On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:14:01 +0100, Frank Wißmann
wrote:
> I did it now the way you told me but it still shows 7.0-Release at
> uname -a. I attach my "make.conf" and "cvs-supfile"' maybe there is
> something wrong?
I've found something strange in the CVSup files:
Your file
On Thursday 19 February 2009 08:14:01 Frank Wißmann wrote:
> I did it now the way you told me but it still shows 7.0-Release at
> uname -a. I attach my "make.conf" and "cvs-supfile"' maybe there is
> something wrong?
Yep. You're using the cvs-supfile, which does not update the source tree, but
m
Am Donnerstag 19 Februar 2009 10:53:43 schrieb Polytropon:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0100, Frank Wißmann
wrote:
> > Well, I used your settings of "default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7",
> > but the answer is still this:
> > FreeBSD grissom.einundvierzig.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE
> > #
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0100, Frank Wißmann
wrote:
> Well, I used your settings of "default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7", but
> the answer is still this:
> FreeBSD grissom.einundvierzig.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0:
> Wed Feb 18 21:36:57 CET 2009
> r...@grissom.einundvierzig.o
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Frank Wißmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann
> wrote:
>> > What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I
>> > desire? What do I need to change to get my wante
Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann
wrote:
> > What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I
> > desire? What do I need to change to get my wanted results?
>
> Are you sure you have the correct sources? How
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 13:14:58 -0600 Frank Wißmann
wrote:
Hello, list!
When I try to build my new world with todays sources I don't get
properly what I want. I configured my cvs-supfile with
"default tag=7_STABLE"
Should be default tag=RELENG_7
--
Paul Schmehl (pa...@utdallas.e
7_STABLE is incorrect.
. = CURRENT
RELENG_X = X-STABLE
RELENG_X_Y = X.Y-RELEASE
so you probably want RELENG_7
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:14 +0100, Frank Wißmann wrote:
> Hello, list!
> When I try to build my new world with todays sources I don't get
> properly what I want. I configured my cvs-sup
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann
wrote:
> What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I desire?
> What do I need to change to get my wanted results?
Are you sure you have the correct sources? How did you update them?
I'm using the following settings (as an exa
Christopher Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simple question: how can I tell what version of the system binaries
> I'm running? Flame-proofing follows.
>
> Searches on this mailing list and google tell me 'uname -a' is the
> ticket, but that doesn't seem to get what I want.
No, it isn't. Tha
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote borg thusly...
>
> I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
> of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
> multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
> mind using a non-GUI based application.
Try sunclock in astro/sunclock.
Under KDE
KDEMenu / toys / worldclock
puts up a world map that shows the correct time for
most capital cities when the city is under the mouse cursor
mjt
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 05:40, epilogue wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:26 -0800 (PST)
> borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:26 -0800 (PST)
borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
> of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
> multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
> mind using a non-GUI based application.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:01:26AM -0800, borg wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
> of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
> multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
> mind using a non-GUI based application.
You could run xcl
* Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041017 13:21]: wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering if anybody can tell me how I can build sendmail from
> world with LDAP support. I currently have SASL support enabled in
> make.conf (copied examples from defaults/make.conf) and hoped it might
> be possibl
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote:
> I'm just wondering if anybody can tell me how I can build sendmail from
> world with LDAP support. I currently have SASL support enabled in
> make.conf (copied examples from defaults/make.conf) and hoped it might
> be possible to d
At 2004-01-23T22:53:00Z, Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NFS seems to be the common idea here ;)
One other possibility: if you don't want to set up NFS for some reason,
rsync is an exquisitely nice system for synchronizing directory trees. You
can cvsup one machine, then use rsync to
> CVSuping the source won't take too long. Even on dialup. Setup your source sup
> for late at night if you can.
>
> I'm willing to bet that doing a make world will take longer then your CVSup of
> source.
I can second that. Upgrading from one release of FreeBSD to another
didn't take more than
NFS seems to be the common idea here ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:45 PM
To: Brian H
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: world
"Brian H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I don't want
Create an NFS share and distribute the source using that.
You cvsup one computer, and then you have it on all of them.
-Original Message-
From: Brian H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: world
The reason I don't wa
"Brian H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines
> to do the update on and I don't want to do the download for each
> machine.
Can't they "talk" to each other without being connected to the
Internet?
My own approach is to have a sing
You could look into nfs exporting /usr/src to all of your machines.
along with /usr/obj, you could also cut down to only having to build once.
~j
Brian H wrote:
> The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines to
> do the update on and I don't want to do the download for e
The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines to do
the update on and I don't want to do the download for each machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 January 2004 03:21 pm, Brian H wrote:
Greetings:
Problem: I do not have a fast internet conne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 January 2004 03:21 pm, Brian H wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Problem: I do not have a fast internet connection at home and I want to
> upgrade my freebsd from release to stable. For the ports tree I download
> the file ftp1.freebsd.org/pub/FreeB
24 matches
Mail list logo
