As mentioned before, this is already solved.
On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U
>> lo0
>>
>> ifconfig_em0="inet 70.89.123.5 netmask 255.255.255.248"
>> ifconfig_em1="inet 70.89.123.4 netmask 255.25
ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0
ifconfig_em0="inet 70.89.123.5 netmask 255.255.255.248"
ifconfig_em1="inet 70.89.123.4 netmask 255.255.255.248"
defaultrouter="70.89.123.6"
hostname="se**.somehtingelse.biz"
I tried to add the gateway for link2
t have two L3 nets, but two ips on the
> same net - nothing to route, except the default.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
>
> To: Free BSD Questions list
> Sent: Thu Nov 11 21:41:40 2010
> Subject: Routing issue?
>
> I&
What exactly isn't working? You don't have two L3 nets, but two ips on the same
net - nothing to route, except the default.
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: Free BSD Questions list
Sent: Thu Nov 11 21:41:40 2010
Subject: Routing issue?
I&#
I'm trying to get the other half of my business up on my second IP.
It's not routing. This is not a multi-homed system, but two IPs in the same
subnet.
[r...@server /usr/home/ryan]# netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
On Wednesday 12 of May 2010 06:07, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> I'm getting a route added upon reboot with the hostname of the box,
> going to lo0.
> It's preventing things like, pinging itself. I can manually delete the
> route, but.. where is it being set to begin with?!
well, that behaviour is what i wo
Running: FreeBSD caduceus.wingfoot.org 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD
8.0-RELEASE-p2 #42: Fri May 7 19:22:48 EDT 2010
r...@caduceus.wingfoot.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDALS amd64
I'm getting a route added upon reboot with the hostname of the box,
going to lo0.
It's preventing things like, pinging itse
Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE box that has two network cards (Dual
Homed?). Each card is on a different network, as following
(from /etc/rc.conf):
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.20.36 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.210.6 netmask 255.255.
Hello Everyone,
I have a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE box that has two network cards (Dual
Homed?). Each card is on a different network, as following
(from /etc/rc.conf):
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.20.36 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.210.6 netmask 255.255.255.0"
defaultrouter="192.168
On 1/31/06, gahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I got mpd working and logined into pptp server through
> internet. From my pc, I can ping internal interface of
> the pptp server, 192.168.128.1 (my pc address is
> 192.168.128.10). the problem is that I can't ping
> anything beyond that, such a
Hi:
I got mpd working and logined into pptp server through
internet. From my pc, I can ping internal interface of
the pptp server, 192.168.128.1 (my pc address is
192.168.128.10). the problem is that I can't ping
anything beyond that, such as 192.168.128.2 (it
actually is an interface of a router,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:55:45PM -0500, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote:
> > > > > ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > > > ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > > > defaultrouter="1.2.3.1"
> > >
> > > It's not on the same network; that's the problem. T
> > > > ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > > ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > > defaultrouter="1.2.3.1"
> >
> > It's not on the same network; that's the problem. Two complete separate
> > networks, same interface card. The issue is that one of th
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:31:36AM -0500, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote:
> > > ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > > defaultrouter="1.2.3.1"
> >
> > You need to change your netmask for the alias to 255.255.255.255 if
On Jul 19, 2004, at 02:12, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote:
That network card has a config roughly like
ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
defaultrouter="1.2.3.1"
Excuse me why I interject that it's a royal PITA when people post
> > ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
> > defaultrouter="1.2.3.1"
>
> You need to change your netmask for the alias to 255.255.255.255 if it's
> on the same network.
It's not on the same network; that's the problem. Two
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 11:12, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote:
> I just installed a secondary internet connection at my office, and I'm
> having a bizarre issue...
>
> I have a network card - dc0
>
> That network card has a config roughly like
>
> ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
I just installed a secondary internet connection at my office, and I'm
having a bizarre issue...
I have a network card - dc0
That network card has a config roughly like
ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
defaultrouter="1.2.3
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 18:25, Leon Botes wrote:
> I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client.
> The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22
> The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the
> gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also
> has an alias of 1
Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2004 13:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue
One other thing you can try. There is a sysctl variable
net.inet.ip.redirect: 1
Try turning that off by setting it to 0 on the client machine.
What happens ?
Nelis
On Wed
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:28, Leon Botes wrote:
> The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual hosts have
> been removed. Just a few examples left.
> 10.5/16192.168.254.29 UGSc0 11 fxp1
> 10.6/16192.168.254.12 UGSc0
Can you show us the routing on the server please rather than the client ?
What is the subnet mask of the alias 196.25.37.19 ? It should have a subnet
of 255.255.255.255 as it's on the same network as 196.25.37.18.
Cheers,
--
Nelis Lamprecht
PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc
"Unix IS use
Could you provide the output of ifconfig -a of the gateway box?
Should shed some more light about the issues, also the parts of
/etc/rc.conf, where the cards are configured, could be interesting.
Olaf
--
Olaf Hoyer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welche
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:55, Leon Botes wrote:
> I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client.
> The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22
> The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the
> gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also
> has an alias of 196.
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Leon Botes wrote:
> I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client.
> The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22
> The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the
> gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also
> has an alias of 196.25.37.1
I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client.
The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22
The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the
gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also
has an alias of 196.25.37.19.
When i ping 196.25.37.18 from the clients box
Hello,
I have few questions regarding the Dynamic Rouitng (i.e. routed) and gif0
interface.
Questions:
1. There is any in-compatibility or known bug, if we use routed and gif0
interface together (I am using freeBSD 4.8 Release).
2. If there is no known bug then any one tested the above men
Hello,
I have few questions regarding the Dynamic Rouitng (i.e. routed) and gif0
interface.
I go through the following documents:
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/ipsec.html
http://asherah.dyndns.org/~josh/ipsec-howto.txt
and follow the following steps:
1. Configure the gif0 interface usin
yes, it is cable/dsl. that would explain the lack of connectivity under
the linksys scenario.
i will try this again and report back. thank you for the clue
stephen d. kingrea
On 10 Jan 2003, Matt Smith wrote:
>Regarding your ISP -- is this a DSL connection? If so, your DMZ server
>(connect
Regarding your ISP -- is this a DSL connection? If so, your DMZ server
(connected to the Hub) probably needs to run PPPoE. Is it? Anything
behind the linksys device does not, because the linksys device takes
care of PPPoE for everything behind it.
-Matt
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 14:20, Stephen D. K
ok, i know that i am a newbie, but perhaps what i am trying to do is
impossible.
goal: host 2 domains locally
equipment: linksys wireless router (4 ethernet connections--wireless not
running yet), freebsd 4.7 on dedicated p166, and several boxes/os's
connected dhcp.
i assigned router 1 static add
31 matches
Mail list logo
