On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has
> been
> asked by someone from that domain.
>
True but juniper has given a great of IP to BSD. Gracefully handling some
runoff seems appropriate.
--
Adam Vande Mo
On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
> the "res" command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
> FreeBSD OS.
>
> Most especially since you're "helping" what sounds like a member of the
> p
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has been
asked by someone from that domain.
"Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like work."
Thomas Alva Edison
Inventor of 1093 patents, including:
The lig
As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
the "res" command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
FreeBSD OS.
Most especially since you're "helping" what sounds like a member of the
press, therefore you SHOULD have / SOME / idea of what you are d
Joanne,
I did a quick which and search of the ports that yielded nothing
concrete regarding this command. I believe that this a proprietary
Juniper utility. I found similar reference to this at this url:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,124019,124019
As much as I hate p
On 1 August 2010, at 03:42, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
>> are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
>> above .5 and memory usually shows over half free. I
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
> are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
> above .5 and memory usually shows over half free. I have never seen
> it even close to the limit (in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/06/2010 04:34:10, Richards, Toby wrote:
> So as far as I can tell, turning Linux Mode on exposes another threat
> vector. Can I turn on Linux Mode ONLY for a single binary (the Flash
> plugin)?
Unfortunately no. Enabling the linuxulator loads a
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Question RE: Linux Mode
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:57:33 -0700, "Richards, Toby"
wrote:
> My question is this: If I turn on Linux mode, don't I sacrifice the
> security, performance, and other benefits of the FreeBSD kernel vice
> Linux?
No. FreeBSD's &q
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:57:33 -0700, "Richards, Toby"
wrote:
> My question is this: If I turn on Linux mode, don't I sacrifice the
> security, performance, and other benefits of the FreeBSD kernel vice
> Linux?
No. FreeBSD's "Linux mode" is nothing more or less than an ABI - an
alternative binary
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Antonio Vieiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> So if I need a more advanced version of some software, that has been
> installed as a package, I can use portupgrade (or other port
> management tools) to upgrade the package to a port. Am I right?
The packages are bui
Hi,
Ah, I see.
So if I need a more advanced version of some software, that has been
installed as a package, I can use portupgrade (or other port
management tools) to upgrade the package to a port. Am I right?
Thanks,
Antonio
(As a newbie I'm somewhat concerned about keeping consistency between
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
> Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
>
> I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
> same so
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Vinay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to FreeBSD. I have installed FreeBSD 6.3 and was playing with
> gvinum.
>
>
> Can you let me know what am i missing?
>
You should use a current release of FreeBSD, if 6.3 is still supported it
won't be for much longer.
Use the 8.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Dino Vliet wrote:
> Hi freebsd folks,
>
> I'm having troubles installing some ports because I'm behind a restrictive pf
> firewall. I've heard that this could
> be circumvented if I use a ftp_proxy. I have this debian server that can
> access ftp sites and I inst
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:57:35PM -0400, jon wrote:
> To whom it concerns,
>
> I am a relatively basic/amateur computer user and I just noticed
> today that my "recent servers" lists "Free BSD".
>
> I do not knowingly connect to any outside servers and am concerned
> that any server has been
On 5/15/10 5:57 PM, jon wrote:
To whom it concerns,
Not us, really. This strikes me much more as a Mac OS or local network
support issue.
I am a relatively basic/amateur computer user and I just noticed today
that my "recent servers" lists "Free BSD".
Your "recent servers" list where? We n
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 11:10 -0500, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello all.
> I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I have read archives
> and do gogled searches but would like , if possible, to hear comments
> based on experience.
>
> I have a machine, pentium D 2.4mhz 2gb RAM, 160DD HD XP Pro
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 16:50:20 Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Michael Powell
wrote:
> > 王跃辉 wrote:
> >> hi
> >> I have a problem when I try to install FreeBSD as client OS on a
> >> Linux OS.
> >
> > Sorry, but this does not make any sense to me. How are you tryi
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> 王跃辉 wrote:
>
>> hi
>> I have a problem when I try to install FreeBSD as client OS on a Linux
>> OS.
>
> Sorry, but this does not make any sense to me. How are you trying to install
> FreeBSD on Linux? FreeBSD is an operating system, not
>>> 王跃辉 04/21/10 10:21 AM >>>
>hi
> I have a problem when I try to install FreeBSD as client OS on a
Linux
>OS. following the instruction I find that I can't open the website of
>www.fsmware.com to finish some download work. it seems that the dns
server
>don't support the address in China Mainla
Hello!
I presume you are talking about running FreeBSD as a guest OS in Xen or
the like.
Let me point you to this URL, it contains a lot of useful information on
what you're seeking.
The fsmware.com website seems down, and has been for awhile. The
documentation is
just out of date.
http://wiki.
王跃辉 wrote:
> hi
> I have a problem when I try to install FreeBSD as client OS on a Linux
> OS.
Sorry, but this does not make any sense to me. How are you trying to install
FreeBSD on Linux? FreeBSD is an operating system, not an application.
> following the instruction I find that I can't
on it.
From: "Kruppa, Peter Ulrich"
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sun, April 18, 2010 6:50:04 PM
Subject: Re: Question. Multi Boot
Am 18.04.2010 18:10, schrieb Jorge Biquez:
> Hello all.
> I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I have read arch
At 05:04 p.m. 18/04/2010, you wrote:
On 4/18/10 12:50 PM, Kruppa, Peter Ulrich wrote:
Since Windows isn't very cooperative with other operating systems,
leave it where it is, buy a second hard disk and install FreeBSD
(and Linux) on it. The FreeBSD bootmanager will be able to boot
Windows but
On 4/18/10 12:50 PM, Kruppa, Peter Ulrich wrote:
Since Windows isn't very cooperative with other operating systems,
leave it where it is, buy a second hard disk and install FreeBSD (and
Linux) on it. The FreeBSD bootmanager will be able to boot Windows but
Windows will not boot any FreeBSD or
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I have read archives and do
gogled searches but would like , if possible, to hear comments based on
experience.
I have a machine, pentium D 2.4mhz 2gb RAM, 160DD HD XP Pro. As I mentuioned
in
Am 18.04.2010 18:10, schrieb Jorge Biquez:
Hello all.
I hope this question does not sound so stupid. I have read archives
and do gogled searches but would like , if possible, to hear comments
based on experience.
I have a machine, pentium D 2.4mhz 2gb RAM, 160DD HD XP Pro. As I
mentuioned in
2010/4/14 Дмитрий Бехтерев
> Hello all!
> I want use redundant scheme for booting my OS.
>
Most would use gmirror, zfs mirror, or a hardware based solution instead of
your approach.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html
--
Adam Vande More
Manish Jain wrote:
> When you execute a script ... the aliases are
> ignored. Is there some way to fix this ...
Search for expand_aliases in the bash manpage.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 27), Manish Jain said:
I am used to the normal GNU-version of expr (also available on Solaris)
and much prefer it over the FreeBSD version. The GNU version allows
internal commands like length, substring and others which make it much
easier to work wit
In the last episode (Mar 27), Manish Jain said:
> I am used to the normal GNU-version of expr (also available on Solaris)
> and much prefer it over the FreeBSD version. The GNU version allows
> internal commands like length, substring and others which make it much
> easier to work with. Is there
Hi,
Graeme Dargie wrote:
> Hello List,
>
>
>
> I understand this is possible but cant seem to find any how to`s or
> guides out on the net, I would like to set up a jail running FreeBSD 8.0
> i386 on a system that is running FreeBSD 8.0 amd64. I know this may
> sound somewhat odd but I have a
On 2/27/10, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
>>
>> I understand this is possible but cant seem to find any how to`s or
>> guides out on the net, I would like to set up a jail running FreeBSD 8.0
>> i386 on a system that is running FreeBSD 8.0 amd64.
>>
> JAILS requires host and client systems source code in
>
> I understand this is possible but cant seem to find any how to`s or
> guides out on the net, I would like to set up a jail running FreeBSD 8.0
> i386 on a system that is running FreeBSD 8.0 amd64.
>
JAILS requires host and client systems source code in sync. So that makes it
impossible to run
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:29:04 +0100
Ivan Voras articulated:
> Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> > It's not officialy supported, but it still works.
> > You have to link some libraries to give them their freebsd 6.2
> > names.
> >
> > I had to do it for the servers we sell at work.
> > It works perfectl
Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
It's not officialy supported, but it still works.
You have to link some libraries to give them their freebsd 6.2 names.
I had to do it for the servers we sell at work.
It works perfectly.
I'm glad it works, and it is not surprising. It would be easier for a
company t
It's not officialy supported, but it still works.
You have to link some libraries to give them their freebsd 6.2 names.
I had to do it for the servers we sell at work.
It works perfectly.
Samuel Martín Moro
CamTrace
{EPITECH.} tek4
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:51:48 +0100
Ivan Voras articulated:
Robert wrote:
Hello
I have zend framework websites and I was wondering if they work
well with Freebsd7.2?
Because I hear bad thing about that. Can you tell me about that
please?
Zend Framework is PHP? PHP works on FreeB
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:51:48 +0100
Ivan Voras articulated:
> Robert wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have zend framework websites and I was wondering if they work
> > well with Freebsd7.2?
> >
> > Because I hear bad thing about that. Can you tell me about that
> > please?
>
> Zend Framework is PHP?
Robert wrote:
Hello
I have zend framework websites and I was wondering if they work well with
Freebsd7.2?
Because I hear bad thing about that. Can you tell me about that please?
Zend Framework is PHP? PHP works on FreeBSD, Zend Framework will also
work. Unless you give more specific questio
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:07:06 +, davidowe...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Hello there how do i install freebsd to my dedicated server
I may politely point you at FreeBSD's excellent online
documentation, the handbook and the FAQ, which you'll
find here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handb
ill...@gmail.com writes:
> You aren't going to gain much in speed or size savings, so
> do take care to understand what you hope to gain.
While I haven't done even an eyeball check recently, not too
long ago the size savings for an aggressively pruned kernel could be
quite noticable; t
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:46:27 -0500
"ill...@gmail.com" wrote:
> You aren't going to gain much in speed or size savings, so
> do take care to understand what you hope to gain. If you
> wish to shorten kernel compile times and reduce the size of
> /boot, have a look at the MODULES_OVERRIDE and
> WI
2009/12/19 Jamie Griffin :
> Hi
>
> I have been reading the handbook to learn about building a custom
> kernel, but just wanted to ask something about gathering information
> about my hardware before I give it a go.
>
> The handbook suggests the command:
>
> # pciconf -lv
>
> ...which I like becaus
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 04:13:09PM +, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> The handbook suggests the command:
>
> # pciconf -lv
>
> On my system, this command does print out information for quite a few
> components, I just wondered if this information is all I need to work
> from or is it not an accurate
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:41:14AM -0700, Tim Judd wrote:
> Can I ask for more details from you why you're interested in building
> a custom kernel?
> --TJ
Thanks for the information Tim. I don't have a specific need to build a
custom kernel at the moment, I really just want to learn how to do
On 12/19/09, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been reading the handbook to learn about building a custom
> kernel, but just wanted to ask something about gathering information
> about my hardware before I give it a go.
>
> The handbook suggests the command:
>
> # pciconf -lv
>
> ...which I lik
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
d...@safeport.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Xorg defaults to a black screen instead of a checkerboard pattern these
days.
You can revert to the old style with -retro flag to X .If things are working
you should see the ol
d...@safeport.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Xorg defaults to a black screen instead of a checkerboard pattern
these days.
You can revert to the old style with -retro flag to X .If things are
working you should see the old style screen with an X mouse pointer (if
ena
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, d...@safeport.com wrote:
All variations give me a black screen with the keyboard locked. startx,
xdm and xorg all do the same.
Does ctrl-alt-f1 switch to the console? If so, good news--it's working.
You need to run dbus and hal
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, d...@safeport.com wrote:
All variations give me a black screen with the keyboard locked. startx,
xdm and xorg all do the same.
Does ctrl-alt-f1 switch to the console? If so, good news--it's working.
You need to run dbus and hal as per the Handbook page. Or disable hal,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, doug wrote:
I have a IBM thinkpad T42p. xorg 7.4 is pretty much a disaster for me.
First I wonder if anyone has gotten 7.4 to work on this or similar
hardware. The system is 3+ years old when it was still IBM.
My T42--no P--is th
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 07:15:58 doug wrote:
I have a IBM thinkpad T42p. xorg 7.4 is pretty much a disaster for me.
First I wonder if anyone has gotten 7.4 to work on this or similar
hardware. The system is 3+ years old when it was still IBM.
I
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, doug wrote:
I have a IBM thinkpad T42p. xorg 7.4 is pretty much a disaster for me. First
I wonder if anyone has gotten 7.4 to work on this or similar hardware. The
system is 3+ years old when it was still IBM.
My T42--no P--is the only system that the new Xorg has worked
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 07:15:58 doug wrote:
> I have a IBM thinkpad T42p. xorg 7.4 is pretty much a disaster for me.
> First I wonder if anyone has gotten 7.4 to work on this or similar
> hardware. The system is 3+ years old when it was still IBM.
>
> I have done this a time or two starting
Yan, Yeqing wrote:
Hi:
I'm from Intel China. Our project use FreeBSD 7.0
> and I have some questions about the FreeBSD syscall.
I don't know how to use these syscall below.
Is there having some doc or example about how to use these syscall?
kse_exit
kse_wakeup
kse_create
kse_thr_interrupt
kse
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 278, Issue 4, Message 2
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:36:00 +0800 (WST) Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> >> NX5000, 2MB
On 9/29/09, Polytropon wrote:
> Honestly, I've never seen the need for extended DOS partitions.
> Let's say you intendedly want to run a multi-OS system, then
> you can install four systems, each one in its own slice, and
> within the slice, the partitiions, if needed and supported.
By using
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:36:00 +0800 (WST), Bret Busby wrote:
> See
> http://busby.net/bret/Screenshot--dev-sda-GParted.png
I think I do understand. You have:
1. a primary DOS partition which contains
a NTFS file system
2. an extended DOS partition containing "subpar
Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
>>
>> Bret Busby wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
>>> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>>
>> I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that the Li
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
Issue
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:01:18PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in Issue
> 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:01:18 +0800 (WST), Bret Busby wrote:
> From what I understand, FreeBSD (and possibly all BSD) uses hard
> disc slices rather than partitions, and therefore cannot
> easily be installed in a free partition, but needs for
> hard disc slices to be used.
I see a terminology pr
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:01:18 +0800 (WST)
Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
> Issue 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2 on
Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been interested in installing FreeBSD on my laptop (HP/Compaq
> NX5000, 2MB RAM), in a free 20MB partition.
I really hope you meant Gb here ;)
>
> I noticed that the Linux Format magazine to which I subscribe, in
> Issue 124, comes with FreeBSD 7.2 on the DVD
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:08:17AM -0700, Jason wrote:
> I was wondering in the case of openssl:
>
> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl.asc
>
> Corrected: 2009-04-22 14:07:14 UTC (RELENG_7, 7.2-PRERELEASE)
> 2009-04-22 14:07:14 UTC (RELENG_7_2, 7
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Zohreh wrote:
From: Zohreh
Subject: Re: question
To: "Giorgos Keramidas"
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:43 PM
Dear Sir/Madam
tahnk you fo your reply , i have checked my squid setting , and ftp_passive
=on ,
i disabled firewall and brows ftp sit
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> 2009/7/22 asdasd asdasd :
>> Hello. Sorry for ny bad english. :)
>> My trouble - I install BSD on first computer, after than plug hard drive
>> into other computer, but it doesn`t work! Can you help? After booting BIOS
>> FreeBSD print "Can`t
2009/7/22 asdasd asdasd :
> Hello. Sorry for ny bad english. :)
> My trouble - I install BSD on first computer, after than plug hard drive into
> other computer, but it doesn`t work! Can you help? After booting BIOS FreeBSD
> print "Can`t load kernel". What did I must do?
>
> Thanks %)
>
Did you
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Zohreh wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam
>
> i have a question about free bsd and squid that was installed on it.
> i insatlled squid 2.6 stabled 20 on freebsd 7. and i enabled firewall
> on freebsd . now i brows http sites on internet but i cannot brows
> ftp si
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:28:16PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT), Zohreh wrote:
> > Dear Sir/Madam
> > ?
> > i have a question about free bsd and squid that?was?installed on it.
> > i insatlled squid 2.6 stabled 20 on freebsd 7. and i enabled firewall
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT), Zohreh wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam
>
> i have a question about free bsd and squid that was installed on it.
> i insatlled squid 2.6 stabled 20 on freebsd 7. and i enabled firewall
> on freebsd . now i brows http sites on internet but i cannot brows
> ftp s
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:33:37PM +0100, João Pagaime wrote:
>> hello all
>>
>> any chance of the following NIC working with
>> the latests freeBSD release:
>>
>> Embedded HP NC362i Integrated Dual Port Gigabit Server Adaptor
>>
>> FreeBSD's hardware release notes dont l
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:33:37PM +0100, João Pagaime wrote:
> hello all
>
> any chance of the following NIC working with
> the latests freeBSD release:
>
> Embedded HP NC362i Integrated Dual Port Gigabit Server Adaptor
>
> FreeBSD's hardware release notes dont look very promising
Looks like a
In response to DJ Lawless :
>
> Do you need to become a member of freeBSD to get a freeBSD.org email address?
Yes.
> if yes how do you become a member?
Make enough contributions to the project that you get noticed and you'll be
invited.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:46:45 -0400
DJ Lawless wrote:
> Do you need to become a member of freeBSD to get a freeBSD.org email
> address?
>
> if yes how do you become a member?
If you have to ask, it's not going to happen.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
J. Julián Rodríguez writes:
> I´m a FreeBSD user from 4.0 version to Current (i386 arch). I've recently
> switched to a amd64 machine and
> consecuently to the amd64 version of the OS.
> You claim the amd64 version enjoys "Tier 1 Status", but in the page
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:06:14 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Thanks for your message. I checked up the list, which says that the
> D1560 is indeed supported, but it also says that the minimum version
> of hplip required for this is 2.8.5, while the latest port available
> is 2.8.
Jerry wrote:
According to the [1]http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html site, your
printer is supported. Install the '/print/hplip' port. Be sure to read the docu
mentation on configuring the program.
I have hplip and cups installed on my system to support two HP wireless printer
s,
> From: Manish Jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com
> Hi,
>
> I am about to buy a new printer (my first one actually) and my retailer
> strongly
> recommends HP's D1560 printer (USB). I am running ghostscript8-8.62_5 under
> FreeBSD 7.1 and I can't see this model listed anywhere in apsfilter. So I
On Apr 7, 2009, at 02:34, Chris Rees wrote:
\
So, the answer is NO, it does NOT cause data CORRUPTION. A simple
reboot solved it? Really, you're advocating guaranteed extended
downtime every time there's a power outage, compared with a slight
chance of a slightly longer downtime while every oth
>
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:12, Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> Can
>> no-one can come up with a reply either quoting a mailing list or
>> giving the circumstances when:
>>
>> a) Background fsck caused data CORRUPTION
>>
>> _and_
>>
>> b) A foreground fsck would not have done the same
>>
>> ?
2009/4/6 Doug Ha
On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:12, Chris Rees wrote:
Can
no-one can come up with a reply either quoting a mailing list or
giving the circumstances when:
a) Background fsck caused data CORRUPTION
_and_
b) A foreground fsck would not have done the same
?
Yes. When background FSCK first became stand
2009/4/6 Bruce Cran :
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:40:52 +0100
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme :
>> > Chris Rees wrote:
>> > > 2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
>> > > >
>> > > > IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
>> > >
>> > > Why?
>> >
>> > Google "background fsck damag
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:40:52 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme :
> > Chris Rees wrote:
> > > 2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
> > > >
> > > > IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Google "background fsck damage".
> >
> > I was bitten by it mysel
2009/4/5 Chris Rees :
> 2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme :
>> Chris Rees wrote:
>> > 2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
>> > >
>> > > IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
>> >
>> > Why?
>>
>> Google "background fsck damage".
>>
>> I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
>> backgro
2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme :
> Chris Rees wrote:
> > 2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
> > >
> > > IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
> >
> > Why?
>
> Google "background fsck damage".
>
> I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
> background fsck off. If your disks are la
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:36:32 +0200
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009 14:24:11 RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
> >
> > Mel Flynn wrote:
somebody please point me in the right direction ?
> > >
> > > fsck -p is done by default (meaning, filesystems are not fully
> > > sca
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:57:21 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
wrote:
> Google "background fsck damage".
>
> I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
> background fsck off. If your disks are large and you
> can't afford the fsck time, consider using ZFS, which
> has a lot of benefits b
Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
> >
> > IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
>
> Why?
Google "background fsck damage".
I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
background fsck off. If your disks are large and you
can't afford the fsck time, cons
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 14:24:11 RW wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
>
> Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:05:11 manish jain wrote:
> > > I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
> > > FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
> manish jain wrote:
> > Having bgfsck enabled is like
> > inviting a dragon to dinner when this happens.
>
> 2009/3/31 RW :
> > If you've done a normal install, soft-updates aren't enabled on /,
> >
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
manish jain wrote:
> Having bgfsck enabled is like
> inviting a dragon to dinner when this happens.
2009/3/31 RW :
> If you've done a normal install, soft-updates aren't enabled on /,
> so it will get foreground checked by default.
>
> If I were you I'd reboot i
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
manish jain wrote:
> As for the reason why I want to force fsck is that it has now
> happened 3 timed that, after a clean and proper shutdown - with no
> foreign filesystems mounted, FreeBSD has complained on system restart
> (twice on a 5.x distribution I had b
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:05:11 manish jain wrote:
>
> > I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
> > FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
> > to force an fsck on all filesystems at system
2009/3/31 manish jain :
> BTW, a lot of people who posted replies thought I was not aware that a preen
> is always executed at startup. When I said I wanted to force an fsck, I
> meant 'fsck -fy'. As for background checks, they are - in my opinion - a
> real nightmare. Even though I am just a lear
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:35:11 +0530
manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to force an fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On Linux, this
was simply a matt
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar :
>
> IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Why?
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:01:37 +0800, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:35:11 +0530
manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to force an fsck on all filesystems at system st
101 - 200 of 993 matches
Mail list logo
