Re: python27 update-py-psyco

2011-03-08 Thread b. f.
On 3/8/11, ajtiM wrote: > On Monday March 7 2011 08:37:46 b. f. wrote: >> On 3/7/11, ajtiM wrote: >> > On Sunday March 6 2011 12:01:47 b. f. wrote: >> > >> > Thank you. I am reading /usr/ports/UPDATING special like now but there >> > are problems. And I have a problem again with /usr/ports/devel/

Re: python27 update-py-psyco

2011-03-07 Thread ajtiM
On Monday March 7 2011 08:37:46 b. f. wrote: > On 3/7/11, ajtiM wrote: > > On Sunday March 6 2011 12:01:47 b. f. wrote: > > > > Thank you. I am reading /usr/ports/UPDATING special like now but there > > are problems. And I have a problem again with /usr/ports/devel/py-psyco > > I get: > > c/merge

Re: python27 update-py-psyco

2011-03-07 Thread b. f.
On 3/7/11, ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday March 6 2011 12:01:47 b. f. wrote: > Thank you. I am reading /usr/ports/UPDATING special like now but there are > problems. And I have a problem again with /usr/ports/devel/py-psyco > I get: > c/mergepoints.c:242: error 'JUMP_IF_FALSE' undeclared here > *** Err

Re: python27 update-py-psyco

2011-03-07 Thread ajtiM
On Sunday March 6 2011 12:01:47 b. f. wrote: > >I am using portmaster all the time more or less without problems. > >I like to switch to portupgrade but I don't know if is good to mix them. I > >think I will wait to FreeBSD 9 and than install evrything from scratch. > > You would have encountered

Re: python27 update

2011-03-06 Thread b. f.
>I am using portmaster all the time more or less without problems. >I like to switch to portupgrade but I don't know if is good to mix them. I >think I will wait to FreeBSD 9 and than install evrything from scratch. You would have encountered the problem that you mentioned regardless of whether yo

Re: python27 update

2011-03-06 Thread ajtiM
On Sunday March 6 2011 08:09:01 Robert Huff wrote: > Jerry writes: > > > > Sadly, this is one of those times when portupgrade seems > > > > to handle things better, but you'll probably have to wait another > > > > day to see if things worked out better this time. > > > > > > For me, using por

Re: python27 update

2011-03-06 Thread Robert Huff
Jerry writes: > > > Sadly, this is one of those times when portupgrade seems > > > to handle things better, but you'll probably have to wait another > > > day to see if things worked out better this time. > > > > For me, using portupgrade on 3 different systems (7.4 and 8.1) to > > upgrade

Re: python27 update

2011-03-06 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 19:53:22 -0800 Nerius Landys articulated: > > Sadly, this is one of those times when portupgrade seems > > to handle things better, but you'll probably have to wait another > > day to see if things worked out better this time. > > For me, using portupgrade on 3 different syste

Re: python27 update

2011-03-05 Thread b. f.
... > I tried to update python26 to python27. I did as I red in /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > portmaster -o lang/python27 lang/python26 and than > > cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER > > and after one day and a half of pressing yes for deleting old files I got: H

Re: python27 update

2011-03-05 Thread Nerius Landys
> Sadly, this is one of those times when portupgrade seems > to handle things better, but you'll probably have to wait another > day to see if things worked out better this time. For me, using portupgrade on 3 different systems (7.4 and 8.1) to upgrade Python 2.6 to 2.7 worked like a charm. Just

Re: python27 update

2011-03-05 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 5 March 2011 21:52, ajtiM wrote: > My system: 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0 > > I tried to update python26 to python27. I did as I red in /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > portmaster -o lang/python27 lang/python26 and than > >  cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTE