On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:55, Giorgos Keramidas
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
>> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
>> invokes installation of FF 2.x.
>>
>> Thi
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
> invokes installation of FF 2.x.
>
> This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
> inst
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 15:15, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
>> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
>> invokes installation of FF 2.x.
>>
>> This fails
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:59:51 -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
> I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
> as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
> invokes installation of FF 2.x.
>
> This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
> ins
I notice that for both The Gimp and graphviz, and probably for others
as well, marking them or their dependencies as able to render SVG
invokes installation of FF 2.x.
This fails, as the port is marked as forbidden, and then the
installation of these graphics programs fails.
Not a huge deal, but