Re: Ports with modern compilers

2012-01-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
tification: Delivery has failed > > This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: > > Message-id: <467d6fa8-f0fa-45b3-b367-20fe9ad64...@mac.com> > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:07:05 -0800 > From: Chuck Swiger > To: Dmitry Sarkisov >

Re: Ports with modern compilers

2012-01-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 12, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Dmitry Sarkisov wrote: > Hello list, > > I'd like to try building my ports with features and optimizations modern > complers provide. > A couple of q. here: > > 1. What's the safest (less painful) way to go - build with fresh gcc or > clang/llvm? For portable code,

Ports with modern compilers

2012-01-12 Thread Dmitry Sarkisov
Hello list, I'd like to try building my ports with features and optimizations modern complers provide. A couple of q. here: 1. What's the safest (less painful) way to go - build with fresh gcc or clang/llvm? 2. Is it ok to build new ports with new compiler, while already having a bunch of them