Well over 20 years experience with FreeBSD, and I was not aware of "Project
Evil" ;)
I don't know if my olicom card has NDIS versions of their driver for token
ring, but if so, that just might work! Still, getting the deprecated oltr
driver on FreeBSD9 would be awesome
Jay West
EZwind.net
PO
On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Jay West wrote:
> Well over 20 years experience with FreeBSD, and I was not aware of "Project
> Evil" ;)
>
> I don't know if my olicom card has NDIS versions of their driver for token
> ring, but if so, that just might work! Still, getting the deprecated oltr
> driver
est
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Token Ring (really)
On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Jay West wrote:
> Well over 20 years experience with FreeBSD, and I was not aware of
> "Project Evil" ;)
>
> I don't know if my olicom card has NDIS versions of their drive
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Jay West wrote:
> Well, found the XP drivers for the card (it's a Madge Smart MK4 PCI
> adapter,
> not olicom as I thought).
>
> Ndisgen seemed to work fine
>
> After kldloading the resulting module, ifconfig shows:
> ndis0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>et
Adam wrote...
Otherwise, it's time to abandon steamships for airplanes. Sounds like you
have a primed business opportunity just waiting to be exploited.
---
Actually, this is for a historical re-creation project. Airplanes would be
entirely inappropriate for a historical display, so stea
On 4/8/2012 4:41 PM, Jay West wrote:
Adam wrote...
Otherwise, it's time to abandon steamships for airplanes. Sounds like you
have a primed business opportunity just waiting to be exploited.
---
Actually, this is for a historical re-creation project. Airplanes would be
entirely inapprop
"Jay West" wrote:
> this is for a historical re-creation project ...
>
> I guess I'll have to see how tough it would be to yank
> the TR code from 7x and get it running under 9x.
Might it not be both more historically accurate, and a great deal
easier, to just use the version of FreeBSD that cor
per...@pluto.rain.com writes:
> Might it not be both more historically accurate, and a great deal
> easier, to just use the version of FreeBSD that corresponds to
> the historical era being re-created?
And skip feature, performance, and security improvements made
since?
From: Nikos Vassiliadis
To: Jay West
Cc: 'Adam Vande More' ; 'mikel king'
; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Token Ring (really)
On 4/8/2012 4:41 PM, Jay West wrote:
> Adam wrote...
&
sday, April 11, 2012 9:33 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Token Ring (really)
From: Nikos Vassiliadis
To: Jay West
Cc: 'Adam Vande More' ; 'mikel king'
; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 7:03 PM
S
It was written
---
> Might it not be both more historically accurate, and a great deal
> easier, to just use the version of FreeBSD that corresponds to the
> historical era being re-created?
And skip feature, performance, and security improvements made since?
-
On 04/09/12 23:42, Jay West wrote:
It was written
---
Might it not be both more historically accurate, and a great deal
easier, to just use the version of FreeBSD that corresponds to the
historical era being re-created?
And skip feature, performance, and security
12 matches
Mail list logo
