Re: rrdtool and perl 5.10 not playing nice

2010-07-13 Thread Rob Byrnes
On 13 July 2010 22:59, Rob Byrnes wrote: > I have seen this issue on two machines now, but this particular > instance is on a newly built one. > > I run munin to collect and graph stats on my network from this box. > net-mgmt/munin-master depends on perl and rrdtool. I installed p

rrdtool and perl 5.10 not playing nice

2010-07-13 Thread Rob Byrnes
I have seen this issue on two machines now, but this particular instance is on a newly built one. I run munin to collect and graph stats on my network from this box. net-mgmt/munin-master depends on perl and rrdtool. I installed perl 5.10 from ports and then installed munin-master. rrdtool was

Re: amavisd - exited on signal 11 - FreeBSD 8 with Perl 5.10

2010-05-20 Thread Hans F. Nordhaug
* Hans F. Nordhaug [2010-04-29]: > * Hans F. Nordhaug [2010-04-29]: > > Hi! > > > > I have been happily running Postfix with amavisd-new (and Clamav > > and SpamAssassin) on FreeBSD 7 with Perl 5.8 for a long time. > > Recently, I upgraded to FreeBSD 8 and rebuilt all ports (after > > updating

Re: amavisd - exited on signal 11 - FreeBSD 8 with Perl 5.10

2010-04-29 Thread Hans F. Nordhaug
ed and found that this could be related to do_ascii/UUlib > and disabled do_ascii in /usr/local/etc/amavisd.conf. That didn't fix > it. Then I read somewhere that this could be caused by problems with > nested regexp and that Perl 5.10 didn't have that problem. I upgraded > to P

amavisd - exited on signal 11 - FreeBSD 8 with Perl 5.10

2010-04-29 Thread Hans F. Nordhaug
/amavisd.conf. That didn't fix it. Then I read somewhere that this could be caused by problems with nested regexp and that Perl 5.10 didn't have that problem. I upgraded to Perl 5.10.1 (and rebuild all ports depending on it) and that also didn't fix it. Currently all my port are up-to-date.

Port of perl 5.10

2009-03-01 Thread Robert Huff
Valerio Daelli writes: > is there anyone working on a port of perl5.10? > I can only see ports of 5.8 and 5.6. > I can make a port of 5.10, it seems to compile flawlessly on > FreeBSD 7. _Many_ ports depend on perl, and each must be tested (and if broken hopefully fixed) before such

Port of perl 5.10

2009-03-01 Thread Valerio Daelli
Hi is there anyone working on a port of perl5.10? I can only see ports of 5.8 and 5.6. I can make a port of 5.10, it seems to compile flawlessly on FreeBSD 7. Have a good day Valerio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-27 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 03:27:19 Jerry wrote: > Since it does seem to work quite well under Linux, I was wondering > if there was some fundamental flaw in FBSD that prevented it from > working correctly here. Even so, failing to get a major project like > Perl running properly in over a year

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
Jerry wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:45:12 + Kris Kennaway wrote: [snip] It is still true that the change from 5.6 to 5.8 was very disruptive because it broke lots of things in the ports tree. Is this the official reason that Perl-5.10 has not been released into the ports tree? Are

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-26 Thread Robert Huff
Jerry writes: > Are ports being tied to specific versions of Perl? I did some > Googling and found that of the users that have installed Perl > from source on FBSD, most were not experiencing any major > problem. If every time Perl is updated it will require massive > changes or whatever to

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-26 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:45:12 + Kris Kennaway wrote: [snip] >It is still true that the change from 5.6 to 5.8 was very disruptive >because it broke lots of things in the ports tree. Is this the official reason that Perl-5.10 has not been released into the ports tree? Are ports bein

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
Bruce Cran wrote: On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:47:21 -0700 Tim Judd wrote: Jerry wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST) "Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum" wrote: Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8). [...] on the

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-25 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:47:21 -0700 Tim Judd wrote: > Jerry wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST) > > "Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum" wrote: > > > > > >> Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its > >> still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8). [...] > on

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-25 Thread Tim Judd
Jerry wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST) "Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum" wrote: Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8). Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably? Is there any sche

Re: Perl 5.10?

2008-12-23 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST) "Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum" wrote: >Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still >not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8). > >Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably? Is >there any schedule for when i

Perl 5.10?

2008-12-23 Thread Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8). Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably? Is there any schedule for when it will be added? This is a major release of a major language, not an obscure

perl 5.10 port

2008-05-28 Thread Nickolay D. Hodyunya
Hello. I'm interesting when perl 5.10 will be available in freebsd ports? Always Want to ask same question about qt4.4. -- Regards, Nickolay D. Hodyunya. mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs