On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote:
So, I have now done a long, painful
portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for
configuration settings.
I'm sure portupgrade has an option to do a recursive configure
before actual upgrade. If it doesn't you may look at
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote:
So, I have now done a long, painful
portrupgrade -a', having it stop regularly to prompt me for
configuration settings.
I'm sure portupgrade has an option to do a recursive configure
before
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:16:15PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 12:50 AM + 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote:
You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your
ports/packages.
Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR
My opinion is that you shouldn't use packages and compile from source
instead.
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:16:15 -0800
Paul Hoffman phoff...@proper.com wrote:
At 12:50 AM + 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote:
You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your
ports/packages.
Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR
Packages for a release are built against the ports tree that's
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote:
In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client :
...
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when
making
a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/crt1.o: could not read symbols:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Richard Kolkovich sarum...@sigil.orgwrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote:
In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client :
...
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when
making
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 07:47:03PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. I used freebsd-update to upgrade a system from 7.1
to 7.2. The main upgrade went fine, but upgrading the ports had huge
problems. It could not find most (but not all) of the packages to
upgrade. A typical part of
Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200
DA Forsyth d.fors...@ru.ac.za wrote:
[snip]
I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has
not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one.
How do I fix this?
You could try the following;
1) Update your ports tree.
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200
DA Forsyth d.forsyth at ru.ac.za wrote:
[snip]
I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has
not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one.
How do I fix this?
You could try the following;
Hiya all
Something weird going on with portupgrade (and maybe ports in
general) here. Somewhere between last months upgrade and this month,
portupgrade has started to ignore ports that are reported by
portversion as needing upgrading. The result is I have to force each
one, one at a
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:18:39 +0200
DA Forsyth d.fors...@ru.ac.za wrote:
[snip]
I saw someone ask about this in Google Groups on the 14th but he has
not got an answer yet, so I am not the only one.
How do I fix this?
You could try the following;
1) Update your ports tree.
2) Remove:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:22:37 am DA Forsyth wrote:
Hiya all
Something weird going on with portypgrade (and maybe ports in
general) here. Somewhere between last months upgrade and this month,
portupgrade has started to ignore ports that are reported by
portversion as needing
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by
(Bulgaria) AD
Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
08.07.2009 04:09
To
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
cc
Subject
Re: Portupgrade not handling dependencies
Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I
b. f. wrote:
But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run
shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be.
I've
[snip]
also noticed a few times it seemed like it was upgrading the same
version(s) over again. I just chalked this up to the ports system
Hi,
The missing switch is the -R parameter of portupdate.
I.e. portupgrade -vnyNbR
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
dan mesli...@yahoo.fr
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
08.07.2009 14:05
Please respond to
mesli...@yahoo.fr
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are
upgraded.
If this
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
For the past 2 weeks though I have to run portupgrade 2-3 times every
time I have more than one update because at least 1 port fails due to a
dependency(which is seemingly upgraded after it tries to upgrade the
other port). What the heck is going on and how do I fix it?
We obviously can't help
Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones)
that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today:
=== Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1
=== Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1
--- Cleaning out obsolete shared libraries
[Updating the pkgdb
On 7/8/09, Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com wrote:
Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones)
that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today:
=== Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1
=== Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1
---
Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I was aware it
wouldn't update that(no port for this perl module yet anyway).
If you notice, it doesn't proceed to install ffmpeg, i force it
to(highlighted by ):
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
2009/7/8 Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com
Well, it has been happening with just about every port(no specific ones)
that have a dependency which is also being built. An example from today:
=== Registering installation for libtheora-1.0_1
=== Cleaning for libtheora-1.0_1
---
On 7/8/09, Eric Sheesley eshee...@shadowlair.com wrote:
Actually, the bsdpan package is not the issue here. I was aware it
wouldn't update that(no port for this perl module yet anyway).
If you notice, it doesn't proceed to install ffmpeg, i force it
to(highlighted by ):
Yes, I
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
snip]
As seen above, libtheora built and installed just fine, but ffmpeg was
skipped for some reason. I ran portupgrade -a again and all worked
fine. This ways also occuring when I ran portupgrade -arR.
Ports tree is updated with cvsup each night. I don't
But I have seen portupgrade something and then a subsequent run
shows this port as being 'newer' than the version it's supposed to be. I've
portsdb -Fu runs `make fetchindex`, grabbing the INDEX* file from
whatever server you've told it to go to, and then rebuilds/updates the
portsdb from that.
On 03/07/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
For weeks now my usual portupgrade test has returned the same thing.
Actually, I'm not sure cvsup is updating my ports tree properly...
Connected to cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org
Updating collection ports-all/cvs
Finished successfully
Normally there's a lot more
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael P.
Souliermsoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure cvsup is updating my ports tree properly...
Connected to cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org
Updating collection ports-all/cvs
Finished successfully
I just changed to cvsup1.freebsd.org and the
David Collins davidcollins...@gmail.com writes:
I have several jails for the purpose of not trashing my root partition
with junk programs that I may not need and also to learn how to run
various system services, ie dns, http, mysql, samba etc. I have been
running them for a while and have
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
David Collins davidcollins...@gmail.com writes:
I have several jails for the purpose of not trashing my root partition
with junk programs that I may not need and also to learn how to run
On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:39:52 +0200 (CEST)
Pieter Donche pieter.don...@ua.ac.be wrote:
FreeBSD7.
I wanted to upgrade print/cups-base and print/hplip
From a portsnap run:
cups-base-1.3.9_3 needs updating (index has
1.3.10_1) hplip-2.8.2_3 needs
Pieter Donche escribió:
FreeBSD7. I wanted to upgrade print/cups-base and print/hplip
From a portsnap run:
cups-base-1.3.9_3 needs updating (index has 1.3.10_1)
hplip-2.8.2_3 needs updating (index has 2.8.2_4)
# cd /usr/ports/print/cups
#
Sniper skrev:
I have strange problem with portupgrade.
--$ sudo portupgrade -a
** Port directory not found: x11/libxfce4mcs
** Port directory not found: x11-themes/xfce4-icon-theme
** Port directory not found: sysutils/xfce4-mcs-manager
** There are errors in a meta info for
On Saturday 18 April 2009 00:27:29 Sniper wrote:
--$ sudo pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale origin: 'x11/libxfce4mcs': perhaps moved or obsoleted.
- The port 'x11/libxfce4mcs' was removed on 2009-03-02 because:
got obsolete by xfce 4.6 update
- Hint:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:49:44 pm Canhua wrote:
hi,
I ran the following to upgrade on my 7.0-release FreBSD:
env
PACKAGEROOT=ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable
/Late st/ portupgrade -aPPR
The Handbook says this should be PACKAGESITE. When I set it in my
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Kent Stewart kstew...@owt.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:49:44 pm Canhua wrote: env
The Handbook says this should be PACKAGESITE. When I set it in my .cshrc, I
have setenv. I haven't set it on my 7-stable but on 6-stable, it looks like
setenv
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to /etc/make.conf.
Or use the --batch command line option to
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for
config questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote:
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions? I'd like to leave my laptop
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I'm upgrading a server from 6.4 to 7.1 and am going through the relative
pain of re-compiling all the ports. It's not as easy portupgrade -af
because of all the special handling instructions of many ports.
I have not found an easy way to keep track of the ports that
On Sat, April 4, 2009 14:06, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I'm upgrading a server from 6.4 to 7.1 and am going through the
relative pain of re-compiling all the ports. It's not as easy
portupgrade -af because of all the special handling instructions
of many ports.
I
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
What do we do about packages that fail to update?
This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
the ones where there is a configure error or uknown build error or
install error
FYI -- I followed
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:59PM -0700, gahn wrote:
Hi all:
Where is the result of portupgrade -fa stored at? it showed a bunch files
didn't go through or failed. just wondering whether I can take look at the
results after I rebooted the server.
If that's exactly how you ran
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked
fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power
on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
What
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over
again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart
the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Otherwise,
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
Please stop top-posting.
Continue with the command you had already used.
--
Glen Barber
___
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Not according to my understanding of portupgrade.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST)
gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it
worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly
i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1
box.
On 08/02/09 Matthew Seaman said:
I'd wager that 'pkg_info -l p5-Module-Giving-You-Trouble' says everything
is installed under ${LOCALBASE}/lib/perl5/site-perl/5.8.8 but that if you
run 'perl -v' the number 5.8.9 is prominently displayed.
Please read the UPDATING entry for 20090113, strike
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 16:43:37 +0100, Albert Shih said:
Hi all,
I've very strange thing with portupgrade. He failed on upgrade and tell me
=== Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
=== Registering installation for libxcb-1.1.93
=== Cleaning for libxcb-1.1.93
Le 11/02/2009 à 18:30:05+, Peter Harrison a écrit
Wednesday, 11 February 2009 at 16:43:37 +0100, Albert Shih said:
Hi all,
I've very strange thing with portupgrade. He failed on upgrade and tell me
=== Running ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
=== Registering
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
I'm having this with several perl modules while running a portupgrade -a.
=== p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
by ``make
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Here's an example.
msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall
Password:
=== Deinstalling for textproc/p5-XML-RSS
=== Deinstalling p5-XML-RSS-1.37
pkg_delete: unable to completely remove
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Here's an example.
msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall
Password:
=== Deinstalling for
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl modules that
resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled.
Following those dependencies resulted in the same, and so on...
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl modules that
resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled.
Following those dependencies
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl
modules that
resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled.
Following
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:37:24PM +0300, o...@adlogic.ru wrote:
Ewald, also look at /usr/ports/UPDATING , 20090123
Hi Oleg,
Thanks for the hint.
Do you mean portupgrade -rf libxcb? I did that before running
portupgrade -arR so I assume the problem I'm having is caused by
something
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:48:58AM +0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
During an upgrade of my ports involving x11 portupgrade dies (FreeBSD
7.1, AMD64)
Here's what I did: After cvsup, make fetchindex, I did a pkgdb -F and
then portupgrade -rf libxcb as per UPDATING of 20090123.
Next
Ajtim Civolvap wrote:
Hi!
My system 7.1.
I am (was) user of postmaster but the last update for Xorg it did mess. Than I
use portupgrade -arR and was okay, X works okay but when I run:
portupgrade -arR
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-vga:
is marked as broken: Needs to
[Josh Carroll]
For future runs, you might consider using something like screen
(/usr/ports/sysutils/screen) so you can resume the session later,
should you get disconnected.
I will, thanks for sharing.
Jos
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Jos Chrispijn j...@webrz.net wrote:
Can someone tell me what I should attend for when I am disconnected in the
middle of a portupgrade and the terminal session is aborted?
The portupgrade was halted by a [yes/no] prompt, on which I had to react.
Unfortunately
On 01/20/2009 09:10 AM Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Can someone tell me what I should attend for when I am disconnected in
the middle of a portupgrade and the terminal session is aborted?
The portupgrade was halted by a [yes/no] prompt, on which I had to
react. Unfortunately being not present and I
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
Having used portupgrade for several years I'm thinking to make the
switch to portmaster since both of them seem to be fully supported as
far as upgrading ports is concerned.
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Caveats/pitfalls?
Is there
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary packages to upgrade
your system. portmaster can create them (by adding the -g option) - but
not use them. This is the reason we use
On Thursday 15 January 2009 16:04:09 Christer Solskogen wrote:
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary packages to upgrade
your system. portmaster can create them (by adding
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Mitja lum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2009 16:04:09 Christer Solskogen wrote:
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Patrick Lamaizière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portupgrade is often confused with his database on upgrade.
Delete /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and retry.
May be you have to delete /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db too.
Hmm. This does not inspire confidence in the tool.
Mike
--
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:04:02PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Patrick Lamaizière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portupgrade is often confused with his database on upgrade.
Delete /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and retry.
May be you have to delete
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So don't use it? :-) There are alternatives like portmaster.
I suppose I prefer a single, reliable, supported tool for the system.
portupgrade seems to be pushed the most in all of the documentation
that I can find, so I
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:08:54PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So don't use it? :-) There are alternatives like portmaster.
I suppose I prefer a single, reliable, supported tool for the system.
portupgrade
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So don't use it? :-) There are alternatives like portmaster.
I suppose I prefer a single, reliable, supported tool for the system.
portupgrade seems to be pushed the most
Le Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:26:33 -0400,
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
So, I recently upgraded from 5.5 to 6.3, and as such, ran a
portupgrade -fa to rebuild my ports against 6.3.
I just noticed this.
=== Cleaning for ruby-1.8.6.287,1
--- Cleaning out obsolete shared
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Apitz wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I was updating all packages which have been installed by the FreeBSD
| 7.0R base installation and X11 with portupgrade like this:
|
| # portupgrade -f '2008-08-13 12:55'
|
| i.e. update all packages/ports which have
Same problem here, policykit-gnome also.
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hi,
Hope I didn't do something stupid here
Tried to 'portupgrade -R policykit' but it came back with an error. So I
deinstalled it and now I'm trying to reinstall it, but it fails with the
following error.
Works like a charm, many thanks.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:12:12PM -0300, Bruno Schmitt wrote:
div dir=ltrUpdate your ports. There is a new patched version 0.9_1 that
will
solve the problem. brbrbrdiv class=gmail_quoteOn Thu, Jul 24, 2008
at
2:07 AM, Alain G. Fabry lt;a
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 02:07:45PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran the command 'portupgrade -all' yesterday and now I have some
questions about the way the command works.
Building of numerous packages was preceeded by a graphical menu of
build options for the package to be built. In
DA Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do I fix this?
=== Registering installation for horde-base-3.2_3
pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package pear-Auth-1.6.1
pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package pear-Auth_SASL-1.0.2
pkg_create: dependency loop detected for package
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
From: Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If
* AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-13-2008]:
How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for quick response, I really forget to see this useful file...
Best wishes,
Kemian
On 25/03/2008, Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Robert Huff
___
At 11:59 AM 3/14/2008, bsd wrote:
Hello,
I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to
make a :
# potupgrade -fa
Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated
ports.
Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed
ports
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100
bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my
installed ports since I have updated my system?
In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry
unless you see a specific library problem. You could
bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to
make a :
# potupgrade -fa
Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated
ports.
Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed
ports since
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100
bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my
installed ports since I have updated my system?
In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry
unless you see a
On Monday 10 March 2008 15:38:17 Colin Brace wrote:
Hi all,
Earlier today I ran portupgrade -aP to update my system. Alas,
everytime it tried to download a package, it failed and resorted to
downloading and compiling the source. For example:
[...]
--- Checking for the latest package of
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:17:14 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just add BATCH=yes to your /etc/make.conf file
Caveat lector: this will effect every build you do. I prefer to set it
on a per-build instance.
Just my 2¢.
--
Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If pregnancy were a book they would
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:59:51 -0500
Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:17:14 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just add BATCH=yes to your /etc/make.conf file
Caveat lector: this will effect every build you do. I prefer to set it
on a per-build instance.
And
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get the portupgrade to just accept all of the defaults
for the configurations of the individual ports. I tried # env BATCH=yes,
but it still just goes on hanging on the port configuration menus. It
seems
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:55:32 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get the portupgrade to just accept all of the
defaults for the configurations of the individual ports. I tried #
env BATCH=yes, but it still just goes on hanging on the port
configuration menus. It seems as
You can try with
portupgrade -a --batch
Regards.
Vivian
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:55:32 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get the portupgrade to just accept all of the defaults
for the configurations of the individual ports. I tried # env BATCH=yes,
but it still just goes on
101 - 200 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
