Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-28 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Mike Jeays wrote on Thu 27.Sep'12 at 22:56:42 -0400 ] I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is

Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-28 Thread Rares Aioanei
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400 Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote: I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5

Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-28 Thread dweimer
On 2012-09-28 07:03, Rares Aioanei wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400 Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote: I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an

Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-28 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote: I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected?

Re: PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-28 Thread dweimer
On 2012-09-28 12:06, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote: I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an

PC-BSD 9.0 in VirtualBox

2012-09-27 Thread Mike Jeays
I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected?