Re: Portupgrade vs. multiple versions of packages

2003-01-02 Thread Scott Mitchell
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote: That upgrade is a doozie. Been there, done that! rm -fr qt2 is (I think) the correct thing to do (someone else on the list will correct me). Then port kde3. qt2 and qt3 will NOT live comfortably together. So delete qt2 and

Re: Portupgrade vs. multiple versions of packages

2003-01-01 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote: Scott Mitchell wrote: Hi all, I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably,

Portupgrade vs. multiple versions of packages

2002-12-31 Thread Scott Mitchell
Hi all, I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for (unsurprisingly) the KDE2 -- KDE3 upgrade. Portupgrade simply refused to upgrade

Re: Portupgrade vs. multiple versions of packages

2002-12-31 Thread Kent Stewart
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 07:41 am, Scott Mitchell wrote: Hi all, I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for (unsurprisingly)

Re: Portupgrade vs. multiple versions of packages

2002-12-31 Thread paul beard
Brian Astill wrote: Scott Mitchell wrote: Hi all, I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for (unsurprisingly) the KDE2 -- KDE3