RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-11 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Risdon Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:32 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Colin J. Raven; FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. Surely the easiest way to deal

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-10 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:17 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: Use IMP. [...] Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-09 Thread Tabor Kelly
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: snip Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in I.E., so the end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to include it in their browsers as if you just make your own certs. Not quite. If they include the CA-Cert root certificate, they only have

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-09 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tabor Kelly Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:39 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Colin J. Raven; Peter Risdon; FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: snip

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-08 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 7 at 23:53, Tabor Kelly launched this into the bitstream: Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: snip 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a self-signed key (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that say use make key or whatnot don't work) I am not

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-08 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: Tabor Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:54 PM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Peter Risdon; Colin J. Raven; FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: snip 5) many issues

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: Peter Risdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:17 AM To: Colin J. Raven Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 7 at 09

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Tabor Kelly
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: snip 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a self-signed key (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that say use make key or whatnot don't work) I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you have a very powerful front end mail

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Jorn Argelo
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:41:50 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you have a very powerful front end mail system.

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth the effort, as if you install the

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream: On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream: On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: Use IMP. [...] Now you mention

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Gregor Mosheh
Three companies I know of use Squirrel: my work, my friend's colo, and the last ISP where I worked. They're all very fond of it, as am I. It does require IMAP, but so does IMP. At my friend's colo he also tried IMP but decided against it because installation was more complicated than Squirrel. I

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread whitevamp
i use openwebmail i found it easer to setup then squarlmail - Original Message - From: Rene C. Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. I'm in the process of looking

Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Tabor Kelly
Rene C. Mendoza wrote: I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't know what to choose. thanks, Rene I used IMP a few years

RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you have a very powerful front end mail system. IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last