RE: Samba/two Win2K machines

2004-12-09 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Hepworth > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:03 AM > To: Patrick Lindholm > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Samba/two Win2K machines > > > Patrick > >

Re: Samba/two Win2K machines

2004-12-09 Thread Martin Hepworth
Patrick doing this over a 10mbs half duplex network will give lots of collisions (a half duplex network uses one set of wires to communicate both ways - hence you get collisions as both machines try to talk at the same time. Also the smb protocal isn't very efficient so a long time like this is

RE: Samba/two Win2K machines

2004-12-08 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
d you shouldn't be asking about it here. There are many Windows forums. Ted > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick > Lindholm > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Samba/two W

Samba/two Win2K machines

2004-12-08 Thread Patrick Lindholm
Hello I have tried to find solution to my problem for a while but have only found solutions to why is Samba on Freebsd between Win2k too slow. Mine wokrs fine between win2k and BSD box. I have freebsd 4.10 and 10MB network. With pentium 300mhz and 128MB memory running samba-3.0.5 i´m not very