> Do community member find these additional features worth the cost?
No.
We just want to get our patches without jumping through any hoops, or
worrying about if the check made it through the mail, or if Sun FUBAR'ed
our support account info rather than there being a problem with the
Update Manag
At 09:32 PM 11/15/2005, Victor Watkins wrote:
> Do community member find these additional features worth the cost?
No.
We just want to get our patches without jumping through any hoops, or
worrying about if the check made it through the mail, or if Sun FUBAR'ed
our support account info rather
At 18:46 Tue 15 Nov 2005, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> I still run 1 solaris machine and thats a sparc running 9.0 ...as
> soon as the machine dies or the OS is no longer supported, the
> machine will find a nice resting spot in some city dump (or recycler)
>
Not to start a holy war or anything, but
At 11:29 AM 11/16/2005, Lee Capps wrote:
At 18:46 Tue 15 Nov 2005, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> I still run 1 solaris machine and thats a sparc running 9.0 ...as
> soon as the machine dies or the OS is no longer supported, the
> machine will find a nice resting spot in some city dump (or recycler)
>
N
gt;Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:33 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Solaris patches and Solaris Express
>
>
>
>> Do community member find these additional features worth the cost?
>
>No.
>
>We just want to get our p
At 03:52 AM 11/17/2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hmmm,
We run a lot of Solaris 8 and FreeBSD. I find Solaris 8 pretty
much the same speed as FreeBSD for what we do. However, one thing
is that we do not run X-windows on either our Solaris 8 or FreeBSD
systems, because they are servers and the
On Nov 17, 2005, at 5:00 AM, J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 03:52 AM 11/17/2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hmmm,
We run a lot of Solaris 8 and FreeBSD. I find Solaris 8 pretty
much the same speed as FreeBSD for what we do. However, one thing
is that we do not run X-windows on either our Solaris 8
>-Original Message-
>From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:00 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Victor Watkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Solaris patches and Solaris Express
>
>
>
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:00 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Victor Watkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Solaris patches and Solaris
On Nov 19, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Indeed. But this is not Solaris 10 - thats when all of this changed.
I never understood why anyone would go to Solaris 10 unless they had a
64 bit processor and compiled all their apps under a 64 bit compiler.
Sun
didn't either, which is w
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of P.U.Kruppa
>Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:13 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Victor Watkins; FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; J.D. Bronson
>Subject: RE: Sol
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad
>Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
>Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 7:01 AM
>To: Free BSD Questions list
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Solaris patches and Solaris Express
>
&g
On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Indeed. But this is not Solaris 10 - thats when all of this
changed.
I never understood why anyone would go to Solaris 10 unless they
had a
64 bit processor and compiled all their
>-Original Message-
>From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:56 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Free BSD Questions list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Solaris patches and Solaris Express
>
>
>
>On
14 matches
Mail list logo
