On 3/24/07, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address? in the
same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
As others have posted, not without either doing IP address
manipulation or using the patches avail
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address?
in the same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
IMHO not.
Not entirely true apparently. see http://blog.cg.nu/?p=9 for details of
someone who adapted PJD's patch for current to
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address? in the
same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
IMHO not.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: Jonathan Horne
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: another jail question
>
> J
Jonathan Horne wrote:
> is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address?
> in the same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd
> host?
jail(8) only allows you one IP -- there are some patches around
which will let you create jails with more IPs, and even better
th
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:47:10PM -0400, "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hardly any traffic... it's an internal dev machine hit by about 10
> > people...
>
> 101 Jails:
>
> last pid: 13467; load averages: 21.09, 13.50, 19.54up 17+12:23:50 13:43:55
> 1576 processes:4 runn
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Any idea when it will be merged into the main code base ?
> i tend to stay away from development branches..
not sure, I believe not until 2.2 is fully released ... since I'm one of
the ones that pushed for it to happen, I kinda had to be one of those
wi
4, 2002 2:43 PM
> To: Jeff MacDonald
> Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > wow, the sieve filtering really turns me on [yuck i know].
> >
> > currently with qmail/vpop
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> > > > server is a dual PII 300 with 512 megs of ram, this should be fine
> > > > to handle 2 jails, right ?
> > >
> > > unless you start gettinjg into high memory circumstances (ie.
> > > jakarta-tomcat is a major dog for memory), 2 wouldn't be a probl
>
> jeff.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
> > To: Jeff MacDonald
> > Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
> >
> > > server is a dual PII 300 with 512 megs of ram, this should be fine
> > > to handle 2 jails, right ?
> >
> > unless you start gettinjg into high memory circumstances (ie.
> > jakarta-tomcat is a major dog for memory), 2 wouldn't be a problem ...
Just for comparison...
I'm running four jails
it a matter of know what direcotires
to make.. etc ?
jeff.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Jeff MacDonald
> Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Another Jail Quest
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> I run qmail, cause combined with vpopmail, it kicks ass for virtual
> domains.
Postfix with CyrusIMAPd v2.2, cause, well, Cyrus IMAPd is just in a class
all its own :)
Note that CyrusIMAPd was extended several months back to do full virtual
domain unde
> Note that the 'security risk' is more based on the trust level you have
> for your users ... if its just you, or you and a few friends, you
> shouldn't have an issue with it ... the one issue you will have with
> shared memory and jails is that I *believe* that Apache2 requires shared
> memory to
12:15 PM
> To: Jeff MacDonald
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
> > Yeah, i think i'll go the safe route and keep away from shared memory as
> > such will likly run it on the host.
>
&
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Yeah, i think i'll go the safe route and keep away from shared memory as
> such will likly run it on the host.
not sure what your sparc is, but you might look at putting postgresql over
there, which might allow you to create a larger cache buffer ... at
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> > You can run PostgreSQL in a jail - though you do need to turn the
> > jail.sysvipc_allowed sysctl on first. You can also run it in the host
> > environment and talk via TCP if you wish.
>
> some folks have said this is a security risk, as the shared me
> Jeff, check with Chris on this, as I believe he's actually running a game
> server inside of one of his jails, with his machine running off of the one
> IP ... in fact, and I may be wrong about this, but you *should* be able to
> avoid the other machine altogether and use IPFW for this, as I *bel
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Dan Pelleg
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:08 AM
> To: Jeff MacDonald
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Another Jail Question
>
>
> "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes. Or you could just run both jails on the same IP address.
yeah, a few people have said this but i have a spare sparc laying around
to do natd avec openbsd, so i may as well put it to good use ;)
> You can run PostgreSQL in a jail - though you do need to turn the
> jail.sysvipc_allowed sysct
"Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
> one for "work sensitive" data, the other for personal fun stuff.
>
> However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
>
> Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put i
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
> one for "work sensitive" data, the other for personal fun stuff.
>
> However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
>
> Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behi
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
> one for "work sensitive" data, the other for personal fun stuff.
>
> However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
>
> Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behi
At 2002-12-04T14:27:33Z, "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind a natd
> box so it has 2 ip's [192.168.0.1 and .2] and just make the nat box,
> forward packets to teh appropriate jail based upon what port they come in
> on
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:27:33AM -0500, Jeff MacDonald typed:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
> one for "work sensitive" data, the other for personal fun stuff.
>
> However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
>
> Could i take the server taht will have
25 matches
Mail list logo