or having to make the apps manually.
I am sorry if I stepped on any toes .. I dont mean to stir up any trouble ..
Just an outside observer trying to get started with freebsd.
From: Scott W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rotten rottie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Questions about
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 11:52, rotten rottie wrote:
I know this is probably a touchy subject but..
... the ports tree isn't versioned, it's the equivalent of current
Wouldnt it be logical to have current/stable versions of the ports tree ?
Then when you install a base system from cd it
to update it...
In other word how would I go about upgrading /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd
or named or nfs or anything that is installed in the base install without
rebooting ?
From: Scott W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rotten rottie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Questions
rotten rottie wrote:
I am a linux user that wants to switch to freebsd... I am a bit confused
about applying updates etc..
I installed a box for trial it was 5.1, I wanted to see if I could use
ports to update openssh for a test examp. After the port installed I
noticed
that another version of
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 17:39,
rotten rottie [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent a missive stating:
1) if there are two trees(lack of better words) why would ssh exist in
both
the system tree and the ports tree ? Wouldnt it be better to have it in
the
ports tree ?
Ports are not installed by
From: rotten rottie
I installed a box for trial it was 5.1, I wanted to see if I could use
ports
to update openssh for a test examp. After the port installed I noticed
that
another version of openssh was installed on the system. I
Bad test example. As with named, sendmail and a few others
rotten rottie wrote:
I am a linux user that wants to switch to freebsd... I am a bit confused
about applying updates etc..
I installed a box for trial it was 5.1, I wanted to see if I could use
ports
to update openssh for a test examp. After the port installed I noticed
that
another version of
