Benjamin Keating wrote:
Either way, I'll be using / populating that thing with as much quality
info as I can. Thanks! Are you in charge of this?
No, you should talk to the Jimbo guy (Jimbo is a FreeBSD enthusiast /
professional / zealot, depending on who you ask, and is the maintainer
of this
This is great! I'd love to contribute my mediawiki template and
graphic design knowledge to spice it up a bit if you're interested.
Either way, I'll be using / populating that thing with as much quality
info as I can. Thanks! Are you in charge of this?
- bpk
On 5/4/05, Karel Miklav [EMAIL
Benjamin Keating ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 10:00]:
Is there anything being done to help keep the handbook just a little
more updated? It's a great handbook, if it's content wasn't so out of
date.
A wiki would be a great way to acheive this. If there isn't a project
like it yet, I'd like to
Karel Miklav ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 21:19]:
Benjamin Keating wrote:
A wiki would be a great way to acheive this. If there isn't a project
like it yet, I'd like to propose we set one up. I can contribute quite
a bit of time and resources towards this. Save me wiki.freebsd.org and
On 2005-05-03 17:29, Benjamin Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:00:06PM -0700, Benjamin Keating wrote:
Is there anything being done to help keep the handbook just a little
more updated? It's a great handbook, if it's
Benjamin Keating wrote:
Is there anything being done to help keep the handbook just a little
more updated? It's a great handbook, if it's content wasn't so out of
date.
A wiki would be a great way to acheive this. If there isn't a project
like it yet, I'd like to propose we set one up. I
On May 4, 2005, at 2:30 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-05-03 17:29, Benjamin Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things like that bring noise to this mailing list.
It's ok. This is part of the purpose of having the list :)
You wouldn't think so from the flak some people have received for not
Benjamin Keating wrote:
Is there anything being done to help keep the handbook just a little
more updated? It's a great handbook, if it's content wasn't so out of
date.
A wiki would be a great way to acheive this. If there isn't a project
like it yet, I'd like
I would love to see a wiki for FreeBSD. I think that it would be
really beneficial for the project. It would take some work to
establish it but if there were enough participants, it could turn into
a very robust documentation project. Some hard work would be required
to make the wiki healthy and
On 5/3/2005 at 5:29 PM Benjamin Keating wrote:
|A wiki would eliminate that bottle neck (PR).
|Some parts are out of date. Others fail to mention FAQ , etc. that
|could really help. For instance, the NAT/DHCP articles could easily
|include a 'typical home user' HOWTO rather then tricking the user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan J. Cavicchioni wrote:
I would love to see a wiki for FreeBSD. I think that it would be
really beneficial for the project. It would take some work to
establish it but if there were enough participants, it could turn
into a very robust
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:54:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A compromise approach could be to do what www.php.net does. On this site
they have the official manual, which has the same flaws as the FBSD handbook
(out of date pages, obtuse descriptions, ...). In addition, postings from
On Wed, 04 May 2005 09:12:09 -0400
MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/2005 at 5:29 PM Benjamin Keating wrote:
|A wiki would eliminate that bottle neck (PR).
|Some parts are out of date. Others fail to mention FAQ , etc. that
|could really help. For instance, the NAT/DHCP articles could
MikeM wrote:
On 5/3/2005 at 5:29 PM Benjamin Keating wrote:
|A wiki would eliminate that bottle neck (PR). |Some parts are out
of date. Others fail to mention FAQ , etc. that |could really help.
For instance, the NAT/DHCP articles could easily |include a
'typical home user' HOWTO rather
Trevor Sullivan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
know it's off-topic, but I thought it might surprise some folks, and
it's possible it could prove important to some, I guess. Notice the
words above, about him using the sha-1 hash. You realize it's been
broken? The crypto
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:00:06PM -0700, Benjamin Keating wrote:
Is there anything being done to help keep the handbook just a little
more updated? It's a great handbook, if it's content wasn't so out of
date.
What is out of date?
Generally, if you want to improve something in the handbook,
A wiki would eliminate that bottle neck (PR).
Some parts are out of date. Others fail to mention FAQ , etc. that
could really help. For instance, the NAT/DHCP articles could easily
include a 'typical home user' HOWTO rather then tricking the user into
reading that one line where it says you have
: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Handbook, in Wiki form.
A wiki would eliminate that bottle neck (PR).
Some parts are out of date. Others fail to mention FAQ , etc. that
could really help. For instance, the NAT/DHCP articles could easily
include a 'typical home user' HOWTO rather
18 matches
Mail list logo
