On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I've got a question that is likely not suited for this list, but I know
> that there are people here who can guide me off-list.
>
> Being a network engineer, I'm far from a developer. With that said, I've
> written numerous network automatio
On May 8, 2009 01:09:51 am Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I've got a question that is likely not suited for this list, but I know
> that there are people here who can guide me off-list.
>
> Being a network engineer, I'm far from a developer. With that said, I've
> written numerous network automation progr
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Mike Jeays wrote:
> On May 8, 2009 01:09:51 am Steve Bertrand wrote:
> > I've got a question that is likely not suited for this list, but I know
> > that there are people here who can guide me off-list.
> >
> > Being a network engineer, I'm far from a developer. Wi
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Mike Jeays wrote:
I would keep away from the term 'public domain', which means you would lose
any rights to it whatsoever.
Public Domain does NOT invalidate Copyright : The owner of the work is the
copyright holder .
Public Do
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:09:51AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I've got a question that is likely not suited for this list, but I know
> that there are people here who can guide me off-list.
>
> Being a network engineer, I'm far from a developer. With that said, I've
> written numerous network
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:09:51AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> I'm looking for advice on how I can take all of my code, and license it
> into the public domain. I'm sure that most people won't have any
> interest in it, but I really want to ensure that what I have done is
> freely accessible.
Chad Perrin wrote:
[..huge snip..]
> I hope you get some value from my rambling.
I have gained very much value from what everyone has had to say, and I
want to thank everyone.
Although I have very much reading to do, I've come to a few conclusions
thus far.
One thing that did not cross my mind
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:47:52AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> One thing that did not cross my mind prior was regarding the comments
> Chad made, use in media other than within the programming scope itself.
I think that's an important consideration that most programmers overlook.
One of the
I omitted sending this reply to Chris to the list by mistake. Please
correct me if I am wrong.
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 11:06, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Quick question
>
> I'm not sure about the license that FreeBSD falls under. Are we allowed to modify
> code (specifically /sb
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:05:45AM +0100, Elektronix Support wrote:
> Dear support / sales,
FreeBSD does not have the sort of corporate structure you're
expecting: basically it's a bunch of people who have got together to
write an operating system. You've connected to a mailing list used
for answ
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Elektronix Support wrote:
> versions of FreeBSD on our hardware solutions, and sell to him. The
> organization we will sell this to is the end-user.
..
> I need to know if we can install FreeBSD and charge our customer for this,
> or if there are restrictions we must be awar
[freebsd-emulation cut from cc]
On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
The question is that can we extract and provide these binaries in a
simple tar.gz file or is that considered a GPL/LGPL violation? The
sources are freely available on slackware.com, but we are not sure
doin
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kövesdán Gábor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries
> [freebsd-emulation cut from cc]
>
>
Ted Mittelstaedt schrieb:
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kövesdán Gábor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries
[freebsd-em
On Feb 25, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Thanks for the answers to both of you.
Szivesen
We just modify the packaging of the file: gzipped tarball instead
of floppy images, so it will be fine to redistribute them with the
pointer to the sources then.
Yes.
As a shameless plug,
15 matches
Mail list logo
