Samba 3.2 FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Hello all. Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Samba 3.2 FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.orgwrote: Hello all. Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Re: Samba 3.2 FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? Oh. But why it is devel? Samba 3.3 is officially stable. -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___

Re: Samba 3.2 FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Michael Powell
Proskurin Kirill wrote: Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? Oh. But why it is devel? Samba 3.3 is officially stable. Look in the subdirectory called files for the port. You

Re: Samba 3.2 FreeBSD

2009-02-10 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:04:52 +0300 Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org wrote: Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? net/samba3-devel ?? Oh. But why it is devel? Samba 3.3 is officially stable.