On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when
building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
Konrad Heuer
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when
building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105
shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077