32 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Sasa Stupar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>Song)
>
>
>LOL. Trying to dig ditches with ice cream sticks
>boys?
>
>--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
-
> >From: Sasa Stupar
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 12:00 AM
> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections?
> (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
> >Song)
> >
> >
> >
tested it. Doubtless
>> others are available on the Internet.
>>
>> Ted
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 A
Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation.
Sasa
--On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
what does the CPU of the rou
TED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
>Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>Song)
>
>
>Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation.
>
>Sasa
alf Of Sasa Stupar
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
--On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-Original Messa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM
>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
>>> Theme Song)
>>>
>>>
>>>
ct: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)
--On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROT
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
>Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
>Theme S
ubject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)
--On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM
To: Ted Mittelst
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:36 AM
>To: Sasa Stupar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>Song)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: F
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:42 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>Song)
>
>
>
&
er 2005 20:01 -0800 Ted
> Mittelstaedt
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Danial Thom
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December
sd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)
Ted
Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and without polling:
**
Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001
TCP window size
>-Original Message-
>From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: F
TECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
Well, if polling does no good for fxp, due to
the
hardware doing controlled interrupts, then why
does
th
ebsd.org
> >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections?
> (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
> >Song)
> >
>
> >> Well, if polling does no good for fxp, due
> to
> >> the
> >> hardware doing controlled interrupts, then
> why
> >> does
&g
reebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
Well, if polling does no good for fxp, due to
the
hardware doing controlled interrupts, then why
does
the fxp driver even let you set it as an
option?
And why have many people who have enabled
olling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
Well, if polling does no good for fxp, due to
the
hardware doing controlled interrupts, then why
does
the fxp driver even let you set it as an
option?
And why have many people who have enabled it on
fxp seen an improvement?
They h
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>Song)
>
I also use polling on my Intel Pro/100S and I get inscrease of almoast 100%
in speed. OK, My machine is Celeron 433 with 256 MB RAM and it is used as
router. With iperf between DMZ and LAN with polling enabled I reach speed
of 90 Mbit and without polling I can get speed only about 58 Mbit.
So f
:44
> AM:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>-Original Message-
> >> >>From: Drew Tomlinson
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:30 PM
> >> >>To: Ted Mittelsta
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:07 AM
>To: Drew Tomlinson
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:46 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson
>Cc: Michael Vince; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Kris Kennaway
>Subject: RE: Polling For
0 PM
>>>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>>>Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
>>>Kris Kennaway
>>>Subject: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
>Theme Song)
>>>
>>>
>>>On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM Ted Mit
--- Cezar Fistik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a remark. I'm using an "Intel PRO/1000 MT
> Dual Port Gigabit Copper
> CAT5 Server PCI express Adapter" in a box
> serving as router. Pumping 150Mbps
> through it with 99% idle CPU and 1% interrupts,
> polling enabled. It's
> a litle
> >>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> >>Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> >>Kris Kennaway
> >>Subject: Polling For 100 mbps Connections?
> (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song)
> >>
> >>
> >>On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM
L PROTECTED];
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> >Kris Kennaway
> >Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps Connections?
> (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
> >Song)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--- Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
Hello,
Just a remark. I'm using an "Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port Gigabit Copper
CAT5 Server PCI express Adapter" in a box serving as router. Pumping 150Mbps
through it with 99% idle CPU and 1% interrupts, polling enabled. It's
a litle bit expensive, but it does its job perfectly.
--
Best regards
mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song)
On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Michael,
Fundamentally, here's the problem Danial is claiming exists:
it takes a certain amount of time to get the packet clocked in
from the network into the ethernet receiver. Th
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:35 PM
>To: Drew Tomlinson; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
>Kris Kennaway
>Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps
>-Original Message-
>From: Drew Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:30 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
>Kris Kennaway
>Subject: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was R
--- Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> >Michael,
> >
> > Fundamentally, here's the problem Danial is
> claiming exists:
> >
> >it takes a certain amount of time to get the
> packet clocked in
> >from the network into the ethernet recei
On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Michael,
Fundamentally, here's the problem Danial is claiming exists:
it takes a certain amount of time to get the packet clocked in
from the network into the ethernet receiver. This is hardware
dependent and cannot be changed.
It takes a certai
35 matches
Mail list logo