# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-13 09:38:58 +1000:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:03, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-07 09:52:44 +1000:
> > >
> > > um ... what's wrong with doing this in /etc/make.conf?
> > >
> > > NO_BIND = true
> > > NO_OPENSSL = true
> > > NO_SENDMAIL = tru
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 23:03, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-07 09:52:44 +1000:
> >
> > um ... what's wrong with doing this in /etc/make.conf?
> >
> > NO_BIND = true
> > NO_OPENSSL = true
> > NO_SENDMAIL = true
> >
> > and so on.
> >
> > Seems to be exactly what you want
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-07 09:52:44 +1000:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 00:42, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Daniel Goepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
> > > embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out
On 1/9/03 at 7:09 PM Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
|Hello all,
|
|I've installed Postfix MTA on my machine and I'm have a few questions
|pertinent to it.
[snip]
=
The Postfix users mailing list is a very helpful place for problems and
questions such as your.
http://www.postfix.org/li
[quoting cleaned up]
on 1/8/03 12:50 AM, Daniel Goepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 1/7/03 11:29 PM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>>> on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Ja
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade.
This process
> >> left e
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
> >> left
on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>
> [...]
>> The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
>> left everything I had intact except I lost my sendmail soft link which had
>> po
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 at 22:32:42 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
> > Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > I don't know why you're talking about cvsup; cvsup is not relevant
> > to this; it is a method for downloading files, primarily from cvs
> > archives. What you're looking for is changing the base system
> > it
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 at 22:32:42 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
> > Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > I don't know why you're talking about cvsup; cvsup is not relevant
> > to this; it is a method for downloading files, primarily from cvs
> > archives. What you're looking for is changing the base system
> > it
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
[...]
> The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
> left everything I had intact except I lost my sendmail soft link which had
> pointed to the sendmail replacement provided by qmail. The link was
> re
sendmail (or bind, etc).
>
>--Adam
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:37 AM
>Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
>
>
>> Not to miss out on the party ei
Adam Maas wrote:
Definitely keep them included, but not so closely tied to the core
installation. Perhaps take a page from Slackware, which includes them by
default, even on a minimal install, but you can manually deselect them if
you don't wish sendmail (or bind, etc).
See /usr/src/release/pico
From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
> Not to miss out on the party either, but I'd like it on record that there
> are also people, like me, who like things like sen
Not to miss out on the party either, but I'd like it on record that there
are also people, like me, who like things like sendmail and Perl, etc,
included in the FreeBSD distribution. :) I had to install these packages
anyway, and found it very useful to see them already included.
I recompiled send
On 2003-01-06 19:48, Daniel Goepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >Then do it. If it works, I doubt there will be much trouble
> >getting it accepted into the system.
>
> [...]
> If someone can save me some time in searching, where is the source
> that controls what is install
having problems with.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions'
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
"Daniel Goepp" &l
"Daniel Goepp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> >Then do it. If it works, I doubt there will be much trouble getting
> >it accepted into the system.
>
> Well yes, I would love to.
>
> Plus, why
> invent the wheel
freebsd-config, and it would appear to be a
> largely dead list.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peace.
>
> -Daniel
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:42 AM
&
nfig, and it would appear to be a
largely dead list.
Thanks.
Peace.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Daniel Goepp
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duncan Anker
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:53 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions; Daniel Goepp
Cc: Lowell Gilbert
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 00:42, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Daniel G
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 00:42, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Daniel Goepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
> > embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out. When
> > are they going to make the FreeBSD install conf
Daniel Goepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
> embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out. When
> are they going to make the FreeBSD install configurable enough to not have
> to include sendmail, bind, open
On 5 Nov 2002, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> In your case it may also be useful to enable debugging in smtpd by
> modifying master.cf and adding a -v line, and then restarting postfix
> with postfix reload.
Turns out the problem was that postfix didn't have access to the
/var/pwcheck directory. Putting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("H. Wade Minter") writes:
> This is a tale of two postfix installs.
>
> Install one was on a clean 4.7 system, and works like a charm. Using
> pwcheck_pam, everything's peachy.
>
> On the other system, also a 4.7 install, currently running sendmail, I'm
> attempting to migrat
Hi.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:18:20 +0100
Michael Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no local interface, 127.0.0.1 inside a jail, only the IP
> address that the jail has been given.
Ah ok.
> You need to tell postfix to startup on the same IP address that the
> jail has been given. Do this
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Axel Gruner wrote:
> ct 18 09:20:08 briefzentrum postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix
> mail system Oct 18 09:20:08 briefzentrum postfix/master[481]: fatal:
> parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for 127.0.0.1
> So, what is the proble
401 - 427 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
