On 10/28/2012 04:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
pkg is able to make packages upgrade by itself. I think the good way
to update with packages is "pkg updgrade" then portupgrade to build the
ports without packages avalaible.
Anyway I had many problems with portupgrade and pkg (basically It was
n
Got it.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Le Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:22:32 +0300,
Alexander Kapshuk a écrit :
> Having done all of the above, I ran portupgrade to update all the
> pkgs that needed upgrading on my system, and got the message below:
> root@box0:/root/tmp # portupgrade -varRP --batch -L '%s_%s'
> USING PKGNG
> Packages are not
On 10/28/2012 2:16 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
>> /var/db/pkg.
>>
>> It also allows for binary package upgrades.
>>
>> If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there
On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
/var/db/pkg.
It also allows for binary package upgrades.
If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need to
use portupgrade anymore. Just 'pkg install name',
On 10/27/2012 1:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
>
> The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
> 20121015:
> AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
> AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
>
> Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
&& $pkgdb.with_pkgng?
STDERR.puts "Packages are not yet suported. Use pkg(8) directly."
return 0
end
Original Message ----
Subject: re: Portupgrade now supports pkgng [/usr/ports/UPDATING]
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:22:32 +0300
From: Alexander Kapshu
Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
20121015:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
make.conf,
and convert your databases.
This is optional
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from
> rt-3.8.8 to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
>
> Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such
>
On 2012-06-25 11:47, John Levine wrote:
You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says "don't
upgrade
every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency
chain I
need a newer version of a thing, then do it."
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system does
>You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says "don't upgrade
>every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency chain I
>need a newer version of a thing, then do it."
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system doesn't
distinguish between upgrades that pr
On 06/25/12 09:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun. With normal
On 06/25/12 10:40, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 06/25/12 09:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI chang
On 25/06/2012 08:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
> to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
>
> Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
> the libtool2.4 fun. With normal p
On 6/25/12 9:53 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
> to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
>
> Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
> the libtool2.4 fu
On 25 May 2012 12:10, Gary Aitken wrote:
> Has to be something stupid:
>
> 347 /usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep updating
> p5-XML-Twig-3.39 < needs updating (port has 3.40)
>
> 348 /usr/ports#portupgrade -Rv P5-XML-Twig
> ---> Session started at: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:03:54 -06
On Sunday 29 April 2012, dgmm wrote:
> When running portupgrade -cfa, is there any way to find out where it's up
> to and/ot what is still in the queue to be re-built?
Oops. It was obvious really.
ls /var/db/pkg -htU
...is good enough for my needs.
--
Dave
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:52:56 -0700
Cstdenis wrote:
> Portupgrade man page says "By default, portupgrade preserves shared
> libraries on uninstallation for safety."
>
> I ran i in the form of: portupgrade -b pcre
>
> Now /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 does not exist anymore, only the new
> /usr/lo
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:20 +, o...@aloha.com wrote:
> I too am stuck in ruby-portupgrade swamp :-)
>
> After a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.2 I built potupgrade, then did a
> portsnap and a portupgrade -a, in preparation to install Gnome2. When it
> stopped I followed the instructions in UPDA
On 10/07/2011 14:02, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE fo
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
>
> b. f. articulated:
> > This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
> > base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
> > RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
> > 8.2-RELEASE,
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
> This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
> base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
> RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
> 8.2-RELEASE, and so on.
Re
On 7/10/11, b. f. wrote:
> On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> You could cheat, and neither upgrade your base system nor make the
> changes I mentioned in my last message, but instead fool portupgrade
> into thinking that you have a newer base sy
On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
>
>> occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
>> that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
>> message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
>
> The '-' w
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
> occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
> that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
> message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
The '-' was a typo on my part. The machine I used f
Thomas D. Dean wrote:
...
> For the most recent try, I have
>
> ...
> # OS_PATCHLEVEL: "" "-p8"
> # OS_PLATFORM:"i386" "amd64"
> # OS_PKGBRANCH: "7-current" "6.1-release"
> OS_RELEASE="8-STABLE"
> OS_BRANCH="STABLE"
> OS_PKGBRANCH="8-stable"
The c
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:45 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> If I understood everything correctly, CVS (csup) and portsnap
> do both follow "the one tree" which gets frequently updated,
> and by the tag specified above you'll always get the current
> version of the tree. Getting older versions (e. g.
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:32:12 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>
> Sorry to answer my own post.
>
> The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
> relationship to 8.2-release.
>
> A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry to answer my own post.
The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
relationship to 8.2-release.
A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port tree with
*default release-cvs tag=.
ports-all
Today,
portsnap fetch ext
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 20:47 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > > /usr/bin/fetch -v
> > 'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
> > looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
> > connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
> > f
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > /usr/bin/fetch -v
> 'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
> looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
> connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
> fetch:
> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-S
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 14:15 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> > As root, I attempted to use
> > portupgrade -PPRv m4
> > which attempted to access
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
> > but failed - F
On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> As root, I attempted to use
> portupgrade -PPRv m4
> which attempted to access
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
> but failed - File unavailable (e.g. file not found, no access)
>
> I changed etc/
2011/2/11 ill...@gmail.com :
> On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re wrote:
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
>> "portupgrade samba" on 1st server it says
>> [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
>> argument] [Updating th
On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
> "portupgrade samba" on 1st server it says
> [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
> argument] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... -
> 2260
Try to move these files out of the way (all INDEX files and pkgdb.db)
/usr/ports/INDEX-*
/var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db
and run (it will take a while)
portsdb -Uu
as another option you can remove the files above and reinstall ruby
and ruby-bdb on those servers.
Are you running on version 7 or 8 ? are y
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:33:17PM +0300, c0re wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
> "portupgrade samba" on 1st server it says
> [/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
> argument] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/por
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:45:22 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> MASTER_SORT = http
I used to use
MASTER_SORT_REGEX = ^http
for this when a former ISP traffic shaped ftp
If you set "MASTER_SORT = http", then you get
://[^/]*http/ in MASTER_SORT_REGEX, so it looks like MASTER_SORT is
intended
On 14/01/2011 21:32, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it possible to force portupgrade to use only http protocol where
>> possible and skip the ftp servers?
>>
>> It's because currently I'm using very restrictive public access point whe
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to force portupgrade to use only http protocol where
> possible and skip the ftp servers?
>
> It's because currently I'm using very restrictive public access point where
> they block everything other than port 80 and I do
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:04:03 -0500, Warren Block
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
> ports taht have already been built on this run (I
> believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
> flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
> the named port depends
> -R
> --upward-recursi
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
> ports taht have already been built on this run (I
> believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
> flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
> the named port depends
On 3 January 2011 18:39, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>> > so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
>> > recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgr
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
> recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my
> ports soon and in the 18 months i've bee
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
> over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
> in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but
> sounds l
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but
sounds like it's best to change now.
jamie
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Rob" == Rob Farmer writes:
Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob> the other hand, Doug
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes:
>
> Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
> Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
> Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Sunday, 26 December 2010:
> > "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes:
>
> Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
> Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
> Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very respo
> "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes:
Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to issues with
Rob> portmaster and fixed this problem less
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 13:42, Bob Hall wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
>> But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
>> anymore,
>
> I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that
> someone had stopped main
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:01 +0800
xinyou yan wrote:
> if i use portupgrade -af --patch (it take much times)
>
what's "--patch"?
> And i don't finish it
> Then the second time . i do it again Does it continue or reupgrade
> anythins
It starts again. See pkg_glob(1) for how to avoid thi
On 12/05/2010 10:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Yuri writes:
>
>> Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such
>> message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like
>> this:
>> kern.maxproc: 6164
>> kern.maxprocperuid: 5547
>>
>> What may be causing such cond
Yuri writes:
> Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such
> message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like
> this:
> kern.maxproc: 6164
> kern.maxprocperuid: 5547
>
> What may be causing such condition?
limits(1), perhaps?
_
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ron (Lists) wrote:
None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in front
of the port name before.
It's not needed.
The tab expansion is handled by bash-completion as used to be smart
enough to know the command I was typing and could auto-complete port
na
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, "Ron (Lists)" wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
get back is a command prompt. No error or any other message.
p
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ron (Lists) wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do anything. I
type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I get back is a
command prompt. No error or any other message. portversion seems to work
correctly, showing my out of d
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:12, Jerry wrote:
> Really! When did "r...@freebsd.org" drop the port? If he is not
> actively maintaining the port then perhaps he should inform the proper
> authority.
"He" is a mailing list.
ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/Makefile
Revision 1.256
Tue Jul 21 13:12:15 2009
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 10:32:05 -0800
Rob Farmer articulated:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:15, Ron (Lists) wrote:
> > None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in
> > front of the port name before. The tab expansion is handled by
> > bash-completion as used to be smart enough to
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:21:22AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
> anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
> get back is a command prompt. No error or any other message.
> portversion seems to work
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:15, Ron (Lists) wrote:
> None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in front
> of the port name before. The tab expansion is handled by
> bash-completion as used to be smart enough to know the command I was
> typing and could auto-complete port names,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:08:23 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, "Ron (Lists)" wrote:
>> I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
>> anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
>> get back is a command prompt. No error
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, "Ron (Lists)" wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
> anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
> get back is a command prompt. No error or any other message.
> portversion seems to work corre
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 12:57:03 -0500, Chris Brennan
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ron (Lists) wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
> anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all
> I get back is a command prompt. No error or a
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ron (Lists) wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do anything.
> I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I get back is a
> command prompt. No error or any other message. portversion seems to work
> correctly, s
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
> >
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
> > >
> > > to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
> > > regression test.
> >
> > It works for me. Which port is it failin
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
>
> David Southwell wrote:
> > Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
> >
> > to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
> > regression test.
>
> It works for me. Which port is it failing on
portupgrade -
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
David Southwell wrote:
> Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
> to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
> regression test.
>
It works for me. Which port is it failing on?
__
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
>
> David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > man portupgrade advises:
> > -f
> >
> > --forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
> >
> > is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
> >
> >
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> man portupgrade advises:
>
> -f
> --forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
> is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
> sion, or the port is held by
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
David Southwell articulated:
> man portupgrade advises:
>
> -f
> --forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
> is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
> sion, or the port is held by u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/06/2010 08:29:41, n dhert wrote:
> Why does it stop? Can it be avoided? Or can I make portupgrade -af start
> from where it got so far in the first run ?
portupgrade is written in ruby -- having its command interpreter ripped
out from underneath
On 23 June 2010 08:29, n dhert wrote:
> in the process of upgrading 7.2 -> 8.0, the last step is to recompile all
> ports
> (section 24.2.3 of freebsd manual)
> # portupgrade -f ruby
> # rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db
> # portugprade -f ruby18-bdb
> # rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /usr/ports/INDEX-*.db
>
> # p
03:39 PM
Subject: Re: portupgrade
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, b. f. wrote:
>> This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
>> csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
>
> I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u'
> and &
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, b. f. wrote:
This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u'
and 'pkgdb -aF' automatically, and a full-blown 'pkgdb -F' or 'pkgdb
-L' usually isn
>This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
>csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u'
and 'pkgdb -aF' automatically, and a full-blown 'pkgdb -F' or 'pkgdb
-L' usually isn't required unless there is an erro
.
> use the
> the --batch switch or put BATCH="yes" in make.conf IIRC.
>
That particular make.conf is in /etc
>
> But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C
> switch is the
> way to go.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, D?nielisz L?szl? wrote:
do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
root# portversion -v|grep php
php5-5.2.12 > succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-pcre-5.2.12> succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-session-5.2.12 > succeeds port (p
László wrote:
>Thank you everybody!
>Actually I use cvsup, and it is up to date, but now I give a try with portsnap.
It sounds like your index file or your portsdb are older than the rest
of your ports tree. Try running 'portsdb -Fu'.
b.
___
freebsd-qu
Szia Zsolt!
Thank you everybody!
Actually I use cvsup, and it is up to date, but now I give a try with portsnap.
László
From: Artifex Maximus
To: Dánielisz László
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 10:34:53 AM
Subject: Re
Szia László!
2010/2/8 Dánielisz László
> hi,
>
> do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
>
> root# portversion -v|grep php
> php5-5.2.12 > succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
> php5-pcre-5.2.12> succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
> php5-session-5.2.12 > succ
2010/2/8 Dánielisz László :
> hi,
>
> do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
>
> root# portversion -v|grep php
> php5-5.2.12 > succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
> php5-pcre-5.2.12 > succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
> php5-session-5.2.12 > succeeds port (por
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2010 21:38, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I wish I could remember. Just that something comes up every once in a while
> and I curse that the upgrade has stopped. :)
net/p5-Net
is one I always keep coming across that asks annoying questions.
> "Frank" == Frank Shute writes:
Frank> All the Perl ports I've installed (e.g p5-*) have just installed for
Frank> me without any curses options menu.
Lucky. :)
Frank> Although I'd describe you as a "Perl power user" and undoubtedly have
Frank> more Perl ports installed than I have.
r
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:26:49PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
> > "Frank" == Frank Shute writes:
>
> Frank> But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C switch is the
> Frank> way to go.
>
> Sadly, I've run across Perl ports that still ask questions, even when
> being run
> "Frank" == Frank Shute writes:
Frank> But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C switch is the
Frank> way to go.
Sadly, I've run across Perl ports that still ask questions, even when
being run from portupgrade, and -C doesn't help those.
I'm guessing from this description tha
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:59:53PM +0100, n dhert wrote:
>
> When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a package that displays
> an options menu and waits for a interactive response (like hitting OK to
> accept the defaults and continue). Is there way to specify that portupgrade
> should
On 07/02/2010 2:14 μ.μ., Dánielisz László wrote:
> I think you can try this:
>
> -y
> --yes
> Answer yes to all the questions. This option implies -v and negates -n .
>
> László
>
>
> On 2010.02.07., at 12:59, n dhert wrote:
>
> When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a package
I think you can try this:
-y
--yes
Answer yes to all the questions. This option implies -v and negates -n .
László
On 2010.02.07., at 12:59, n dhert wrote:
When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a package that displays
an options menu and waits for a interactive response
On Thursday 21 January 2010 10:34:59 pm n dhert wrote:
> Today there were about 7 portupgrades to qt4 packages.
> Upgrading 'qt4-rcc-4.5.3' to 'qt4-rcc-4.6.1' (devel/qt4-rcc) failed:
> ...
> c++ -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fPIC -Wall -W
> -DQT_BOOTSTRAPPED -DQT_
> LITE_UNICODE -DQT_NO_C
Jamie Griffin wrote:
been trying to portupgrade firefox3 for about a day but keep getting a
checksum mismatch error and the build stops. What do I need to do to get
it to upgrade?
Try deleting the firefox sources you downloaded previously and start again.
It seems your download somehow got cor
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:13:36PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>> The maintainer, ruby@, is aware of this; a check of the PR
>> database shows multiple open PRs, none critical but many serious
>> going back six months and more.
>
> As an aside,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0 2 * * 5 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -C
The e-mailed res
Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
>>> following entries in my crontab:
>>>
>>> 0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -D
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
>> following entries in my crontab:
>>
>> 0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
>> 0 2 * * 5 /usr/local/s
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0 2 * * 5 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -C
The e-mailed results simply say "env: ruby: No such file or
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:54PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> Try this;
>
> # cd /usr/ports/print/cups-client
> # make patch
> # cd work/cups-1.4.2
> Open Makedefs.in in an editor and remove @PIEFLAGS@ from line 143.
> # cd ../..
> # make
>
> It should then build OK. Tested on 8.0-RELEASE amd6
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:40:58PM -0600, Richard Kolkovich wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote:
> > In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client :
> > ...
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when
> > making
>
1 - 100 of 973 matches
Mail list logo
