RE: arplookup messages? now what have I done?

2003-02-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
mailing list said: > > Hmmm, I'm confused > >> If you want to have your aliases attached to the tl0 >> interface, you need to use addresses in that range. So, >> something like: >> >> ifconfig_tl0_alias3="inet XXX.82.15.210 netmask 0x" > > That's what I have, and I'm getting those funny a

RE: arplookup messages? now what have I done?

2003-02-06 Thread Phillip Smith (mailing list)
Hmmm, I'm confused > If you want to have your aliases attached to the tl0 > interface, you need to use addresses in that range. So, > something like: > > ifconfig_tl0_alias3="inet XXX.82.15.210 netmask 0x" That's what I have, and I'm getting those funny arplookup error messages. > T

RE: arplookup messages? now what have I done?

2003-02-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
mailing list\ said: > > Hi Michael, > > My network topology skills are limited... does this mean the following: > > - my default gateway is on a 255.255.255.240 subnet > - so is my devices real address > - there is another device listed there (de0), no problems (internal) > > So, if I change the a

RE: arplookup messages? now what have I done?

2003-02-06 Thread Phillip Smith (mailing list)
M > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: arplookup messages? now what have I done? > > > > mailing list said: > > > > I recently added some aliases to my ipconfig and now I'm > getting these > > system messages? Should I be c

Re: arplookup messages? now what have I done?

2003-02-06 Thread Michael K. Smith
mailing list said: > > I recently added some aliases to my ipconfig and now I'm getting these > system messages? Should I be concerned? (FreeBSD 4.6) > > > ifconfig_de0="inet XXX.168.0.219 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_tl0="inet XXX.82.15.219 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_tl0_alias3=