran. Geesh!
Michael Collette wrote:
After running through a stack of little pitfalls in trying to get a
diskless client running from a 5-CURRENT server I'm down to the last nasty
here. Hopefully someone might be able to help out.
OpenOffice apparently doesn't want to run across
Hi people..
simple question
Where can i find a binary distribution of openoffice for FreeBSD
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people..
simple question
Where can i find a binary distribution of openoffice for FreeBSD
From the OpenOffice.org web site, downloads section.
Last I checked, there were prebuilt packages for FreeBSD 4 and 5.
--
Bill Moran
Potential
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:30:47 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people..
simple question
Where can i find a binary distribution of openoffice for FreeBSD
From the OpenOffice.org web site, downloads section.
Last I checked
HI,
I have trouble getting my openoffice installation to run
on fbsd 4.10. (subject of previous questions)
I just remembered that I installed it without the java JRE option,
because I didnt have the slightest idea where to get that
(or even what it is)
Can someone tell me where to get the java
--- Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi people..
simple question
Where can i find a binary distribution of openoffice
for FreeBSD
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
--- Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi people..
simple question
Where can i find a binary distribution of openoffice
for FreeBSD
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
After running through a stack of little pitfalls in trying to get a diskless
client running from a 5-CURRENT server I'm down to the last nasty here.
Hopefully someone might be able to help out.
OpenOffice apparently doesn't want to run across an NFS share unless a
link_relative option
FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 28 19:38:50 CEST 2004, cvsup late June 27th.
Build of Openoffice-1.1 stops at:
checking for XShmCreateImage in -lXext... yes
checking for X11/extensions/XShm.h... yes
checking for XieFloGeometry in -lXIE... no
checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h... no
configure
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 28 19:38:50 CEST 2004, cvsup late June
27th.
Build of Openoffice-1.1 stops at:
checking for XShmCreateImage in -lXext... yes
checking for X11/extensions/XShm.h... yes
checking for XieFloGeometry in -lXIE... no
checking for X11/extensions
I can't believe how much of a pain installing Open-Office 2.0 from the
ports collection is. The port fails and tells me I need to download a
file from Sun because of licensing restrictions, so I download the file
it tells me too. Then start the compiling over again. Once again, I need
a different
On Saturday 19 June 2004 07:32 pm, Bruce wrote:
I can't believe how much of a pain installing Open-Office 2.0 from the
ports collection is. The port fails and tells me I need to download a
file from Sun because of licensing restrictions...
Be sure you're distinguishing between OOo and Java.
Does anybody know what happened to OpenOffice-1.1 port?
I just did a portinstall on it last week with no problems, but now the port is marked
as broken for FreeBSD 5.x.
** 'editors/openoffice-1.1' is marked as IGNORE:
is marked as broken: Does not compile on 4.x (tries to link
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Duane Winner wrote:
Does anybody know what happened to OpenOffice-1.1 port?
I just did a portinstall on it last week with no problems, but now the port is
marked as broken for FreeBSD 5.x.
** 'editors/openoffice-1.1' is marked as IGNORE
Anyone have any luck installing OpenOffice-1.1 for FreeBSD 4.9?
I only get the error below after getting all the bits from the sun site for
the java install that OpenOffice precipitates.
Java HotSpot (TM) Client VM warning: Can't detect initial thread stack
location
In all the post
Andrew Firestone wrote:
Anyone have any luck installing OpenOffice-1.1 for FreeBSD 4.9?
I only get the error below after getting all the bits from the sun site for
the java install that OpenOffice precipitates.
Java HotSpot (TM) Client VM warning: Can't detect initial thread stack
location
One option is to download a package off the OpenOffice.org site and install
that ... the only difficulty there is finding the older dependent packages
and getting them installed first.
But the OpenOffice Package would still build the Java stuff wouldn't it or
do you think the issue
Just checked out the status of the port and it looks like it is broken.
www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1
-Original Message-
From: Bill Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2004 12:14 PM
To: Andrew Firestone
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Trying to install openoffice from ports tree cvsupped yesterday and failing.
I don't want to install from a package, as I get an icky mess between gtk 1
(which the openoffice package wants) and gtk 2 (which the latest gnome wants)
Suggestions?
FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, when I try to build, it stops
On Saturday 08 May 2004 00:24, Bill Moran wrote:
Trying to install openoffice from ports tree cvsupped yesterday and
failing. I don't want to install from a package, as I get an icky mess
between gtk 1 (which the openoffice package wants) and gtk 2 (which the
latest gnome wants)
Suggestions
Christian Hiris wrote:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 00:24, Bill Moran wrote:
Trying to install openoffice from ports tree cvsupped yesterday and
failing. I don't want to install from a package, as I get an icky mess
between gtk 1 (which the openoffice package wants) and gtk 2 (which the
latest gnome
On Saturday 08 May 2004 04:40, Bill Moran wrote:
Christian Hiris wrote:
On Saturday 08 May 2004 00:24, Bill Moran wrote:
Trying to install openoffice from ports tree cvsupped yesterday and
failing. I don't want to install from a package, as I get an icky mess
between gtk 1 (which
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
this sounds like your openoffice package was built on freebsd 4.x.
on freebsd 5.2 libc_r version is 5 (libc_r.so.5). you might
try to install the compat4x
On Monday 03 May 2004 05:06, Derrick wrote:
I am attempting to run the precompiled version of OO-1.1_0.1, but am
having trouble on my 5.2 system. Whenever I try to run the setup, I get
this:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared
On Monday 03 May 2004 13:50, sd wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2004 09:27 am, Malcolm Kay wrote:
I recently installed openoffice1.1 [...]
I am using a high resolution
1600x1200 display and the fonts used by the base UI are
are crisp and clear but rather too small for my aging eyes.
I'm
this sounds like your openoffice package was built on freebsd 4.x.
on freebsd 5.2 libc_r version is 5 (libc_r.so.5). you might try to install the
compat4x package. it's a version 4 compatibility package, which allows you to
run 4.x binaries on 5.x systems. however, i would prefer to fetch an
up
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
which leads me to believe I am missing a dependant install.
I looked
at the dependancies and I thought I saw them all listed under
pkg_info, so I would
I am attempting to run the precompiled version of OO-1.1_0.1, but am
having trouble on my 5.2 system. Whenever I try to run the setup, I get
this:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.4 not found
which leads me to
On Friday 23 April 2004 09:27 am, Malcolm Kay wrote:
I recently installed openoffice1.1 [...]
I am using a high resolution
1600x1200 display and the fonts used by the base UI are
are crisp and clear but rather too small for my aging eyes.
I'm refering here to the fonts used in the Menu bars,
For larger icons in OpenOffice.org:
Tools menu- Options...- OpenOffice.org- View- Icon Size- Large
-Steve D
NM US
--
Whatever it is the government does, sensible Americans would prefer
that the government do it to somebody else.
I recently installed openoffice1.1 under FBSD 4.9-release.
The capability is quite impressive and it genereally seems
to behave very well.
But I do have a problem: I am using a high resolution
1600x1200 display and the fonts used by the base UI are
are crisp and clear but rather too small for
Hello,
Another good time with OpenOffice. For some reason, it appears as
though everything involving JAVA on this FreeBSD machine craps out and
crashes for one crazy reason or another...can anyone help me make sense
of this crash message while doing a make install?
ERROR
/AtomicLong.java
you start with
OOo.
Cheers,
Jorn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. M. Los
Sent: zondag 18 april 2004 22:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
Hello,
Another good time with OpenOffice. For some
::-Original Message-
::From: Jorn Argelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 4:39 PM
::To: Ralph M. Los
::Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: RE: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::
::
::
::You might want to consider preinstalling the native Java
::version
- Original Message -
From: Ralph M. Los [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jorn Argelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::-Original Message-
::From: Jorn Argelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sunday 18 April 2004 05:38 pm, Bryan S. Bursey wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ralph M. Los [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jorn Argelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::-Original
::-Original Message-
::From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:58 PM
::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Cc: Bryan S. Bursey; Ralph M. Los; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: Re: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::
::
::On Sunday 18 April 2004 05:38 pm, Bryan S
401 - 500 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
