Laurence Sanford said the following, On 2007-05-15 00:41:
I see where this is going. Actually, in the original db that I created,
there is no conflict with "key" rather it appears to be start. However,
I can specify that and get (correct) output from the queries. It looks
like the problem is r
Laurence Sanford said the following, On 2007-05-15 00:41:
I see where this is going. Actually, in the original db that I created,
there is no conflict with "key" rather it appears to be start. However,
I can specify that and get (correct) output from the queries. It looks
like the problem is r
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
Drew Sanford said the following, On 2007-05-14 20:42:
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
Drew said the following, On 2007-05-14 14:52:
As promised, I'm attaching a database I just threw together. It
only has
four entries, and one query, but clearly the query should list
everythin
Drew Sanford said the following, On 2007-05-14 20:42:
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
Drew said the following, On 2007-05-14 14:52:
As promised, I'm attaching a database I just threw together. It only has
four entries, and one query, but clearly the query should list
everything in
table1.
SELECT *
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
Drew said the following, On 2007-05-14 14:52:
As promised, I'm attaching a database I just threw together. It only has
four entries, and one query, but clearly the query should list
everything in
table1.
SELECT * FROM table1 ORDER BY "key"
Drew said the following, On 2007-05-14 14:52:
As promised, I'm attaching a database I just threw together. It only has
four entries, and one query, but clearly the query should list
everything in
table1.
SELECT * FROM table1 ORDER BY "key"
A quick note: "k
As promised, I'm attaching a database I just threw together. It only has
four entries, and one query, but clearly the query should list everything in
table1.
On 5/13/07, Laurence Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> On 12 Maj, 02:41, Danny Pansters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Jarosław Staniek wrote:
On 12 Maj, 02:41, Danny Pansters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > yields an empty result. Does anyone have any pointers on what it
might
> > > take to get this working again? I have about 30 saved queries,
none of
> > > them work any more.
>
> > What kind of database?
On 12 Maj, 02:41, Danny Pansters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > yields an empty result. Does anyone have any pointers on what it might
> > > take to get this working again? I have about 30 saved queries, none of
> > > them work any more.
>
> > What kind of database? Native (SQLite), MySQL, Post
On Friday 11 May 2007 22:44:39 Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
> Op vrijdag 11 mei 2007, schreef Drew Sanford:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am using Kexi to track various things in my office, including time
> > off. This works well because I can write queries for each employee
> > showing me how much time they hav
Op vrijdag 11 mei 2007, schreef Drew Sanford:
Hi,
> I am using Kexi to track various things in my office, including time
> off. This works well because I can write queries for each employee
> showing me how much time they have requested off, etc. - however it
> appears that after a recent u
Hello,
I am using Kexi to track various things in my office, including time
off. This works well because I can write queries for each employee
showing me how much time they have requested off, etc. - however it
appears that after a recent upgrade of all ports, which included a KDE
update, SQL
12 matches
Mail list logo