Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Alex, you would lose that bet, zlib 1.2.2 has a hole in it, it
should have been replaced with 1.2.3 See the zlib website
for more info.
Nospam, good catch, if none of the hip-shooters here file a PR I'll
get around to it the next time I get a running build off the
cvs.
did i ever mention i love communities! ;-)
well, 1st of all, thx 2 all the people who gave it a whirl and
went deeper into cvs as i would ever do (i'm definitely not a
dev ;-), btw. that was my reason for asking this on the list )
2nd, the thing alex brought up is very confusing, because it
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:18:08AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Alex, you would lose that bet, zlib 1.2.2 has a hole in it, it
should have been replaced with 1.2.3 See the zlib website
for more info.
Nospam, good catch, if none of the hip-shooters here file a PR
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:42:44PM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:42:44PM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:07:11PM +0200, martinko wrote:
and it feels they're not going to release 1.0 any time soon.. i've been
seeing 0.9.something for longer than i can remember.
and btw i've always thought of openssl and openssh as somehow
coupled/interconnected. but openssl hasn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:00 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
did i ever mention i love
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Alex Zbyslaw
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
So unless the fixes somehow were un
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:55:06 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi together,
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss on the list for my understanding.
why are some major parts of the os are not updated to the
current
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss on the list for my understanding.
why are some major parts of the os are not updated to the
current versions (see examples beyond)? code-improvements
and
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions through the
ports. Not an option for everything -- I see no zlib for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions through the
ports. Not
In the last episode (Apr 11), [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net said:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Zbyslaw
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:25 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found
Hi All,
nospam, I just checked the cvs, and they did catch zlib, 1.2.3 is in
there now. /usr/src/lib/libz.
BETA4 is older than the current cvs
Note that some programs (cvs) seem to have copies of zlib.c that are
older, maybe that's
what your seeing?
as for openssl, it is still at 0.9.7e
17 matches
Mail list logo
