On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Mervin McDougall wrote:
> hi
> I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
> problem if when my system starts it indicates that
> there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
> system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
> this a bad t
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Mervin McDougall wrote:
> hi
> I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
> problem if when my system starts it indicates that
> there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
> system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
> this a bad t
Mervin McDougall wrote:
I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a
problem if when my system starts it indicates that
there is some fragmentation of the files but the file
system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is
this a bad thing? Is this unusual?
No. It's normal.
[ Well, excessiv
On 2003-03-03 15:56, Clement Laforet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:50:40 +
> Audsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by
> > the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap.
> > I
On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:50:40 +
Audsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Respected Sir
>
> I am currently working in the fragmentation avoidance technique caused by
> the overhead introduced by MIP6. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and Kame Snap.
> I have introduced some code in netinet6/ip6_output.c code
