Modulok wrote:
00xc0a80132 link#1 UCS 00 bge0
snip
1. The first entry, it's not IPv4, IPv6 or a MAC address that I've
ever seen, what format is it?
Hi Modulok,
It's possible to represent IPv4 addresses as a single number. I don't
recall the algorithm
(aaa), BB = hex(bbb), etc.
In particular, 0xc0a80132 is the hex equivalent of 192.168.1.50.
An IP address + netmask can normally be represented in the routing
table via the slash notation-- say 192.168.1.50/24 meaning a
255.255.255.0 (or 0xff00) netmask. Non-contiguous netmasks
Hi all,
I have a firewall/router with FreeBSD 6.2 installed on it. 2 ISP connection
and 2 LAN connections. I need to do a policy-based routing. All I need that
packets coming from one ISP interface return to that interface (incoming
connections' source based routing) and the other hand do a IP
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:26:17AM +0500, Narek Gharibyan wrote:
I have a firewall/router with FreeBSD 6.2 installed on it. 2 ISP connection
and 2 LAN connections. I need to do a policy-based routing. All I need that
packets coming from one ISP interface return to that interface (incoming
Hello All,
Here I am trying to do NAT , I made everything like configureing the
NAT and compiling kernel. I could access the gateway as well from the
client computer but could not access the Internet from the client
computer. When I triend to access the interent from client computer
such error
Neo, good day.
Fri, May 04, 2007 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Neo [GC] wrote:
Config at home (deleted all unnessesary):
Output of ifconfig:
fxp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
Hi,
i try to use a FreeBSD 6-STABLE machine as VPN-gateway for my home
network. For VPN I use OpenVPN, wich connects to an outside
OpenVPN-server. The connection itself works, but i need to get routing
working for my LAN.
I have searched in Google and group archives, but i can't find an easy
(100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500
pflog0: flags=0 mtu 33208
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ netstat -rn
Routing tables
Ineternet
10.10.10.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
It appears the server is not routing it between the interfaces.
I have net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 with sysctl.
Can anyone shed some light on what I am missing here to have packets from
10.10.10.1 hit 10.10.8.1 directly?
Both IPs
it, and there shouldn't
be.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
If you're having problems with routing performance, please post some
details relevant to the problem. You should start with such basics as
the version of FreeBSD that you're using, and move into cut/pasting
I have FreeBSD 6.2 box with 1 NIC and 2 IPs.
The first IP is to access internet, the second
is for the ISP's LAN.
Unfortunately I have internet, but no access to
the other network.
I made a test. I assigned to the NIC only the local
IP and removed the defaultrouter. Then, of course,
I have no
Hi,
I am having some problems with source routing using PF, I tried the PF
mailing list but got no responses.
The network layout is available at: http://www.tomjudge.com/tmp/tunnels.png
From the diagram Host A and B both have there default gateway set as
ISP A's router, and have a PF rule
and removed the defaultrouter. Then, of course,
I have no internet but was able to access the ISP's
network.
I've tried everything I know, but still nothing
Consider providing more details, such as the output of ifconfig and
netstat -rn.
Sure sounds like a routing issue, but I doubt anyone can say
like a routing issue, but I doubt anyone can say anything
more without details.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
You are right.
ifconfig
--
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet 212.25.37.96 netmask 0xff00
providing more details, such as the output of ifconfig and
netstat -rn.
Sure sounds like a routing issue, but I doubt anyone can say anything
more without details.
You are right.
ifconfig
--
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
Nothing? You're able to arp 192.168.64.1 and 192.168.64.3, can you ping
them?
Since you have an RFC-1918 address on both the inside and the outside, I
assume you're running nat on this machine to translate internal machine
traffic. It looks like you have all the routes you need, so my
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:10:07PM +0200, George Vanev wrote:
I have FreeBSD 6.2 box with 1 NIC and 2 IPs.
The first IP is to access internet, the second
is for the ISP's LAN.
Unfortunately I have internet, but no access to
the other network.
We need network IP configuration details; ie
OK, but my switch doesn't support 802.1Q.
I must change my switch if i want to make a intervlan routing ???
Patch kernel for ISL support doesn't exist???
-
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions
a intervlan routing ???
Patch kernel for ISL support doesn't exist???
-
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions !
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes
sur Yahoo! Questions
Hello all,
For information, i'm french and my english is very bad.
ISL encapsulation is it compatible with FreeBSD for intervlan routing???
Thanks
-
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:58:54 +0100 (CET), in
sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote:
Hello all,
For information, i'm french and my english is very bad.
ISL encapsulation is it compatible with FreeBSD for intervlan routing???
Hi.
It is not, but 802.1q vlan trunking
127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.21.1
add net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif
Expire
default
On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:01, Patrick Dung wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86
to routing socket: No such process
delete net 192.168.3.0: not in table
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# route delete -host 192.168.3.0
delete host 192.168.3.0
--- Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:01, Patrick Dung wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command
i did this once too! the quickest way to fix the problem is:
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
-g
On 11/01/07, Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0
Any ideas
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0
Any ideas
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
What is the output of netstat -nrf inet ?
Does route delete 192.168.3.0 help?
Armin
--
PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer,
less typing.
# route add 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0
How did you try to remove it (exact comand line, please),
and what was the error message
FIXED, ignore this email..
However no one has answered.
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers
Hello Gurus,
This is an Urgent help, as everything pending, waiting.. a FreeBSD
Solution.
and I appologize if I will explain in details, please be patient with
me.
Just yesterday, our ISP installed 2 routers (both 3com) at our main
office.
One router acting for Datalink between
I try to do dual routing on my freebsd box but its was not
sucecssfull. any one can help?
rithy4uSpamAppliance delivered the standard messaging system
http://www.rithy4u.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
* On 01/01/07 17:17 +0700, Office of the CIO-rithy4u.NET wrote:
| I try to do dual routing on my freebsd box but its was not
| sucecssfull. any one can help?
Explain what is dual routing. What exactly are you trying to achieve?
-Wash
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
On 1/1/07, Office of the CIO-rithy4u.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to do dual routing on my freebsd box but its was not
sucecssfull. any one can help?
Not with the information that you've provided. Perhaps you could
explain what you tried, and what you mean by not successful? Details
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Office of the CIO-rithy4u.NET
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 2:17 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Routing
I try to do dual routing on my freebsd box but its
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 09:49, Bret J. Esquivel wrote:
Hi,
I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1
firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My
question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having
Hi,
I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1
firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My
question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an
external IP address but still going through the firewall box?
were you)
Routing wouldn't work in this scenario as you dont have enough control,
you would have to bridge the interfaces on your firewall. man if_bridge.
Bridging xl0 and xl1 on your firewall will make it act like a 2 port
hub, but pf ,ipfw and ipf can still filter packets going across
that system up as a router, and build a proper
routing table. Your ISP will need to be involved so they know to route
traffic to your subnet through your gateway system.
You need to enable forwarding in /etc/rc.conf. Then you'll need to
subnet your range properly. Something like:
70.164.48.225/29
Hi,
I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1
firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My
question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an
external IP address but still going through the firewall box?
Hello Everyone,
I have a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE box that has two network cards (Dual
Homed?). Each card is on a different network, as following
(from /etc/rc.conf):
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 192.168.20.36 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_rl0=inet 192.168.210.6 netmask 255.255.255.0
.
I suggest that you pick up Computer Networks: A System Approach by
Peterson and Davie to pick up a basic idea of how networking and routing
works, and maybe consult http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network
as a basis for planning out how things will be done, in particular with
network
Hey all,
Are there any supported methods for enabling multipath routing under
FreeBSD. I currently have a couple BSD boxes which potentially have two
default gateways to our two core routers, and I'd like to be able to
load-balance. Doing it in IPFW or DUMMYNET would seem to break OSPF
Hi everyone,
I've been reading the mailing list for a while, but it's my first post. I'm
not sure what is causing the problem so I'm posting to multiple lists. I'm
running FreeBSD 6.1 on a Celeron 2.8GHz with 512Mo of RAM. It looks likes
after a while (a couple of weeks) the routing isn't
Martin Turgeon wrote:
I've been reading the mailing list for a while, but it's my first post. I'm
not sure what is causing the problem so I'm posting to multiple lists. I'm
running FreeBSD 6.1 on a Celeron 2.8GHz with 512Mo of RAM. It looks likes
after a while (a couple of weeks) the routing
Erik Norgaard wrote:
There is some trick to handle that, IIRC something like this would do:
ext_if=fxp0 # external interface
nat on $ext_if from lan to !lan - ($ext_if)
The () means that pf will lookup the ip on that interface, and update
dynamically when the ip changes.
That is correct.
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik Norgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 18 octobre 2006 10:30
À : Martin Turgeon
Cc : freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: Routing with external interface doesn't work after a while
Martin Turgeon wrote
Martin Turgeon wrote:
I've been reading the mailing list for a while, but it's my first post. I'm
not sure what is causing the problem so I'm posting to multiple lists. I'm
running FreeBSD 6.1 on a Celeron 2.8GHz with 512Mo of RAM. It looks likes
after a while (a couple of weeks) the routing
Martin Turgeon wrote:
The NAT rules are already written that way:
nat on $wan_if tag LAN_WAN_NAT tagged LAN_WAN - ($wan_if)
nat on $wan_if tag WLS_WAN_NAT tagged WLS_WAN - ($wan_if)
nat on $wan_if tag AP_WAN_NAT tagged AP_WAN - ($wan_if)
nat on $wan_if tag VPN_WAN_NAT tagged VPN_WAN - ($wan_if)
You're right on this, the filtering rules aren't written with the brackets.
But isn't pf routing the packets to an interface instead of an IP address.
Thanks a lot
Martin
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik Norgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 18 octobre 2006 12:41
À : Martin Turgeon
Martin Turgeon wrote:
You're right on this, the filtering rules aren't written with the brackets.
But isn't pf routing the packets to an interface instead of an IP address.
I can't tell you if this affects your setup since I have't seen the
ruleset.
You're going to tag then nat
Hi there,
I want to setup a gateway / firewall solution with current FreeBSD. The
network has following structure:
Several host (host[1,...,x].domain.net) are defined within the DNS and
all of them have the same A-Record with the IP 1.2.3.4
The gateway is listening on its external network
Hi;
I'm updating my firewall and I've found a nifty how-to that recommends
using a BSD box in front of another box as your firewall, using the
first as a router and passing one NIC to the other box. Can't all that
be done from the same box?
TIA,
beno
* On 09/08/06 14:01 -0400, beno wrote:
| Hi;
| I'm updating my firewall and I've found a nifty how-to that recommends
| using a BSD box in front of another box as your firewall, using the
| first as a router and passing one NIC to the other box. Can't all that
| be done from the same box?
Hi
I'm updating my firewall and I've found a nifty how-to that recommends
using a BSD box in front of another box as your firewall, using the
first as a router and passing one NIC to the other box. Can't all that
be done from the same box?
I am not sure I know what you are doing. What do you
a Speedtouch 715v5 using FreeBSD 6.1. I've set up the
modem
using a beta-sip_spoof, however, it seems that this routing is not working.
Would
FreeBSD 6.1 do this differently from FreeBSD 4.10?
ta,
t.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
I am running a 5.4 box as a gateway server / firewall / mail relay at
our company. Previously we had a 4.3-beta server which although
horribly outdated hardly ever gave us any problems. Since replacing it
with a Dell 850 and installing 5.4 I have experienced intermittent
routing issues
In answer to my own question. When I disable the firewall on the server
the routing issue is instantly resolved. However for 90% of the time
the firewall runs without any apparent problems... I will start a new
thread of conversation and ask my now firewall related problem. Sorry
for my
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have caused
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have caused
routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have caused this, is that I
ran ettercap on the server to diagnose why our servers wouldnt link. I did
NOT
run any ARP poisoning or DNS spoofing attacks
(My apologies if you're recieving this email for the third time. It
doesnt seem as the previous ones reached the list)
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have caused
Daniel A. wrote:
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have
Valerio daelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello
I would like to know if exists a sysctl to get the number of
routing tables in the kernel.
I don't want the list of the routing tables, I just want the number.
The command 'netstat -rn|wc -l' could be a good candidate,
but since I want
Hello
I would like to know if exists a sysctl to get the number of
routing tables in the kernel.
I don't want the list of the routing tables, I just want the number.
The command 'netstat -rn|wc -l' could be a good candidate,
but since I want to implement this command on a very busy router,
I don't
Hello,
I'm trying to set up an additional routing for a host via a VPN tunnel
with IPsec. The tunnel is working now, I see tcp packages going out with
tcpdump, but IMCP host unreachable packages coming in from the VPN peer.
What I did:
route add A.B.C.D W.X.Y.Z
Where A.B.C.D is the target
-
From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote:
By default, it sets the netif to em0
OK
I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP
addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command in a
number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of
em0, with the right gateway.
em0 is aaa.bbb.ccc.207
em1
Hi,
You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing:
cat ipf.example
pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from 10.1.0.0/16 to a.b.c.d/32
^d
ipf -f ipf.example
This way you will re-route all packets coming from source 10.1/16 to
destination a.b.c.d to go to address
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Goran Gajic
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
Hi,
You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing:
cat ipf.example
pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from
On 2/14/2006 5:44 AM Steve Douville wrote:
I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP
addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command in a
number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of
em0, with the right
-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
What happens with a simple 'route add certain ip address
aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve?
HTH,
Drew
___
freebsd-questions
By default, it sets the netif to em0
- Original Message -
From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve
Message -
From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: IP Routing Question
On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote:
Weird stuff...
route add -host
--On Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:40:45 -0800 Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote:
Weird stuff...
route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1
Shouldn't this be:
route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd aaa.bbb.ccc.209
Where
Routing Question
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Hartzell writes:
quick summary
I have set up an ssh based vpn between a -STABLE laptop and a 5.3
server. I can ping either end from the other. I'd like to route
traffic from the laptop to the public IP address of the server but it
doesn't seem to work. I can, as a
quick summary
I have set up an ssh based vpn between a -STABLE laptop and a 5.3
server. I can ping either end from the other. I'd like to route
traffic from the laptop to the public IP address of the server but it
doesn't seem to work. I can, as a sanity test, route packets from
the
Hi:
I got mpd working and logined into pptp server through
internet. From my pc, I can ping internal interface of
the pptp server, 192.168.128.1 (my pc address is
192.168.128.10). the problem is that I can't ping
anything beyond that, such as 192.168.128.2 (it
actually is an interface of a
On 1/31/06, gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I got mpd working and logined into pptp server through
internet. From my pc, I can ping internal interface of
the pptp server, 192.168.128.1 (my pc address is
192.168.128.10). the problem is that I can't ping
anything beyond that, such as
On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gidday folks,
I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
setup
routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The
tunnel is
setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6
websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on
my gateway
Gidday folks,
I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6
websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on my
gateway
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gidday folks,
I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6
On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gidday folks,
I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
setup
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gidday folks,
I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
I
Hi ,
I have a similar situation,
My provider has blocked all incoming ports so I can't access my PC from the
internet side.
Did you find any solution?
Thank You
Szabi
Hi all!
I have the following problem:
I'm running a FreeBSD SSH server.
Some clients can't connect to it. They are on a
Molnár szabolcs wrote:
Hi ,
I have a similar situation,
My provider has blocked all incoming ports so I
can't access my
PC from the internet side. Did you find any
solution?
Maybe following scheme can help you understand how to
apply
ssh-tunnel:
# Local ssh-tunnel:
#client$ ssh -L
I'm trying to set up an OpenVPN tunnel, from a remote (Win XP)
machine to my local network. I've got that working, except for one
problem. When I start the OpenVPN server, my FreeBSD
router/firewall/ipnat/OpenVPN machine stops routing packets to the
outside world. The machine is running 6.0
Hi,
I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD, but the most difficult part in
this change it seems to be the transition from iproute2 to ipfw to make
policy routing, this case works on Linux but I'm still not able to get it
works on FreeBSD.
Net1: 192.168.0.0/25
Net2: 192.168.0.128/25
On 24 Oct 2005 09:22:34 -0400, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahnjoan Amous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP
server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient
isn't
handling this well and I
, it
seems that the FreeBSD machine is simply not routing the data from
one subnet to the other. I've verified that it's not the firewall
blocking packets. How do I get these subnets to communicate?
Did you put gateway_enable=YES in rc.conf?
Did you read
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Jason Morgan
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:03:11AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Jason Morgan
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing
Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD
system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other
subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here
9:42 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Quick Routing Question
I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD
system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet
is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a diagram of my
network, I think it's
on the LAN side of the AP is irrelevant, so long as you
don't conflict with another IP.
- Give the wireless laptop a static IP inside the wireless IP subnet
- Have nothing plugged into the WAN side of the wireless AP, as you
don't want routing with that unit, you just want a layer-2
(bridged/switched
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:03:26AM -0800, Brian E. Conklin wrote:
Do you have gateway_enable=YES in your rc.conf?
Yes, I do. The FreeBSD works fine for routing to the outside, it's
between the subnets where I run into issues.
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
the Linksys set up, I will.
- Have nothing plugged into the WAN side of the wireless AP, as you
don't want routing with that unit, you just want a layer-2
(bridged/switched) AP.
Correct.
- effectively, if you have wireless connectivity from the laptop to the
AP, you should be able to ping
201 - 300 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
