Re: zfs raid and/or hardware raid..

2009-02-11 Thread Matias Surdi
If your are just going to play with it, the play as much as you want with ZFS. But, if you are going to setup something that will have to go on production some day, at least at this moment i wouldn't recommend you ZFS. I've used it for a backup server, and due to power failures in the

Re: zfs raid and/or hardware raid..

2009-02-11 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:58:04PM -0500, B. Cook wrote: I have a dimension 9150 that I am going to put amd64 freebsd on to play with. It has Intel ICH7 SATA300 on it, in the bios it says it can do raid. I'm assuming that would be a hardware raid.. You are assuming wrong. It is software

Re: zfs raid and/or hardware raid..

2009-02-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
RAID implementations (and most of the cheaper add-on RAID cards.) RAID that is supported in the BIOS have one advantage over other software implementations, and that is that you can boot from all supported RAID configurations, which is not always the case otherwise. always - if you use

Re: zfs raid and/or hardware raid..

2009-02-11 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:18:42PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: RAID implementations (and most of the cheaper add-on RAID cards.) RAID that is supported in the BIOS have one advantage over other software implementations, and that is that you can boot from all supported RAID