On Saturday 19 December 2009 22:26, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> Don't spread FUD please. If you had read the WIKI you would know it talks
> about sysinstall support for ZFS, not about removing UFS.
i'm sorry if my mail was misleading. we have no idea how it will be
implemented. my guess is that both
On Saturday 19 December 2009 19:49:17 Reko Turja wrote:
> > under Other Kernel:
> > ZFS as default
>
> So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother
> with FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE?
Don't spread FUD please. If you had read the WIKI you would know it talks
about sysi
Reko Turja wrote:
under Other Kernel:
ZFS as default
So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother with
FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE?
Since when does changing the default action imply making the previous
default impossible or even difficult? And since when does ad
under Other Kernel:
ZFS as default
So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother
with FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-question
-Original Message-
From: Victor Lyapunov
Sent: 19 December 2009 14:42
To: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: Any chance ZFS becoming default?
Hi everybody,
Sorry for asking dumb questions, but is there any chance zfs becoming
default FS in FreeBSD? If so, how soon might this happen?
Cheers,
On Saturday 19 December 2009 16:42, Victor Lyapunov wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> Sorry for asking dumb questions, but is there any chance zfs becoming
> default FS in FreeBSD? If so, how soon might this happen?
>
> Cheers,
> Victor.
As seen in
http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD9
under Other Kernel:
ZFS
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:42:27 +0600
Victor Lyapunov replied:
>Hi everybody,
>Sorry for asking dumb questions, but is there any chance zfs becoming
>default FS in FreeBSD? If so, how soon might this happen?
It appears that everyone is not as enthusiastic about it.
http://www.neowin.net/news/main/
