On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:04:47PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2003 07:43 pm, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> >
> > If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't
> > much difference. I offten use the make method in this case. But I
> > switch to portinstall a
On Saturday 27 September 2003 07:43 pm, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
>
> If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't
> much difference. I offten use the make method in this case. But I
> switch to portinstall and portupgrade if I a) have updated /usr/ports
> and b) have installed an
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 04:59:50PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote:
> Is there any benefit to using the standard 'make' method of installing
> ports over the 'portinstall' command (or portupgrade -N), or
> vice-versa?
If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't much
difference. I
Is there any benefit to using the standard 'make' method of installing
ports over the 'portinstall' command (or portupgrade -N), or
vice-versa?
--
Todd Stephens
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly,
while bad people will find a way around the laws." - Plato
