Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-19 Thread Gary Affonso
First off, thanks to Kris and Mel for the previous definitive answers. Let me see if I can summarize this correctly... 1) It's important that administrators who are taking advantage of pre-compiled packages (like me) use packages that have been compiled for their particular base system. 2) F

Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-04 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 16:40:27 Dan Nelson wrote: > Also, packages from the -stable directory may have > different/conflicting dependencies compared to existing packages on > your system. Imagine installing 6.2 before the x.org-7 update, then > trying to "pkg_add -r" a package from the -sta

Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-04 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 04), Kris Kennaway said: > Gary Affonso wrote: >> I'm curious, why does "pkg_add -r" point to the "release" snapshot >> of ports by default? Is the idea that a "release" is well-tested >> and that any deviation from that (even security or bug-fix changes) >> is an unknown

Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
Gueven Bay wrote: I'm curious, why does "pkg_add -r" point to the "release" snapshot of ports by default? Is the idea that a "release" is well-tested and that any deviation from that (even security or bug-fix changes) is an unknown that new users need to be shielded against when grabbing package

Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-04 Thread Gueven Bay
> > I'm curious, why does "pkg_add -r" point to the "release" snapshot of > > ports by default? Is the idea that a "release" is well-tested and that > > any deviation from that (even security or bug-fix changes) is an unknown > > that new users need to be shielded against when grabbing packages wi

Re: Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
Gary Affonso wrote: If I do, it seems to me that the absolute first thing I should do after installing a release version would be to change where "pkg_add -r" is sourcing packages from. Either to "current" if I like to live on the edge or "stable" if I want to be a more conservative. No, "st

Philosophy of default "pkg_add -r" PACKAGESITE?

2007-09-03 Thread Gary Affonso
Here's one thing I've never quite understood about FreeBSD and I was hoping somebody could provide some enlightenment... I've got 6.2-release installed. By default (as you all probably know) "pkg_add -r" fetches packages from the "release" directory: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i3