Hello all.
Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports?
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill
proskurin...@fxclub.orgwrote:
Hello all.
Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports?
net/samba3-devel ??
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill
Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports?
net/samba3-devel ??
Oh. But why it is devel?
Samba 3.3 is officially stable.
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
___
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill
Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports?
net/samba3-devel ??
Oh. But why it is devel?
Samba 3.3 is officially stable.
Look in the subdirectory called files for the port. You
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:04:52 +0300
Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill
Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports?
net/samba3-devel ??
Oh. But why it is devel?
Samba 3.3 is officially stable.