On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:50 pm, Michael Madden > wrote:
> Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
> I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
> my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
> FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
> go ahead a learn/setu
> > * Are you concerned about security?
> > sendmail is a big monolithic SUID-root programs,
> > while postfix is a set of isolated processes/programs,
> > so postfix _may_ be a better alternative.
>
> please don't post false/outdated information.
>
> Sendmail 8.12.* is SGID to a non-privil
Postfix is just as good, faster and free... without the quotes.
search daemonnews for some good postfix articles.
David Benfell wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:13:31 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote:
Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not only is
it everything Po
I am surprised that no one has mentioned "exim". Been using it since
97 and wouldn't use anything else. Very straight forward to configure,
very powerful, and very well supported by its author and the
community...
I believe it is in the ports system, but I build my own so I don't know
for su
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:13:31 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote:
>
> Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not only is
> it everything Postfix aspires to be, it has a zillion hours of runtime
> under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever because there hasn't
> been any
Hi Chuck,
--On Sunday, March 07, 2004 04:13:31 PM -0800 Chuck McManis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not
only is it everything Postfix aspires to be, it has a zillion hours
of runtime under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever
But it does say:
If sendmail works for you, use it. If you have difficulties, use
postfix instead.
> Should I go ahead a learn/setup sendmail?
I don't recommend it.
Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not only is
it everything Postfix aspires to be, it has a zill
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:23:18 +1030
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 March 2004 at 20:50:11 -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> > Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
> > I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
> > my book I've been learning FreeB
On Saturday, 6 March 2004 at 20:50:11 -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
> I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
> my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
> FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix.
But it does say:
If s
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 08:50:11PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
> I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
> my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
> FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
> go ahead a learn/
> Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
> I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
> my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
> FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
> go ahead a learn/setup sendmail? If so, where's
> a good place to find a tutoria
Which MTA is the recommended one to use on FreeBSD?
I've noticed sendmail is installed by default, but
my book I've been learning FreeBSD from (The Complete
FreeBSD) only covers setting up postfix. Should I
go ahead a learn/setup sendmail? If so, where's
a good place to find a tutorial on setting
12 matches
Mail list logo
