Re: kde3 maintainer contact

Istvan Gabor writes: > I have a few specific questions regarding kde3 in freebsd. > As there is no freebsd kde3 list I would like to ask my questions > directly from port maintainer(s). Do you know how can I contact > them? There isn't one. There is a k...@freebsd.org mailing list, but it's list

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:50:00 Michiel Overtoom wrote: > I never understood the need for transparent windows. If you're working in > a window you want to concentrate on its contents, not on stuff that's > happening beneath it. It breaks the flow. I think it's indicative of the > ritalin-g

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On August 26, 2009 06:50:00 am Michiel Overtoom wrote: > On Friday 07 August 2009 16:12:03 Andrew Gould wrote: > > Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in > > resource consumption? > > As I see it, KDE4 fell in the Vista trap. I tried KDE4 and was showered > with eye c

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Friday 07 August 2009 16:12:03 Andrew Gould wrote: > Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in > resource consumption? As I see it, KDE4 fell in the Vista trap. I tried KDE4 and was showered with eye candy effects, some of which couldn't even be disabled. Also, quit

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:23:20PM +0100, RW wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700 > Gary Kline wrote: > > i'd be interested in Paul's question. it may be that kde3 > > is sopping up wy to much disc space. only have 6.5g > > left > > KDE4 makes KDE3 look like Fluxb

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thursday 06 August 2009 19:26:20 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On August 6, 2009 9:29:30 PM -0500 Mel Flynn > > wrote: > > On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go > >> about it? Do I need to completely unin

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

--On Friday, August 07, 2009 00:27:00 -0500 Kent Stewart wrote: On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:53:05 pm Paul Schmehl wrote: --On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl > > wrote: >> Can someone who has already done this upgrade sug

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

Le Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:53:05 -0500, Paul Schmehl a écrit : > I don't want to run KDE3 and KDE4 side by side. I want to migrate > from the former to the latter. K3B needs kde3 and amarok2 is not yet ready for KDE 4.3. I still use amarok 1.4. There is no problem to use kde3 and kde4. ___

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:12:03 -0500 Andrew Gould wrote: > Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in > resource consumption? (Please forgive me - I know that's a horribly > subjective question.) IMO it's less usable in terms of ergonomics, and they are still talking abou

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:53:05 -0500 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould > wrote: > > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own > > directory folder. This may imply that KDE3 and KDE4 can coexist. > > > > As always, YMMV. > > I was looking

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:23 AM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700 > Gary Kline wrote: > >        i'd be interested in Paul's question.  it may be that kde3 >>       is sopping up wy to much disc space.  only have 6.5g >>       left > > KDE4 makes  KDE3 look like Fluxbox. > > I

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700 Gary Kline wrote: i'd be interested in Paul's question. it may be that kde3 > is sopping up wy to much disc space. only have 6.5g > left KDE4 makes KDE3 look like Fluxbox. I can't remember the exact figures on /usr, but I mainta

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500 Andrew Gould wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul > Schmehl wrote: > > Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way > > to go about it?  Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first?  Is > > there an upgrade path that's not fraught

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 22:49:09 PDT Gary Kline wrote: On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:37:26AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould wrote: > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory > folder. Terminology: the directory (is not a folde

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:37:26AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould > wrote: > > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory > > folder. > > Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder). > FreeBSD h

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thursday 06 August 2009 05:53:05 pm Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould > > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl > > > > wrote: > >> Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go > >> about it?  Do I need to compl

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

--On August 6, 2009 9:29:30 PM -0500 Mel Flynn wrote: On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote: Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an upgrade path that's not fraught with go

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould > wrote: >> Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory >> folder. > > Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder). > FreeBSD has directories

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thursday 06 August 2009 15:21:14 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go > about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an > upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas? Wait a week I'd say. KDE 4.3.0 has hit the port

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

--On August 6, 2009 7:15:18 PM -0500 Andrew Gould wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go about it?  Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first?  Is there an upgrade path that's not fraught with got

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould wrote: > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory > folder. Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder). FreeBSD has directories, not folders. :-) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, German

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go > about it? Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first? Is there an > upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas? > i have a "me-too" here. i d

Re: KDE3 --> KDE4

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Can someone who has already done this upgrade suggest the best way to go > about it?  Do I need to completely uninstall kde3 first?  Is there an > upgrade path that's not fraught with gotchas? > > -- > Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst > Unl

Re: kde3 build problems

On Wednesday 10 September 2008 06:55:18 joeb wrote: > I believe kde3 is obsolete. I Just did kde4 and it worked. > That's most definitely not the case. KDE4 is still for early adopters, and KDE3 will continue to be supported as the ``conservative'' stable version for a while, according to

RE: kde3 build problems

I believe kde3 is obsolete. I Just did kde4 and it worked. pkg_add -r kde4 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Desmond Chapman Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:24 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: kde3 build problems Curren

Re: KDE3 Error

have tried the "make fetch" and no Error it was succesful. But after the "make fetch" i go to the directory cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3/make install the installation still not successful, here it is the error: Stop in /usr/ports/audio/nas. Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x1

Re: KDE3 Error

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:09:42PM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote: > Hi, > Why is it when i install KDE3 in my server I always got an error, this is > the command when i install it > > -cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3 > -make install > > *and this is the reply of the server:* > -Attempting to fetch from > ftp

Re: kde3 Make Install failure - SOLVED

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Hetzel > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 4:35 PM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: kde3 Make Install

Re: kde3 Make Install failure

On 8/22/06, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- It is http.test that appear to fail The failure begins with: http.test http-3.3 http::geturl FAILED Contents of test case: set token [hrrp::geturl $url] http:: data $token Test generated error; return code was: 1 Retur

Re: kde3 Make Install failure

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:36:30AM -0700, Vizion wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Brooks Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:20 AM > > To: Vizion > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Su

Re: kde3 Make Install failure

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:36:30AM -0700, Vizion wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Brooks Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:20 AM > > To: Vizion > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Su

Re: kde3 Make Install failure

> -Original Message- > From: Brooks Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:20 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: kde3 Make Install failure > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:

Re: kde3 Make Install failure

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:00:35AM -0700, Vizion wrote: > Trying to compile and install kde3 > on amd64 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0. kde3 fails a test and then hangs. > > cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3 > > Make runs fine but then: > > # Make Install > > terminates and hangs with following consol message: >

Re: KDE3 install problem n solution (BUG ????)

At 03:56 AM 1/18/2006, Mike Hernandez wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:04:10AM +0600, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote: > Installing & compiling KDE3 in 4.7 had problem in line 275 of > /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/work/kdebase-3.4.3/kcontrol/usbview/usbdevices.cpp > Not ready for 3.5 yet are you?

Re: KDE3 install problem n solution (BUG ????)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:04:10AM +0600, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote: > Installing & compiling KDE3 in 4.7 had problem in line 275 of > > /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/work/kdebase-3.4.3/kcontrol/usbview/usbdevices.cpp > Not ready for 3.5 yet are you? Mike

RE: kde3

This seems to be a bug. the distfile listed does not seem to exist. I found the source as a tgz, turned it into a bz2 and amended the distinfo accordingly. this worked, but I would imagine a patch will be issued soon. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-fr

Re: KDE3

On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Dru wrote: > > > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > > > > > > Can't blame it on an old dependency anymore, since I uninstalled pretty > > > near everything. Any suggestions anyone? > > > > The packages are built for 5.2. > > > > Kris > > > > Thanks. (

Re: KDE3

Your random fortune: Schnuffel, n.: A dog's practice of continuously nuzzling in your crotch in mixed company. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:03:06PM -0500, Dru wrote: > > > > Okay, who can help an unhappy c

Re: KDE3

On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:03:06PM -0500, Dru wrote: > > Okay, who can help an unhappy camper with their KDE3 on 5-1 Release? > > After 2 days of unsuccessful portupgrading from KDE2 to KDE3, I decided to > go the packages route. About that time, I discovered the upgrade FAQ for > FreeBSD/KDE whi

Re: kde3 meta port question

On Monday 02 February 2004 22:23, Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hi, > > I've kde installed from the cd on my box. > > I would like to recompile the "entire" kde packages. > > I'll do the following from /usr/ports/x11/kde3 > > @work:/usr/ports/x11/kde3# make > ===> Extracting for kde-3.1.4 > ===> Patchin

Re: kde3 meta port question

Didier Wiroth wrote: Hi, I would like to recompile the "entire" kde packages. I'll do the following from /usr/ports/x11/kde3 @work:/usr/ports/x11/kde3# make ... @work:/usr/ports/x11/kde3# That's it, it doesn't start to compile, why? Do I have to uninstall all my kde packages before being

Re: kde3 install

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Brian Henning wrote: > Subject: kde3 install > > Can someone explain to me what Qt is for here and why it has to be threaded? > thanks, > > Brian > > checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.1 (20021021)) (library qt-mt) > not found. Please check your installation! >

Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package

Hi! > I developed KDE on a P2/300 for quite some time. Run speed was fine, but > compiling KDE is a little painful on this speed of machine -- but that's only > really an issue if you are trying to run the latest HEAD development version > of KDE. Well, here's my "contest entry": I *built* KDE

Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Peter wrote: > Hello, > I have a 300mhz, 128MB Ram pc standing here, and I'm thinking of > installing kde3 on there, does anyone know if that will be an > alright combination or would that be very slow / not worth it? > I have an ath

Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:54, Willie Viljoen wrote: > I disagree. I run KDE 3.1 with all of the bells and wistles turned on on a > Celeron 333, performance compares favourably to Windows XP running on a > coworker's Duron 1300. All I would d

Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package

On Saturday 08 February 2003 08:01, André Ramos wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 05:54, Peter wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a 300mhz, 128MB Ram pc standing here, and I'm thinking of > > installing kde3 on there, does anyone know if that will be an alright > > combination or would that be very slow

Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package

On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 05:54, Peter wrote: > Hello, > I have a 300mhz, 128MB Ram pc standing here, and I'm thinking of installing >kde3 on there, does anyone know if that will be an alright combination or would that >be very slow / not worth it? I have an athlon 1800+, can I just remove my

Re: KDE3 port failed

Don't send html mail: I can't/won't read it. Kris msg11706/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: KDE3 port failed

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:40:23PM +, Bo Xiao wrote: > > Hi, > > Running 5.0-RC. Hit the same problem since 5.0-DP2. > > Anyone else seeing it? Looks like you didn't follow the directions in UPDATING and you have stale includes. Kris msg11693/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: KDE3 port failed

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 6:40 pm, Bo Xiao wrote: > Hi, > > Running 5.0-RC. Hit the same problem since 5.0-DP2. > > Anyone else seeing it? > > Bo Xiao I would head over to http://fruitsalad.org.. i believe the last successful build on -current was 3.0.3-1. A mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] may get yo

Re: KDE3, qt30, qt23

On Saturday 13 July 2002 09:28 pm, Jeff wrote: > Hi All, > > I am having difficulties with this matter.. > > What I am wanting is to use an application and run KDE3. > KDE3 requires qt30. > The application requires qt23. > It appears that qt23 and qt30 are (or at least the headers are) > incompati