Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-08 Thread Ivailo Tanusheff
(Bulgaria) AD Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 08.07.2009 04:09 To b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc Subject Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-08 Thread Michael Powell
b. f. wrote: But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be. I've [snip] also noticed a few times it seemed like it was upgrading the same version(s) over again. I just chalked this up to the ports system

Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Eric Sheesley
I've been running Freebsd for several years on one of my primary public facing servers. Currently the server is running Freebsd 7.2. Up until about 2 weeks ago portupgrade always seemed to upgrade ports in the correct order so that any dependencies were built first, allowing all ports to be

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread b. f.
For the past 2 weeks though I have to run portupgrade 2-3 times every time I have more than one update because at least 1 port fails due to a dependency(which is seemingly upgraded after it tries to upgrade the other port). What the heck is going on and how do I fix it? We obviously can't help

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Eric Sheesley
Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones) that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today: === Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1 === Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1 --- Cleaning out obsolete shared libraries [Updating the pkgdb

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread b. f.
On 7/8/09, Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com wrote: Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones) that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today: === Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1 === Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1 ---

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Eric Sheesley
Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I was aware it wouldn't update that(no port for this perl module yet anyway). If you notice, it doesn't proceed to install ffmpeg, i force it to(highlighted by ): ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Prokofyev Vladislav
2009/7/8 Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones) that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today: === Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1 === Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1 ---

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread b. f.
On 7/8/09, Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com wrote: Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I was aware it wouldn't update that(no port for this perl module yet anyway). If you notice, it doesn't proceed to install ffmpeg, i force it to(highlighted by ): Yes, I

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread Michael Powell
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: snip] As seen above, libtheora built and installed just fine, but ffmpeg was skipped for some reason. I ran portupgrade -a again and all worked fine. This ways also occuring when I ran portupgrade -arR. Ports tree is updated with cvsup each night. I don't

Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies

2009-07-07 Thread b. f.
But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be. I've portsdb -Fu runs `make fetchindex`, grabbing the INDEX* file from whatever server you've told it to go to, and then rebuilds/updates the portsdb from that.