Re: NAT trouble

2004-08-08 Thread Björn Lindström
"JJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A new rewrite of the FreeBSD handbook firewall section is currently > being made ready for update to the handbook. You can get an > in-process copy from www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/ > > For more help post complete contents of your rc.conf, ppp.conf, ipfw

RE: NAT trouble

2004-07-21 Thread JJB
Add this statement to your ppp.conf file enable dns -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cleyton Agapito Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:09 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NAT trouble Hi friends, I using nat in my home dial

Re: NAT trouble

2004-07-21 Thread Cleyton Agapito
Hi friends, I using nat in my home dial connection. The route is fine but my machine is responding that the network is unrecheable for names, and if I put the DNS adresses in resolv.conf it works. I did some like that a time ago in a linux suite (that is getting the same problem after a upgrad

RE: NAT trouble

2004-07-19 Thread JJB
Change natd_interface="tun0" to natd_interface="rl0" Change 00050 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any via tun0 to 00050 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any via rl0 redirect rl0 tcp 192.168.0.2:15000 15000 A new rewrite of the FreeBSD handbook firewall section is currently being ma

Re: NAT trouble

2004-07-19 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Björn Lindström) wrote: > Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> (Where tun0 is the interface of my ADSL connection.) > > > > Is tun0 the real interface? > > No, the actual card is rl0: > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:feb0:5d5b%rl0 prefixlen

Re: NAT trouble

2004-07-18 Thread Björn Lindström
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (Where tun0 is the interface of my ADSL connection.) > > Is tun0 the real interface? No, the actual card is rl0: rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::2e0:4cff:feb0:5d5b%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:e0:4c:b0:5d:5b media:

Re: NAT trouble

2004-07-18 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Björn Lindström) wrote: > I'm having some trouble to get NAT working on the Internet gateway of my > home LAN. > > Here's my setup: > > I have compiled a kernel with the following options added: > > options IPFIREWALL > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_L